R v Stephenson, 2019 ABCA 453
| Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Peter Martin; The Honourable Mr. Justice Frans Slatter; The Honourable Madam Justice Ritu Khullar |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Case Date | November 22, 2019 |
| Jurisdiction | Alberta |
| Citations | 2019 ABCA 453 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
R v Hills, 2020 ABCA 263
...is absent; and judicial economy dictates not squandering time and resources on matters that need not be decided: see also R v Stephenson, 2019 ABCA 453 at paras 18-19. For those reasons, I will deal with the hypothetical on the record rather than introducing one of my own making. As n......
-
R v Hilbach, 2020 ABCA 332
...If the answer to step 4 is no, the mandatory minimum sentence will withstand Charter scrutiny. [36] As this Court said in R v Stephenson, 2019 ABCA 453, paras 17-18, 382 CCC (3d) 285, if a court determines that a mandatory minimum is not grossly disproportionate to a fit and proper sentence......
-
R v Ndhlovu, 2020 ABCA 307
...Charter analysis. [144] As this Court has previously found, assessing hypotheticals afresh on appeal is not ideal: R v Stephenson, 2019 ABCA 453 at para 19; R v Newborn, 2020 ABCA 120 at para 5. More specifically, in this matter the issues raised by the Intervenors including inter alia, ass......
-
R v Melrose,
...2020 ABCA 332 at para 35; R v EJB, 2018 ABCA 239, leave app denied 2019 CanLII 45254, at paras 56-57; Ford at para 10; R v Stephenson, 2019 ABCA 453 at para [8] The Crown has not advanced a s. 1 argument, should I find that the mandatory minimum sentence limits s. 12: Crown Brief at para 48......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
R v Hills, 2020 ABCA 263
...is absent; and judicial economy dictates not squandering time and resources on matters that need not be decided: see also R v Stephenson, 2019 ABCA 453 at paras 18-19. For those reasons, I will deal with the hypothetical on the record rather than introducing one of my own making. As n......
-
R v Hilbach, 2020 ABCA 332
...If the answer to step 4 is no, the mandatory minimum sentence will withstand Charter scrutiny. [36] As this Court said in R v Stephenson, 2019 ABCA 453, paras 17-18, 382 CCC (3d) 285, if a court determines that a mandatory minimum is not grossly disproportionate to a fit and proper sentence......
-
R v Ndhlovu, 2020 ABCA 307
...Charter analysis. [144] As this Court has previously found, assessing hypotheticals afresh on appeal is not ideal: R v Stephenson, 2019 ABCA 453 at para 19; R v Newborn, 2020 ABCA 120 at para 5. More specifically, in this matter the issues raised by the Intervenors including inter alia, ass......
-
R v Melrose,
...2020 ABCA 332 at para 35; R v EJB, 2018 ABCA 239, leave app denied 2019 CanLII 45254, at paras 56-57; Ford at para 10; R v Stephenson, 2019 ABCA 453 at para [8] The Crown has not advanced a s. 1 argument, should I find that the mandatory minimum sentence limits s. 12: Crown Brief at para 48......
Request a trial to view additional results