R v Tummillo, 2018 MBCA 95
| Jurisdiction | Manitoba |
| Judge | Chief Justice Richard J. Chartier,Madam Justice Diana M. Cameron,Madam Justice Janice L. leMaistre |
| Citation | 2018 MBCA 95 |
| Date | 04 October 2018 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Manitoba) |
| Docket Number | AR17-30-08891 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
R. v. Tetreault, 2018 ABCA 397
...at any stage of the process after initially electing to waive the preliminary inquiry in the Provincial Court: see also R v Tummillo, 2018 MBCA 95 at paras [28] Following the hearing of this matter, this Court released its decision in R v Scher, 2018 ABCA 365, [2018] AJ No 1290. The parties......
-
R. v. Virk, 2019 BCSC 1271
...In explicit waiver, the court need not determine if the time waived is in fact delay: see R. v. Tummillo, 2018 MBCA 95 at paras. 40-45. An implicit waiver must be no less clear and unequivocal: see R. v. Klassen, 2018 ABCA 258 at paras. 78-87 [42] ......
-
R v KGK, 2019 MBCA 9
...Morin, remains relevant to appeals that engage principles under Jordan. Also see R v Johnston, 2018 MBCA 8 at para 25; and R v Tummillo, 2018 MBCA 95. [53] A judge’s findings of fact are entitled to deference unless the judge made a palpable and overriding error. Whether or not the judge ha......
-
R v Clemons, 2020 MBCA 4
...deference (see Jordan at para 65; see also R v Cody, 2017 SCC 31 at paras 31-33; R v Schenkels, 2017 MBCA 62 at para 52; and R v Tummillo, 2018 MBCA 95 at paras 47-48). [7] ......
4 cases
-
R. v. Tetreault, 2018 ABCA 397
...at any stage of the process after initially electing to waive the preliminary inquiry in the Provincial Court: see also R v Tummillo, 2018 MBCA 95 at paras [28] Following the hearing of this matter, this Court released its decision in R v Scher, 2018 ABCA 365, [2018] AJ No 1290. The parties......
-
R. v. Virk, 2019 BCSC 1271
...In explicit waiver, the court need not determine if the time waived is in fact delay: see R. v. Tummillo, 2018 MBCA 95 at paras. 40-45. An implicit waiver must be no less clear and unequivocal: see R. v. Klassen, 2018 ABCA 258 at paras. 78-87 [42] ......
-
R v KGK, 2019 MBCA 9
...Morin, remains relevant to appeals that engage principles under Jordan. Also see R v Johnston, 2018 MBCA 8 at para 25; and R v Tummillo, 2018 MBCA 95. [53] A judge’s findings of fact are entitled to deference unless the judge made a palpable and overriding error. Whether or not the judge ha......
-
R v Clemons, 2020 MBCA 4
...deference (see Jordan at para 65; see also R v Cody, 2017 SCC 31 at paras 31-33; R v Schenkels, 2017 MBCA 62 at para 52; and R v Tummillo, 2018 MBCA 95 at paras 47-48). [7] ......