R. v. Taylor (H.R.), [2005] Yukon Cases (TerrCt) 15
Judge | Lilles, C.J.T.C. |
Court | Territorial Court of Yukon (Canada) |
Case Date | February 18, 2005 |
Jurisdiction | Yukon |
Citations | [2005] Yukon Cases (TerrCt) 15;2005 YKTC 15 |
R. v. Taylor (H.R.), [2005] Yukon Cases (TerrCt) 15
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [2005] Yukon Cases TBEd. AP.068
Regina v. Henry Raymond Taylor
(03-00172G; 2005 YKTC 15)
Indexed As: R. v. Taylor (H.R.)
Yukon Territorial Court
Whitehorse
Lilles, C.J.T.C.
February 18, 2005.
Summary:
This headnote contains no summary.
Civil Rights - Topic 3157.3
Trials - Due process, fundamental justice and fair hearings - Criminal and quasi-criminal proceedings - Procedure contrary to fundamental justice - See paragraphs 17 to 22.
Criminal Law - Topic 4224
Procedure - Pleas - Plea of autrefois convict - See paragraphs 12 to 16.
Criminal Law - Topic 5731
Punishments (sentence) - Probation or probation order - Breach of - See paragraphs 1 to 23.
Cases Noticed:
R. v. Dobson (1987), 22 O.A.C. 119; 38 C.C.C.(3d) 434 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 13].
R. v. Melanson (J.) (2001), 142 O.A.C. 184 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 14].
R. v. Sanver (1973), 6 N.B.R.(2d) 192; 12 C.C.C.(2d) 105 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 14].
R. v. Turmel (J.C.) (1996), 92 O.A.C. 215; 109 C.C.C.(3d) 162 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 14].
R. v. Power (E.), [1994] 1 S.C.R. 601; 165 N.R. 241; 117 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 269; 365 A.P.R. 269, refd to. [para. 19].
R. v. Keyowski, [1988] 1 S.C.R. 657; 83 N.R. 296; 65 Sask.R. 122, refd to. [para. 19].
Counsel:
Michael Cozens, for the Crown;
Malcolm Campbell, for the defence.
This case was heard before Lilles, C.J.T.C., of the Yukon Territorial Court, who delivered the following judgment on February 18, 2005.
Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
R. v. Chambers (D.F.), 2013 YKTC 77
...there is precedent for a double punishment argument under s. 7: see for example R. v. Dobson (1987), 22 O.A.C. 119 (C.A.); R. v. Taylor , 2005 YKTC 15. [84] While I accept that an argument such as this one may be more frequently made pursuant to s. 11(h), I do not accept that the argument c......
-
R. v. Chambers (D.F.), 2013 YKTC 77
...there is precedent for a double punishment argument under s. 7: see for example R. v. Dobson (1987), 22 O.A.C. 119 (C.A.); R. v. Taylor , 2005 YKTC 15. [84] While I accept that an argument such as this one may be more frequently made pursuant to s. 11(h), I do not accept that the argument c......