R. v. Suter (R.A.), 2015 ABPC 269

JudgeAnderson, P.C.J.
CourtProvincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
Case DateDecember 17, 2015
Citations2015 ABPC 269
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 practice notes
  • R. v. Suter, 2018 SCC 34
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • June 29, 2018
    ...(6th) 177 , [2016] A.J. No. 785 (QL), 2016 CarswellAlta 1461 (WL Can.), varying the sentence imposed by Anderson A.C.J. Prov. Ct., 2015 ABPC 269, 94 M.V.R. (6th) 91 , [2015] A.J. No. 1407 (QL), 2015 CarswellAlta 2333 (WL Can.). Appeal allowed in part, Gascon J. dissenting in Dino Botto......
  • Digest: R v Nahnybida, 2018 SKCA 72
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Law Society Case Digests
    • August 18, 2019
    ...38, 324 Sask R 142 R v Stellato, [1994] 2 SCR 478, 168 NR 190, 18 OR (3d) 800, 90 CCC (3d) 160, 31 CR (4th) 60, 3 MVR (3d) 1 R v Suter, 2015 ABPC 269, 94 MVR (6th) 91 R v Suter, 2016 ABCA 235, 341 CCC (3d) 21 R v Suter, 2018 SCC 34, 70 Alta LR (6th) 1 R v Usher, 2011 BCCA 271 R v Van Essen,......
  • R v Nahnybida, 2018 SKCA 72
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • August 30, 2018
    ...factor. This error, the Crown asserts, was the product of the trial judge’s erroneous interpretation of the trial decision in R v Suter, 2015 ABPC 269 [Suter], where a finding had been made that Mr. Suter was not impaired. The Crown argues that finding, along with erroneous advice Mr. Suter......
  • R. v. Nahnybida (M.), 2016 SKQB 245
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • July 22, 2016
    ...are arrived at subsequent to consideration of the unique qualities of the offence or offences and the offender. [111] In R v Suter, 2015 ABPC 269 [ Suter ] the Alberta Provincial Court considered Kresko and made the following observations: 65 ...The Court cannot accept that a sentence for t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
  • R. v. Suter, 2018 SCC 34
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • June 29, 2018
    ...(6th) 177 , [2016] A.J. No. 785 (QL), 2016 CarswellAlta 1461 (WL Can.), varying the sentence imposed by Anderson A.C.J. Prov. Ct., 2015 ABPC 269, 94 M.V.R. (6th) 91 , [2015] A.J. No. 1407 (QL), 2015 CarswellAlta 2333 (WL Can.). Appeal allowed in part, Gascon J. dissenting in Dino Botto......
  • R v Nahnybida, 2018 SKCA 72
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • August 30, 2018
    ...factor. This error, the Crown asserts, was the product of the trial judge’s erroneous interpretation of the trial decision in R v Suter, 2015 ABPC 269 [Suter], where a finding had been made that Mr. Suter was not impaired. The Crown argues that finding, along with erroneous advice Mr. Suter......
  • R. v. Nahnybida (M.), 2016 SKQB 245
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • July 22, 2016
    ...are arrived at subsequent to consideration of the unique qualities of the offence or offences and the offender. [111] In R v Suter, 2015 ABPC 269 [ Suter ] the Alberta Provincial Court considered Kresko and made the following observations: 65 ...The Court cannot accept that a sentence for t......
  • R. v. Vollrath (S.G.), 2016 ABPC 130
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • June 8, 2016
    ...been dealt with in this Court; the factual circumstances and the sentence imposed by this Court are set out in detail in R. v. Suter 2015 ABPC 269. [18] The truck in which Mr. Suter was seated drove about 3 blocks at which point a bag was placed over his head. After about 5 minutes the bag ......
1 books & journal articles
  • Digest: R v Nahnybida, 2018 SKCA 72
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Law Society Case Digests
    • August 18, 2019
    ...38, 324 Sask R 142 R v Stellato, [1994] 2 SCR 478, 168 NR 190, 18 OR (3d) 800, 90 CCC (3d) 160, 31 CR (4th) 60, 3 MVR (3d) 1 R v Suter, 2015 ABPC 269, 94 MVR (6th) 91 R v Suter, 2016 ABCA 235, 341 CCC (3d) 21 R v Suter, 2018 SCC 34, 70 Alta LR (6th) 1 R v Usher, 2011 BCCA 271 R v Van Essen,......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT