R. v. Tang (W.), [2015] O.A.C. Uned. 443 (CA)
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Doherty, Hourigan and Huscroft, JJ.A. |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Citation | [2015] O.A.C. Uned. 443 (CA),[2015] O.A.C. Uned. 443,2015 ONCA 470 |
| Date | 25 June 2015 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
17 practice notes
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (April 18 - 22, 2022)
...[2015] O.J. No. 6130 (C.J.), Bruff-Murphy v. Gunawardena, 2017 ONCA 502, leave to appeal refused, [2017] S.C.C.A. No. 343, R. v. Tang, 2015 ONCA 470, leave to appeal refused, [2015] S.C.C.A. No. 486, R. v. McManus, 2017 ONCA 188, R. v. T.A., 2015 ONCJ 624, R. v. Livingston, 2017 ONCJ 645, 3......
-
Table of cases
...leave to appeal ref’d 2009 CanLII 8412 (SCC) ..............................................................................197 R v Tang, 2015 ONCA 470, leave to appeal ref’d [2015] SCCA No 486 ............. 248 R v Tash, 2008 OJ No 200 (SCJ) .......................................................
-
Table of Cases
...202 Tang , R v , [2013] OJ No 749 (QL) (Ct J) .................................................. 226 Tang , R v , 2015 ONCA 470 ...................................................... 57, 148, 150 Taylor , R v , 2001 BCSC 1025 ............................................................ 126 ......
-
Opinion and Expert Evidence
...paras 34–37 [ Muller ]. The majority said this issue was not before them and disposed of the appeal on other grounds. See also R v Tang , 2015 ONCA 470, leave to appeal to SCC refused, [2015] SCCA No 486. There, an Ontario Court of Appeal panel permitted a forensic accountant to testify abo......
Get Started for Free
10 cases
-
R. v. Soni (J.), 2016 ABCA 231
...to conduct accident reconstructions. An employment relationship, however, is not a disqualifying factor for an expert: R. v Tang , 2015 ONCA 470 at para. 6. While the law has always noted the importance of objectivity in experts, there is no rule that expert witnesses cannot be investigator......
-
R. v. Charara,
...a “realistic concern” of potential bias or lack of impartiality, the analysis is a fact-driven exercise: see R. v. Tang, 2015 ONCA 470, at para. [55] In this case, Constable Kolody was asked directly whether he could testify in an unbi......
-
North American Financial Group Inc. v. Ontario Securities Commission,
...opinion during his evidence. His evidence simply laid out the movement of funds in and out of NAFG’s main bank account. In R. v. Tang, 2015 ONCA 470, 122 W.C.B. (2d) 411, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 36754 (April 2016), the Court of Appeal found that evidence as to the movement of fun......
-
Ontario (Natural Resources and Forestry) v. South Bruce Peninsula (Town),
...R v. Kresko, 2013 ONSC 1159, at paras. 97, 119 (accident reconstructionist). [28] White Burgess, at para. 49 (auditor); R. v. Tang, 2015 ONCA 470, at para. 6, leave to appeal refused, [2015] S.C.C.A. No. 486 (forensic accountant); Soni at para. 18 (police officer as accident reconstructioni......
Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (April 18 - 22, 2022)
...[2015] O.J. No. 6130 (C.J.), Bruff-Murphy v. Gunawardena, 2017 ONCA 502, leave to appeal refused, [2017] S.C.C.A. No. 343, R. v. Tang, 2015 ONCA 470, leave to appeal refused, [2015] S.C.C.A. No. 486, R. v. McManus, 2017 ONCA 188, R. v. T.A., 2015 ONCJ 624, R. v. Livingston, 2017 ONCJ 645, 3......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 22-26, 2015)
...for the appellant Siebenmorgen and Mabel Lai, for the respondent Keywords: Criminal Law, Fraud, Sentence, Parity Principl R v Tang, 2015 ONCA 470 [Doherty, Hourigan and Huscroft JJ.A.] Counsel: Tang, appearing in person Lacy, appearing as duty counsel Keywords: Endorsement, Criminal Law, Fr......
5 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...leave to appeal ref’d 2009 CanLII 8412 (SCC) ..............................................................................197 R v Tang, 2015 ONCA 470, leave to appeal ref’d [2015] SCCA No 486 ............. 248 R v Tash, 2008 OJ No 200 (SCJ) .......................................................
-
Table of Cases
...202 Tang , R v , [2013] OJ No 749 (QL) (Ct J) .................................................. 226 Tang , R v , 2015 ONCA 470 ...................................................... 57, 148, 150 Taylor , R v , 2001 BCSC 1025 ............................................................ 126 ......
-
Opinion and Expert Evidence
...paras 34–37 [ Muller ]. The majority said this issue was not before them and disposed of the appeal on other grounds. See also R v Tang , 2015 ONCA 470, leave to appeal to SCC refused, [2015] SCCA No 486. There, an Ontario Court of Appeal panel permitted a forensic accountant to testify abo......
-
Police Experts
...11 at para 18. The Court also noted that forensic fire experts also tend to be involved in an arson investigation. See also R v Tang , 2015 ONCA 470 at para 6. 15 2017 ONCA 188. © [2022] Emond Montgomery Publications. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 7 Police Experts 149 impartial expert eviden......
Get Started for Free