R. v. Taylor (A.), (2008) 250 B.C.A.C. 317 (YukCA)

JudgeRowles, Donald and Saunders, JJ.A.
CourtCourt of Appeal (Yukon Territory)
Case DateJanuary 18, 2008
JurisdictionYukon
Citations(2008), 250 B.C.A.C. 317 (YukCA);2008 YKCA 1

R. v. Taylor (A.) (2008), 250 B.C.A.C. 317 (YukCA);

    416 W.A.C. 317

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2008] B.C.A.C. TBEd. FE.018

Regina (respondent) v. Arthur Taylor (appellant)

(YU586; 2008 YKCA 1)

Indexed As: R. v. Taylor (A.)

Yukon Court of Appeal

Rowles, Donald and Saunders, JJ.A.

January 18, 2008.

Summary:

An accused was convicted of driving while disqualified and was sentenced to eight months' imprisonment and a one year driving suspension. The accused applied for leave to appeal the term of imprisonment. The accused did not seek leave to appeal the driving suspension.

The Yukon Court of Appeal granted leave, but dismissed the appeal.

Criminal Law - Topic 5606

Punishments (sentence) - General principles - Increased punishment for prior convictions - The accused was convicted of driving while disqualified - The accused drove his wife to work because her car had broken down and she was unable to drive his standard shift vehicle - The accused had five prior drinking and driving convictions and driving prohibitions - This was his second conviction for driving while disqualified - The first conviction was recorded in 1997 when he was also convicted of impaired driving causing death - On that occasion he was sentenced to four years' imprisonment for the impaired driving charge and one year concurrent for driving while disqualified - The accused was in the final year of his 10 year driving prohibition when the current offence occurred - First offence since the 1997 convictions - Had a history of alcohol abuse - The trial judge sentenced the accused to eight months' imprisonment and a one year driving suspension - The Yukon Court of Appeal held that the sentence of eight months' imprisonment was not unreasonable - The key point of reference was the one year sentence for breaching the driving prohibition in 1997 - Normally, repeat offences attracted a great penalty, although it could be appreciated why the judge did not find it necessary to go higher than eight months, given that there were no aggravating factors surrounding the manner of driving and the accused's record had been clear for almost 10 years.

Criminal Law - Topic 5885

Sentence - Driving while disqualified or suspended - [See Criminal Law - Topic 5606 ].

Cases Noticed:

R. v. Joe (A.F.), [2005] Yukon Cases (TerrCt) 21; 2005 YKTC 21, refd to. [para. 12].

R. v. Marada, [1999] Y.J. No. 9 (Terr. Ct.), refd to. [para. 12].

R. v. Redies (A.R.), [2004] Yukon Cases (TerrCt) 88; 2004 YKTC 88, refd to. [para. 12].

R. v. Clement, 2007 YKTC 30, refd to. [para. 12].

R. v. Fusion, 2005 BCPC 642, refd to. [para. 12].

R. v. Sinclair, [1990] B.C.J. No. 1896 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 14].

R. v. Rothenberger (1992), 10 B.C.A.C. 46; 21 W.A.C. 46; 35 M.V.R.(2d) 207, refd to. [para. 15].

Counsel:

K.P. Wenckebach, for the appellant;

D.A. McWhinnie, for the (Crown) respondent.

This appeal was heard at Vancouver, British Columbia, on January 18, 2008, by Rowles, Donald and Saunders, JJ.A., of the Yukon Court of Appeal. Donald, J.A., delivered the following oral reasons for judgment for the court on the same date.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 practice notes
  • R. v. Billard (A.A.), 2011 NSPC 31
    • Canada
    • Nova Scotia Provincial Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • June 3, 2011
    ...refd to. [para. 46]. R. v. Yazlovasky (A.D.) (2004), 357 A.R. 334; 334 W.A.C. 334 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 57]. R. v. Taylor (A.) (2008), 250 B.C.A.C. 317; 416 W.A.C. 317 (Yuk. C.A.), refd to. [para. 59]. R. v. Bear (L.E.) (1994), 120 Sask.R. 294; 68 W.A.C. 294 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 61]. R......
  • R. v. Cooper, 2019 BCCA 325
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • September 4, 2019
    ...given Mr. Cooper’s repeated violations of previous driving prohibitions. As Mr. Justice Donald observed in R. v. Taylor, 2008 YKCA 1 at para. 10: “driving prohibitions must be obeyed and breaches sanctioned in a meaningful way”. In that case, an eight-mon......
  • R. v. Samson (S.J.), [2013] Yukon Cases Uned. 36
    • Canada
    • Territorial Court of Yukon (Canada)
    • April 12, 2013
    ...With respect to the significance of driving while prohibited and what courts are to consider, I have looked at the R . v. Taylor case, 2008 YKCA 1. In this case, it was an appeal of a sentence of eight months in jail for driving while disqualified. Mr. Taylor had a prior driving while disqu......
  • R. v. Leatherbarrow (A.J.), [2010] Yukon Cases Uned. (TC) 89
    • Canada
    • Yukon Territorial Court of Yukon (Canada)
    • August 11, 2010
    ...period of custody, in the range of nine months or more. Crown counsel relies on the Yukon Court of Appeal decision of R. v. Taylor , 2008 YKCA 1. In that particular case, the Court of Appeal upheld a decision of this Court, which imposed an eight month jail term for driving while disqualifi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • R. v. Billard (A.A.), 2011 NSPC 31
    • Canada
    • Nova Scotia Provincial Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • June 3, 2011
    ...refd to. [para. 46]. R. v. Yazlovasky (A.D.) (2004), 357 A.R. 334; 334 W.A.C. 334 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 57]. R. v. Taylor (A.) (2008), 250 B.C.A.C. 317; 416 W.A.C. 317 (Yuk. C.A.), refd to. [para. 59]. R. v. Bear (L.E.) (1994), 120 Sask.R. 294; 68 W.A.C. 294 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 61]. R......
  • R. v. Cooper, 2019 BCCA 325
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • September 4, 2019
    ...given Mr. Cooper’s repeated violations of previous driving prohibitions. As Mr. Justice Donald observed in R. v. Taylor, 2008 YKCA 1 at para. 10: “driving prohibitions must be obeyed and breaches sanctioned in a meaningful way”. In that case, an eight-mon......
  • R. v. Samson (S.J.), [2013] Yukon Cases Uned. 36
    • Canada
    • Territorial Court of Yukon (Canada)
    • April 12, 2013
    ...With respect to the significance of driving while prohibited and what courts are to consider, I have looked at the R . v. Taylor case, 2008 YKCA 1. In this case, it was an appeal of a sentence of eight months in jail for driving while disqualified. Mr. Taylor had a prior driving while disqu......
  • R. v. Leatherbarrow (A.J.), [2010] Yukon Cases Uned. (TC) 89
    • Canada
    • Yukon Territorial Court of Yukon (Canada)
    • August 11, 2010
    ...period of custody, in the range of nine months or more. Crown counsel relies on the Yukon Court of Appeal decision of R. v. Taylor , 2008 YKCA 1. In that particular case, the Court of Appeal upheld a decision of this Court, which imposed an eight month jail term for driving while disqualifi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT