R v TB, 2018 ABPC 193

JudgeHonourable Judge D. Mah
Citation2018 ABPC 193
CourtProvincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
Docket Number160240743Y1
Date01 October 2018
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • R v DCS,
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • 13 Octubre 2022
    ...accused or with any other person, ….”  Counsel for the accused relies on the purpose of s 276 and the case of R v TB, 2018 ABPC 193. [14]           First, counsel for the accused argues the wording in s 276 requires sexual......
  • R. v. R. I., 2021 ONSC 3236
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 30 Abril 2021
    ...to support his interpretation of s. 276 and relies more specifically on R. v. S.A., 2015 ONSC 6942, paras. 18 - 19 and R. v. T. B., 2018 ABPC 193, paras. 14 -15 in support of his argument that s. 276 is inapplicable to the solitary viewing of pornography. The accused also argues that throug......
2 cases
  • R v DCS,
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • 13 Octubre 2022
    ...accused or with any other person, ….”  Counsel for the accused relies on the purpose of s 276 and the case of R v TB, 2018 ABPC 193. [14]           First, counsel for the accused argues the wording in s 276 requires sexual......
  • R. v. R. I., 2021 ONSC 3236
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 30 Abril 2021
    ...to support his interpretation of s. 276 and relies more specifically on R. v. S.A., 2015 ONSC 6942, paras. 18 - 19 and R. v. T. B., 2018 ABPC 193, paras. 14 -15 in support of his argument that s. 276 is inapplicable to the solitary viewing of pornography. The accused also argues that throug......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT