R. v. T.J.M., 2021 SCC 6
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | Wagner, Richard; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah; Kasirer, Nicholas |
| Docket Number | 38944 |
| Date | 29 January 2021 |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2021 SCC 6 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
R v Stephan,
...to the principle that Parliament is presumed to avoid “superfluous or meaningless ... sections and parts of a legislative scheme”: R v TJM, 2021 SCC 6 at para 19, citing Bristol Myers Squibb Co. v Canada (Attorney General), 2005 SCC 26 at para 178, [2005] 1 SCR 533. As noted in R v Proulx, ......
-
Bellatrix Exploration Ltd (Re),
...(Health), 2012 SCC 3 at para 203 per Cromwell J, [2012] 1 SCR 23; R v Quesnelle, 2014 SCC 46 at paras 52-53, [2014] 2 SCR 390; R v M(TJ), 2021 SCC 6 at para 16, [2021] SCJ No 6 [17] The shared meaning principle is applied to accord with s 16 of the Constitution Act, 1982, s 133 of the Const......
-
R. v. Wheeler,
...Both of these sections refer to the election or deemed election by a young person in certain circumstances. In R. v. T.J.M. 2021 SCC 6, para. 7, the Supreme Court “Sections 13(2) and 13(3) apply where any of the three circumstances described in s. 67 of the YCJA as triggering a right......
-
Currie v Alberta (Director of SafeRoads),
...risk to persons or property. 15 The Adjudicator used the analytical framework for “care and control” that is set out in R v Boudreault, 2021 SCC 6 [ Boudreault] and held that because the Applicant was in the driver's seat he was in care or control of the vehicle unless he established that 1......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
R v Stephan,
...to the principle that Parliament is presumed to avoid “superfluous or meaningless ... sections and parts of a legislative scheme”: R v TJM, 2021 SCC 6 at para 19, citing Bristol Myers Squibb Co. v Canada (Attorney General), 2005 SCC 26 at para 178, [2005] 1 SCR 533. As noted in R v Proulx, ......
-
Bellatrix Exploration Ltd (Re),
...(Health), 2012 SCC 3 at para 203 per Cromwell J, [2012] 1 SCR 23; R v Quesnelle, 2014 SCC 46 at paras 52-53, [2014] 2 SCR 390; R v M(TJ), 2021 SCC 6 at para 16, [2021] SCJ No 6 [17] The shared meaning principle is applied to accord with s 16 of the Constitution Act, 1982, s 133 of the Const......
-
R. v. Wheeler,
...Both of these sections refer to the election or deemed election by a young person in certain circumstances. In R. v. T.J.M. 2021 SCC 6, para. 7, the Supreme Court “Sections 13(2) and 13(3) apply where any of the three circumstances described in s. 67 of the YCJA as triggering a right......
-
R. v. G.G.,
...them. [17] As the Supreme Court of Canada made clear recently in R. v. T.J.M., 2021 SCC 6, 453 D.L.R. (4th) 94, a superior court of criminal jurisdiction has jurisdiction under the YCJA only where one or more of the circumstances i......
Request a trial to view additional results