R. v. Sudweeks (M.), [2003] B.C.T.C. 1960 (SC)

JudgeSmith, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Case DateDecember 30, 2003
JurisdictionBritish Columbia
Citations[2003] B.C.T.C. 1960 (SC);2003 BCSC 1960

R. v. Sudweeks (M.), [2003] B.C.T.C. 1960 (SC)

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2004] B.C.T.C. TBEd. FE.023

Regina (respondent) v. Mark Sudweeks (appellant)

(02-14699; 2003 BCSC 1960)

Indexed As: R. v. Sudweeks (M.)

British Columbia Supreme Court

Williams Lake

Smith, J.

December 30, 2003.

Summary:

This headnote contains no summary.

Animals - Topic 3046

Cruelty to animals - Protected animals - Seizure of animals in distress (incl. warrantless search) - See paragraphs 69 to 122.

Animals - Topic 7250

Offences - Penalties - Causing or permitting an animal to be in distress - See paragraphs 139 to 144.

Civil Rights - Topic 1508

Property - General principles - Expectation of privacy - See paragraphs 69 to 122.

Civil Rights - Topic 1646

Property - Search and seizure - Unreasonable search and seizure defined - See paragraphs 69 to 122.

Civil Rights - Topic 1650.3

Property - Search and seizure - Warrantless search and seizure - Exigent circumstances - See paragraphs 69 to 122.

Civil Rights - Topic 8368

Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms - Denial of rights - Remedies - Exclusion of evidence - See paragraphs 69 to 122.

Courts - Topic 691

Judges - Disqualifications - Bias - Reasonable apprehension of bias - See paragraphs 30 to 68.

Criminal Law - Topic 7471

Summary conviction proceedings - Appeals - General - Evidence on appeal (incl. fresth evidence) - See paragraphs 32 to 36.

Criminal Law - Topic 7663

Summary conviction proceedings - Appeals - Grounds - Bias - See paragraphs 30 to 68.

Cases Noticed:

R. v. Nielsen and Stolar, [1988] 1 S.C.R. 480; 82 N.R. 280; 52 Man.R.(2d) 46; 62 C.R.(3d) 313; 40 C.C.C.(3d) 1, refd to. [para. 33].

R. v. Palmer, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 759; 30 N.R. 181; 50 C.C.C.(2d) 193, refd to. [para. 33].

R. v. Dunbar (A.A.) et al. (2003), 191 B.C.A.C. 223; 314 W.A.C. 223; 2003 BCCA 667, refd to. [para. 34].

R. v. Budai (M.K.) et al. (2001), 153 B.C.A.C. 98; 251 W.A.C. 98; 154 C.C.C.(3d) 289, 2001 BCCA 349, refd to. [para. 35].

R. v. R.D.S., [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484; 218 N.R. 1; 161 N.S.R.(2d) 241; 477 A.P.R. 241, refd to. [para. 37].

Lietky v. U.S. (1994), 114 S.Ct. 1147, refd to. [para. 37].

R. v. Brouillard, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 39; 57 N.R. 168; 44 C.R.(3d) 124; 17 C.C.C.(3d) 193, refd to. [para. 41].

R. v. Darlyn (1946), 88 C.C.C. 269 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 42].

R. v. Lefebvre (A.) et al. (1998), 102 B.C.A.C. 299; 166 W.A.C. 299; 123 C.C.C.(3d) 200 (Yuk. C.A.), refd to. [para. 43].

R. v. W., [1995] 4 S.C.R. 51; 206 N.R. 161; 96 O.A.C. 244; 44 C.R.(4th) 317, reving. (1994), 75 O.A.C. 130; 94 C.C.C.(3d) 441 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 44].

R. v. Tudor, [1990] B.C.J. No. 153 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 45].

R. v. Dubreuil (E.)(1998), 110 O.A.C. 135; 125 C.C.C.(3d) 355 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 45].

R. v. Geddes (E.K.)(1997), 88 B.C.A.C. 61; 144 W.A.C. 61 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 46].

R. v. Dubas (S.P.)(1995), 60 B.C.A.C. 202; 99 W.A.C. 202 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 46].

R. v. McKitka (1982), 66 C.C.C.(2d) 164 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 46].

R. v. Lynxleg (B.J.) (2002), 166 Man.R.(2d) 185; 278 W.A.C. 185; 168 C.C.C.(3d) 120 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 47].

R. v. Valley (1986), 13 O.A.C. 89; 26 C.C.C.(3d) 207 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 47].

R. v. Ellard (2003), 178 B.C.A.C. 199; 292 W.A.C. 199; 72 C.C.C.(3d) 28; 2003 BCCA 68, refd to. [para. 57].

R. v. Grant (D.), [1993] 3 S.C.R. 223; 159 N.R. 161; 35 B.C.A.C. 1; 57 W.A.C. 1; 84 C.C.C.(3d) 173, refd to. [para. 72].

R. v. Kokesch, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 3; 121 N.R. 161; 61 C.C.C.(3d) 207, refd to. [para. 79].

R. v. Collins, [1987] 1 S.C.R. 265; 74 N.R. 276; 33 C.C.C.(3d) 1, refd to. [para. 79].

R. v. Caslake (T.L.), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 51; 221 N.R. 281; 123 Man.R.(2d) 208; 159 W.A.C. 208; 121 C.C.C.(3d) 97, refd to. [para. 79].

R. v. Buhay (M.A.) (2003), 305 N.R. 158; 177 Man.R.(2d) 72; 304 W.A.C. 72; 174 C.C.C.(3d) 97 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 90].

R. v. Edwards (C.), [1996] 1 S.C.R. 128; 192 N.R. 81; 88 O.A.C. 321; 104 C.C.C.(3d) 136, refd to. [para. 91].

McDougall v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, [2003] B.C.T.C. 1604; 2003 BCSC 1604, refd to. [para. 96].

R. v. McIntosh (B.B.), [1995] 1 S.C.R. 686; 178 N.R. 161; 79 O.A.C. 81; 95 C.C.C.(3d) 481; 36 C.R.(4th) 171, refd to. [para. 97].

R. v. Godoy (V.), [1999] 1 S.C.R. 311; 235 N.R. 134; 117 O.A.C. 127; 131 C.C.C.(3d) 129, refd to. [para. 112].

R. v. Sanderson (D.W.)(2003), 170 O.A.C. 285; 64 O.R.(3d) 257 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 112].

R. v. Jamieson (J.) (2002), 171 B.C.A.C. 57; 280 W.A.C. 57; 166 C.C.C.(3d) 501; 2002 BCCA 411, refd to. [para. 112].

R. v. Feeney (M.), [1997] 2 S.C.R. 13; 212 N.R. 83; 91 B.C.A.C. 1; 148 W.A.C. 1; 115 C.C.C.(3d) 129, refd to. [para. 112].

R. v. Silveira (A.), [1995] 2 S.C.R. 297; 181 N.R. 161; 81 O.A.C. 161, refd to. [para. 117].

R. v. Harper, [1982] 1 S.C.R. 2; 40 N.R. 255; 65 C.C.C.(2d) 193, refd to. [para. 123].

R. v. Burke (J.) (No. 3), [1996] 1 S.C.R. 474; 194 N.R. 247; 139 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 147; 433 A.P.R. 147; 65 C.C.C.(2d) 193, refd to. [para. 130].

R. v. Shropshire (M.T.), [1995] 4 S.C.R. 227; 188 N.R. 284; 65 B.C.A.C. 37; 106 W.A.C. 37; 102 C.C.C.(3d) 193, refd to. [para. 143].

Statutes Noticed:

Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 372, sect. 1(2), sect. 1(3), sect. 11, sect. 13(1), sect. 13(2), sect. 14(1), sect. 14(2), sect. 15, sect. 22 [para. 69]; sect. 24(1), sect. 24(2), sect. 24(3) [para. 2].

Counsel:

R.H. Hawkins, for the Crown;

G. Wool, for the appellant.

This appeal was heard on June 26 and 27, 2003, by Smith, J., of the British Columbia Supreme Court, who delivered the following decision on December 30, 2003.

Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 practice notes
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Animals and the Law Part III
    • June 15, 2011
    ...144–45 R v Stewart, [1937] 1 WWR 400, [1937] SJ No 5 (Pol Ct) .................................. 81 R v Sudweeks, 2003 BCSC 1960 ......................................................... 110, 111, 117 R v Syncrude Canada Ltd, 2010 ABPC 229 .........................................................
  • Provincial Animal Welfare Legislation
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Animals and the Law Part II
    • June 15, 2011
    ...emaciation, disease, rot, f‌ilth, and stench among the corpses and living horses in R v Carter , 2006 ABPC 341. See also R v Sudweeks , 2003 BCSC 1960 [ Sudweeks ]; Marshall v British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals , 2007 BCSC 1750 [ Marshall ]; and Gerk , above n......
  • Ulmer v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, 2010 BCCA 519
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • October 27, 2010
    ...- Protected animals - Appeals or judicial review - [See Animals - Topic 3046 ]. Cases Noticed: R. v. Sudweeks (M.), [2003] B.C.T.C. 1960; 2003 BCSC 1960, refd to. [para. British Columbia Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals v. Sudweeks et al., [2002] B.C.A.C. Uned. 139; 2002 BCCA 49......
  • R. v. Gerling (M.L.), (2016) 383 B.C.A.C. 90 (CA)
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • November 5, 2015
    ...take steps to relieve their distress, the Chambers judge made reference to the decision of Madam Justice L. Smith in R. v. Sudweeks , 2003 BCSC 1960 where she said ... to satisfy the test, the constable must form the opinion that "the person apparently responsible for the animals ... had no......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
  • Ulmer v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, 2010 BCCA 519
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • October 27, 2010
    ...- Protected animals - Appeals or judicial review - [See Animals - Topic 3046 ]. Cases Noticed: R. v. Sudweeks (M.), [2003] B.C.T.C. 1960; 2003 BCSC 1960, refd to. [para. British Columbia Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals v. Sudweeks et al., [2002] B.C.A.C. Uned. 139; 2002 BCCA 49......
  • R. v. Gerling (M.L.), (2016) 383 B.C.A.C. 90 (CA)
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • November 5, 2015
    ...take steps to relieve their distress, the Chambers judge made reference to the decision of Madam Justice L. Smith in R. v. Sudweeks , 2003 BCSC 1960 where she said ... to satisfy the test, the constable must form the opinion that "the person apparently responsible for the animals ... had no......
  • R v Herntier, 2020 MBCA 95
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • October 6, 2020
    ...2001 BCCA 349 at paras 88-89, leave to appeal to the SCC refused, 2002 CarswellBC 238; R v Gumbly, 1996 NSCA 213; and R v Sudweeks, 2003 BCSC 1960 at paras [34]                      Here......
  • R. v. Gerling (M.L.), [2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 2503 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 10, 2013
    ...take steps to relieve their distress, the chambers judge made reference to the decision of Madam Justice L. Smith in R. v. Sudweeks , 2003 BCSC 1960 where she said ... to satisfy the test, the constable must form the opinion that 'the person apparently responsible for the animals ... h......
2 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Animals and the Law Part III
    • June 15, 2011
    ...144–45 R v Stewart, [1937] 1 WWR 400, [1937] SJ No 5 (Pol Ct) .................................. 81 R v Sudweeks, 2003 BCSC 1960 ......................................................... 110, 111, 117 R v Syncrude Canada Ltd, 2010 ABPC 229 .........................................................
  • Provincial Animal Welfare Legislation
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Animals and the Law Part II
    • June 15, 2011
    ...emaciation, disease, rot, f‌ilth, and stench among the corpses and living horses in R v Carter , 2006 ABPC 341. See also R v Sudweeks , 2003 BCSC 1960 [ Sudweeks ]; Marshall v British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals , 2007 BCSC 1750 [ Marshall ]; and Gerk , above n......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT