R. v. Summers (S.),

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeMcLachlin, C.J.C., LeBel, Abella, Rothstein, Cromwell, Karakatsanis and Wagner, JJ.
Citation[2014] N.R. TBEd. AP.004,2014 SCC 26,[2014] SCJ No 26 (QL),AZ-51063416,[2014] ACS no 26,[2014] 1 SCR 575,371 DLR (4th) 581,456 NR 1,[2014] CarswellOnt 4479,308 CCC (3d) 471
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Date11 April 2014

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
908 practice notes
  • R. v. Rousselle, 2025 SCC 35
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • November 14, 2025
    ...v. Canada (National Revenue), 2025 SCC 13; Bell ExpressVu Limited Partnership v. Rex, 2002 SCC 42, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 559; R. v. Summers, 2014 SCC 26, [2014] 1 S.C.R. 575; Canada (Canadian Human Rights Commission) v. Canada (Attorney General), 2011 SCC 53, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 471; Kosicki v. Toron......
  • R. v. Wolfe
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • October 18, 2024
    ...2018 SCC 25, [2018] 1 S.C.R. 696; R. v. D.L.W., 2016 SCC 22, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 402; La Presse inc. v. Quebec, 2023 SCC 22; R. v. Summers, 2014 SCC 26, [2014] 1 S.C.R. 575; R. v. T. (V.), [1992] 1 S.C.R. 749; R. v. Basque, 2023 SCC 18; R. v. Quesnelle, 2014 SCC 46, [2014] 2 S.C.R. 390; ATCO Ga......
  • Arabi v. Alberta et al.
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 23, 2014
    ...78]. Trang et al. v. Edmonton Remand Centre (Director) et al. (2010), 475 A.R. 1; 2010 ABQB 6, refd to. [para. 80]. R. v. Summers (S.) (2014), 456 N.R. 1; 316 O.A.C. 349; 2014 SCC 26, refd to. [para. R. v. Wust (L.W.) et al., [2000] 1 S.C.R. 455; 252 N.R. 332; 134 B.C.A.C. 236; 219 W.A.C. 2......
  • R v Wright
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • May 21, 2025
    ...designated analyst to establish its suitability. Parliament must be presumed to know the legal context in which it operates ( R v Summers, 2014 SCC 26 at para 55, [2014] 1 SCR 575 [ Summers]). By changing the statutory precondition from “suitable for use” (in the former s. 258(1)) to “certi......
  • Get Started for Free
822 cases
  • R. v. Rousselle, 2025 SCC 35
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • November 14, 2025
    ...v. Canada (National Revenue), 2025 SCC 13; Bell ExpressVu Limited Partnership v. Rex, 2002 SCC 42, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 559; R. v. Summers, 2014 SCC 26, [2014] 1 S.C.R. 575; Canada (Canadian Human Rights Commission) v. Canada (Attorney General), 2011 SCC 53, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 471; Kosicki v. Toron......
  • R. v. Wolfe
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • October 18, 2024
    ...2018 SCC 25, [2018] 1 S.C.R. 696; R. v. D.L.W., 2016 SCC 22, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 402; La Presse inc. v. Quebec, 2023 SCC 22; R. v. Summers, 2014 SCC 26, [2014] 1 S.C.R. 575; R. v. T. (V.), [1992] 1 S.C.R. 749; R. v. Basque, 2023 SCC 18; R. v. Quesnelle, 2014 SCC 46, [2014] 2 S.C.R. 390; ATCO Ga......
  • Arabi v. Alberta et al.
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 23, 2014
    ...78]. Trang et al. v. Edmonton Remand Centre (Director) et al. (2010), 475 A.R. 1; 2010 ABQB 6, refd to. [para. 80]. R. v. Summers (S.) (2014), 456 N.R. 1; 316 O.A.C. 349; 2014 SCC 26, refd to. [para. R. v. Wust (L.W.) et al., [2000] 1 S.C.R. 455; 252 N.R. 332; 134 B.C.A.C. 236; 219 W.A.C. 2......
  • R v Wright
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • May 21, 2025
    ...designated analyst to establish its suitability. Parliament must be presumed to know the legal context in which it operates ( R v Summers, 2014 SCC 26 at para 55, [2014] 1 SCR 575 [ Summers]). By changing the statutory precondition from “suitable for use” (in the former s. 258(1)) to “certi......
  • Get Started for Free
10 firm's commentaries
  • ONTARIO COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (JUNE 19 – JUNE 23, 2017)
    • Canada
    • LexBlog Canada
    • June 23, 2017
    ...the respondent P. Rochman, amicus curiae Keywords: Criminal Law, Child Abduction, Pre-Sentence Custody, Mental Health Act, R. v. Summers, 2014 SCC 26. R v. Charron, 2017 ONCA 513 [MacPherson, Blair and MacFarland JJ.A.] Counsel: A. Moustacalis, for the Appellant Scott Latimer, for the Respo......
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (January 21 – 25, 2019)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • January 31, 2019
    ...Crescent, 2011 ONCA 363, Ontario (Attorney General) v. 714 Railton Avenue, 2014 ONCA 397, R. v. Harrison, 2009 SCC 34, R. v. Summers, 2014 SCC 26 ONTARIO REVIEW BOARD Phillip (Re), 2019 ONCA 48 [Doherty, Miller and Trotter JJ.A.] Counsel: D.R. Medd, for the appellant J. Tatum, for the respo......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 16 – December 20, 2019)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • January 2, 2020
    ...Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, S.C. 2001, c. 27, s. 126, Criminal Code, s. 718, R. v. Lacasse, 2015 SCC 64, R. v. Summers, 2014 SCC 26, R. v. A.G., 2015 ONCA 159, R. v. L.M., 2008 SCC 31, R. v. Downes (2006), 79 O.R. (3d) 321, R. v. Pomanti, 2017 ONCA 48 R. v. A., 2019 ONCA 988 Key......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 9 – March 13, 2020)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • April 1, 2020
    ...Law, Possession of a Loaded Restricted Firearm Without a License, Possession of Cocaine, R. v. Duncan, 2016 ONCA 754, R. v. Summers, 2014 SCC 26, R. v. Ward-Jackson, 2018 ONSC 178 Ontario Review Board Decisions Koundakjian (Re), 2020 ONCA 191 Keywords: Ontario Review Board CIVIL DECISIONS A......
  • Get Started for Free
60 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Anatomy of Criminal Procedure. A Visual Guide to the Law Post-trial matters Special Post-conviction Procedures
    • June 15, 2019
    ...150 R v Suberu, 2009 SCC 33...................................................................................118 R v Summers, 2014 SCC 26 ......................................................382–83, 384, 385–86 R v Sutton, 2000 SCC 50.............................................................
  • Low Hanging Fruit . . . and Beyond: Canada's Drug Laws Meet the Charter
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law Society of Upper Canada Special Lectures 2017
    • June 24, 2021
    ...the Charter may afford individualized sentencing relief in cases where, as said by Karakatsanis J, for the Court, in R v Summers , [2014] 1 SCR 575 at para 73 [emphasis added], remand prisoners “who have suffered particularly harsh treatment , such as assaults in detention, can often look t......
  • Reliance on Extrinsic Aids
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Statutory Interpretation. Third Edition Analyzing the Entire Context
    • June 23, 2016
    ...at paras 37–39. 34 See, for example, Canadian National Railway Co v Canada (Attorney General) , 2014 SCC 40 at paras 44–47; R v Summers , 2014 SCC 26 at paras 6 and 54. Reliance on Extrinsic Aids 271 • how specifically the issue before the court is addressed: when the responsible minister a......
  • Aggravating and Mitigating Factors
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Sentencing: Principles and Practice, 2nd Edition
    • May 3, 2024
    ...sets of charges, there is a dynamic such that each impacts the ability to 82 Wust, supra note 81 at paras 1, 7, 9, 46. 83 R v Summers, 2014 SCC 26 at para 22. 84 Ibid at paras 23-27. See also Chapter 12, Post-Sentencing Issues. 85 Summers, supra note 83 at para 28. 86 Ibid at para 71. 87 Ib......
  • Get Started for Free