R. v. Therens, (1985) 59 N.R. 122 (SCC)

JudgeDickson, C.J.C., Ritchie, Beetz, Estey, McIntyre, Chouinard, Lamer, Wilson and Le Dain, JJ.
CourtSupreme Court of Canada
Case DateThursday May 23, 1985
JurisdictionCanada (Federal)
Citations(1985), 59 N.R. 122 (SCC);[1985] 1 SCR 613;1985 CanLII 29 (SCC);18 DLR (4th) 655;[1985] 4 WWR 286;38 Alta LR (2d) 99;18 CCC (3d) 481;45 CR (3d) 97;59 NR 122;[1985] CarswellSask 851;JE 85-551;[1985] SCJ No 30 (QL);13 CRR 193;14 WCB 190;[1985] ACS no 30;32 MVR 153;40 Sask R 122

R. v. Therens (1985), 59 N.R. 122 (SCC)

MLB headnote and full text

R. v. Therens

(No. 17692)

Indexed As: R. v. Therens

Supreme Court of Canada

Dickson, C.J.C., Ritchie, Beetz, Estey, McIntyre, Chouinard, Lamer, Wilson and Le Dain, JJ.

May 23, 1985.

Summary:

Therens was charged with driving with an excessive blood alcohol content contrary to s. 236(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada. The trial judge dismissed the charge. The trial judge ruled inadmissible certificate evidence respecting a breath sample taken from Therens because the police failed to give Therens notice of his rights as required by s. 10 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms 1982. The Crown appealed to the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal.

The Saskatchewan Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal - see 23 Sask.R. 81. The Crown appealed.

The Supreme Court of Canada dismissed the appeal.

Civil Rights - Topic 3604

Detention - Warning or notice of rights - Detention defined for purposes of the Charter - Therens, a driver, was involved in a motor vehicle accident - A policeman demanded that Therens accompany the policeman for purposes of providing a breath sample for analysis - The Supreme Court of Canada held that in such circumstances the driver was detained for purposes of s. 10 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Civil Rights - Topic 3604

Detention - Warning or notice of rights - Detention defined for purposes of the Charter - A judge of the Supreme Court of Canada stated that a person is detained (within s. 10 of the Charter) when a police officer assumes control over the movement of a person by a demand or direction which may have significant legal consequences (see paragraph 32).

Civil Rights - Topic 8368

Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms - Denial of rights - Remedies, exclusion of evidence - The police obtained a breath sample from Therens but failed to advise Therens of his right to counsel - Therens was charged with driving with an excessive blood alcohol content and at trial the Crown offered certificate evidence of the results of analysis of Therens' breath sample - The Supreme Court of Canada held that such evidence must be excluded under s. 24(2) of the Charter - The court stated that to admit such evidence would clearly "bring the administration of justice into disrepute" (see paragraphs 8, 74).

Civil Rights - Topic 8348

Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms - Application, exceptions - Reasonable limits prescribed by law (s. 1) - Therens provided a breath sample under s. 235(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada but Therens was not advised of his right to counsel as required by s. 10(b) of the Charter - The Supreme Court of Canada stated that s. 235(1) did not purport to limit Therens' rights under s. 10(b) of the Charter - The court stated that in such circumstances s. 1 of the Charter had no application (see paragraphs 6, 60 and 66).

Civil Rights - Topic 3604

Detention - Warning or notice of rights - Detention defined for purposes of the Charter - A judge of the Supreme Court of Canada stated that where a peace officer makes a demand on a person, it is not realistic to say that the person is free to refuse to comply with the demand (see paragraphs 35, 36).

Civil Rights - Topic 8550

Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms - Interpretation, particular clauses - Bring the administration of justice into disrepute (s. 24(2)) - A judge of the Supreme Court of Canada stated that whether evidence must be excluded because its admission would bring the administration of justice into disrepute is a question of law (see paragraph 57).

Cases Noticed:

R. v. Chromiak, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 471; 29 N.R. 441, refd to. [para. 18].

Minister of Home Affairs v. Fisher, [1980] A.C. 319, refd to. [para. 21].

R. v. Currie (1983), 56 N.S.R.(2d) 583; 117 A.P.R. 583; 4 C.C.C.(3d) 217 (N.S.S.C.A.D.), refd to. [para. 24].

R. v. Trask (1983), 42 Nfld. & P.E.I. R. 30; 122 A.P.R. 30; 6 C.C.C.(3d) 132 (Nfld. C.A.), refd to. [para. 24].

R. v. Rahn (1984), 50 A.R. 43; 11 C.C.C.(3d) 152 (Alta. C.A.), refd to. [para. 24].

R. v. Simmons (1984), 3 O.A.C. 1; 11 C.C.C.(3d) 193, refd to. [para. 24].

Hunter v. Southam Inc., [1984] 2 S.C.R. 145; 55 N.R. 241, refd to. [para. 27].

Law Society of Upper Canada v. Skapinker, [1984] 1 S.C.R. 357; 53 N.R. 169, refd to. [para. 27].

R. v. Talbourdet (1984), 32 Sask.R. 5; 12 C.C.C.(3d) 173, refd to. [para. 28].

R. v. Hogan, [1975] 2 S.C.R. 574; 2 N.R. 343, refd to. [para. 35].

R. v. Rothman, [1981] 1 S.C.R. 640; 35 N.R. 485, refd to. [para. 47].

R. v. Collins (1983), 5 C.C.C.(3d) 141 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 48].

R. v. Cohen (1983), 5 C.C.C.(3d) 156 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 48].

R. v. Stevens (1983), 58 N.S.R.(2d) 413; 123 A.P.R. 413; 7 C.C.C.(3d) 260 (N.S.S.C.A.D.), refd to. [para. 48].

R. v. Chapin (1983), 7 C.C.C.(3d) 538 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 48].

R. v. Manninen (1983), 1 O.A.C. 199; 8 C.C.C.(3d) 193 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 48].

Miranda v. Arizona (1966), 384 U.S. 436 (USSC), refd to. [para. 71].

Statutes Noticed:

Criminal Code of Canada, sect. 234.1, sect. 235 [para. 11].

Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms 1982, sect. 10, sect. 24 [para. 11].

Constitution Act, 1982, sect. 52 [para. 27].

Canadian Bill of Rights [para. 27]; sect. 2(c) [para. 28].

Authors and Works Noticed:

Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously (1977), page 132 [para. 27].

Fleming, The Law of Torts, 6th Ed., 1983, page 171 [para. 44].

Gibson, D., Determining Disrepute: Opinion Polls and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, 1983, 61 Can. Bar Rev. 377 [para. 57].

Counsel:

D. Murray Brown, James MacPherson and Andrew Petter, for the appellant;

Robert Skinner and Vikas Khaladkar, for the respondent;

S.R. Fainstein, for the Attorney General of Canada;

Edward Then, Q.C., for the Attorney General for Ontario;

Jean-Francois Dionne, for the Attorney General of Quebec.

This appeal was heard by Dickson, C.J.C., Ritchie, Beetz, Estey, McIntyre, Chouinard, Lamer, Wilson and Le Dain, JJ., of the Supreme Court of Canada on June 21, 1984.

Ritchie, J., did not take part in the judgment.

The judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada was delivered on May 23, 1985, and the following opinions were filed:

Estey, J., concurring in part with Le Dain, J. - see paragraphs 1 to 9;

Le Dain, J., dissenting - see paragraphs 10 to 58;

McIntyre, J., dissenting - see paragraph 59;

Dickson, C.J.C., concurring in part with Le Dain, J., and in part with Lamer, J. - see paragraphs 60 to 63;

Lamer, J., concurring in part with Estey, J., and in part with Le Dain, J. - see paragraphs 64 to 75.

Beetz, Chouinard and Wilson, JJ., concurred with Estey, J.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
1385 practice notes
  • R. v. Douglas (R.D.), (2005) 387 A.R. 1 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • February 28, 2005
    ...C.C.C.(3d) 298; 15 C.R.(6th) 282; 112 C.R.R.(2d) 297; 2003 CarswellOnt 4448 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 313, footnote 103]. R. v. Therens, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 613; 59 N.R. 122; 40 Sask.R. 122; 18 C.C.C.(3d) 481; 45 C.R.(3d) 97; [1985] 4 W.W.R. 286; 32 M.V.R. 153; 18 D.L.R.(4th) 655; 13 C.R.R. 193; ......
  • R. v. Grant (D.), (2009) 253 O.A.C. 124 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court of Canada
    • April 24, 2008
    ...W.A.C. 45 ; 2004 SCC 42 , refd to. [para. 21]. R. v. Hebert, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 151 ; 110 N.R. 1 , refd to. [para. 22]. R. v. Therens, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 613; 59 N.R. 122 ; 40 Sask.R. 122 , consd. [para. 25]; refd to. [para. R. v. Grafe (1987), 22 O.A.C. 280 ; 36 C.C.C.(3d) 267 (C.A.), re......
  • R. v. Morgentaler, (1988) 82 N.R. 1 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court of Canada
    • January 28, 1988
    ...291; 27 B.L.R. 297; 33 Alta. L.R.(2d) 193; 9 C.R.R. 355; 14 C.C.C.(3d) 97; 11 D.L.R.(4th) 641, refd to. [para. 10]. R. v. Therens, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 613; 59 N.R. 122; 40 Sask.R. 122; [1985] 4 W.W.R. 286; 18 C.C.C.(3d) 481; 32 M.V.R. 153; 18 D.L.R.(4th) 655, refd to. [para. Singh v. Minister o......
  • R. v. Stillman (W.W.D.), (1997) 185 N.B.R.(2d) 1 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court of Canada
    • March 20, 1997
    ...261 (F.C.A.), refd to. [para. 154]. R. v. Truchanek (1984), 39 C.R.(3d) 137 (B.C. Co. Ct.), refd to. [para. 154]. R. v. Therens, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 613; 59 N.R. 122; 40 Sask.R. 122; 18 D.L.R.(4th) 655; [1985] 4 W.W.R. 286; 32 M.V.R. 153; 45 C.R.(3d) 97; 18 C.C.C.(3d) 481, refd to. [para. Dolph......
  • Get Started for Free
1195 cases
  • R. v. Douglas (R.D.), (2005) 387 A.R. 1 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • February 28, 2005
    ...C.C.C.(3d) 298; 15 C.R.(6th) 282; 112 C.R.R.(2d) 297; 2003 CarswellOnt 4448 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 313, footnote 103]. R. v. Therens, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 613; 59 N.R. 122; 40 Sask.R. 122; 18 C.C.C.(3d) 481; 45 C.R.(3d) 97; [1985] 4 W.W.R. 286; 32 M.V.R. 153; 18 D.L.R.(4th) 655; 13 C.R.R. 193; ......
  • R. v. Grant (D.), (2009) 253 O.A.C. 124 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court of Canada
    • April 24, 2008
    ...W.A.C. 45 ; 2004 SCC 42 , refd to. [para. 21]. R. v. Hebert, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 151 ; 110 N.R. 1 , refd to. [para. 22]. R. v. Therens, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 613; 59 N.R. 122 ; 40 Sask.R. 122 , consd. [para. 25]; refd to. [para. R. v. Grafe (1987), 22 O.A.C. 280 ; 36 C.C.C.(3d) 267 (C.A.), re......
  • R. v. Morgentaler, (1988) 82 N.R. 1 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court of Canada
    • January 28, 1988
    ...291; 27 B.L.R. 297; 33 Alta. L.R.(2d) 193; 9 C.R.R. 355; 14 C.C.C.(3d) 97; 11 D.L.R.(4th) 641, refd to. [para. 10]. R. v. Therens, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 613; 59 N.R. 122; 40 Sask.R. 122; [1985] 4 W.W.R. 286; 18 C.C.C.(3d) 481; 32 M.V.R. 153; 18 D.L.R.(4th) 655, refd to. [para. Singh v. Minister o......
  • R. v. Stillman (W.W.D.), (1997) 185 N.B.R.(2d) 1 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court of Canada
    • March 20, 1997
    ...261 (F.C.A.), refd to. [para. 154]. R. v. Truchanek (1984), 39 C.R.(3d) 137 (B.C. Co. Ct.), refd to. [para. 154]. R. v. Therens, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 613; 59 N.R. 122; 40 Sask.R. 122; 18 D.L.R.(4th) 655; [1985] 4 W.W.R. 286; 32 M.V.R. 153; 45 C.R.(3d) 97; 18 C.C.C.(3d) 481, refd to. [para. Dolph......
  • Get Started for Free
190 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Constitutional Law. Fifth Edition Conclusion
    • August 3, 2017
    ...482, 485 R. v. Swain, [1991] 1 S.C.R. 933, 5 C.R. (4th) 253, 63 C.C.C. (3d) 481 ......123, 421 R. v. Therens, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 613, 18 D.L.R. (4th) 655 ..............................414, 435 R. v. Thomsen, [1988] 1 S.C.R. 640, 40 C.C.C. (3d) 411, 63 C.R. (3d) 1 .......... 435 R. v. Van der P......
  • How the Charter has failed non-citizens in Canada: reviewing thirty years of Supreme Court of Canada jurisprudence.
    • Canada
    • McGill Law Journal Vol. 58 No. 3, March 2013
    • March 1, 2013
    ...provisions. The covenant also contains explicit protection against expulsion (ibid, art 13). (70) Supra note 56. (71) See R v Therens, [1985] 1 SCR 613, 18 DLR (4th) 655 (holding that subsection 235(1) of the Criminal Code (RSC 1970, c C-34), as it was then--allowing a police officer to dem......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive The Law of Evidence. Seventh Edition
    • August 29, 2015
    ...(3d) 230, 2009 ONCA 223 ..................................................................................... 37, 524 R. v. Therens, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 613, 45 C.R. (3d) 97, [1985] S.C.J. No. 30 .............................................................. 308, 383, 386, 397 R. v. Thériault, ......
  • Rights in the Criminal Process
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive The Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Fifth Edition
    • August 29, 2013
    ...the Charter right is engaged only 94 Lavallee, Rackel and Heintz v Canada , [2002] 3 SCR 209; Maranda v Richer , [2003] 3 SCR 193. 95 [1985] 1 SCR 613, 18 DLR (4th) 655. 96 ibid at 642 (SCR). 97 ibid at 644 (SCR). 98 Mann , above note 73 at para 19. 99 R v Grant , 2009 SCC 32 at paras 24 an......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT