R. v. Sweet, 2018 BCSC 1696
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Marchand |
| Citation | 2018 BCSC 1696 |
| Docket Number | 104561-2 |
| Date | 01 October 2018 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
R. v. Razak, 2019 BCSC 815
...or wilfully blind to, M.F’s lack of consent to being touched. See: R. v. Ewanchuk, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 330 at paras. 25 and 42; R. v. Sweet, 2018 BCSC 1696 at paras. 116-121. [109] The final element of Count 1 requires that Mr. Razak caused bodily harm to M.F. in committing the sexual assault. ......
-
R. v. Thomas,
...territory of assumed or implied consent. [Emphasis in original.] [153] Counsel for Mr. Thomas took me to R. v. Sweet, 2018 BCSC 1696 for guidance on the defence of honest but mistaken belief in consent. In Sweet, Justice Marchand (as he then was) made the following [132]&#......
-
R. v. Tayo Tompouba, 2019 BCSC 1529
...assault, consent and honest but mistaken belief in communicated consent, I am revisiting many topics that I grappled with in R. v. Sweet, 2018 BCSC 1696. Since writing that decision, the Supreme Court of Canada has confirmed and clarified various principles in R. v. Barton, 2019 SCC 33. In ......
-
R. v. V.Z.,
...“yes.” Accordingly, the Court of Appeal rejected the appellant’s arguments. In the subsequent case of R. v. Sweet, 2018 BCSC 1696, Justice Marchand of the British Columbia Supreme Court held that this paragraph in the Court of Appeal’s decision left open the poss......
4 cases
-
R. v. Razak, 2019 BCSC 815
...or wilfully blind to, M.F’s lack of consent to being touched. See: R. v. Ewanchuk, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 330 at paras. 25 and 42; R. v. Sweet, 2018 BCSC 1696 at paras. 116-121. [109] The final element of Count 1 requires that Mr. Razak caused bodily harm to M.F. in committing the sexual assault. ......
-
R. v. Thomas,
...territory of assumed or implied consent. [Emphasis in original.] [153] Counsel for Mr. Thomas took me to R. v. Sweet, 2018 BCSC 1696 for guidance on the defence of honest but mistaken belief in consent. In Sweet, Justice Marchand (as he then was) made the following [132]&#......
-
R. v. Tayo Tompouba, 2019 BCSC 1529
...assault, consent and honest but mistaken belief in communicated consent, I am revisiting many topics that I grappled with in R. v. Sweet, 2018 BCSC 1696. Since writing that decision, the Supreme Court of Canada has confirmed and clarified various principles in R. v. Barton, 2019 SCC 33. In ......
-
R. v. V.Z.,
...“yes.” Accordingly, the Court of Appeal rejected the appellant’s arguments. In the subsequent case of R. v. Sweet, 2018 BCSC 1696, Justice Marchand of the British Columbia Supreme Court held that this paragraph in the Court of Appeal’s decision left open the poss......