R. v. A.V., 2020 ONCA 58

JurisdictionOntario
JudgePardu, Brown and Huscroft JJ.A.
Docket NumberC64964
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
Date29 January 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (January 27 – January 31, 2020)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 7 Abril 2020
    ...Freedoms, s. 10(b), 24(2), R. v. G.T.D., 2018 SCC 7, R. v. Plaha (2004), 188 C.C.C. (3d) 289 (ONCA), R. v. Grant, 2009 SCC 32 R. v. A.V., 2020 ONCA 58 (Publication Ban) Keywords: Criminal Law, Sexual Interference, Sexual Exploitation, Sexual Assault, Evidence, Admissibility, Prior Consisten......
  • R. v. M., 2020 ONSC 3636
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 15 Junio 2020
    ...47; R. v. G.J.S., 2020 ONSC 7251 at paras. 46-51; R. v. Zou, 2017 ONCA 90; R. v. Mackenzie, 2015 ONCA 93 at paras. 10-11; R. v. A.V., 2020 ONCA 58 at paras. 19-20; R. v. D.K., 2020 ONCA at para. 46 By contrast, in this case, there is nothing in the trial judge’s reasons to suggest that he i......
  • R. v. D.K., 2020 ONCA 79
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 3 Febrero 2020
    ...use of the utterance: see Dinardo, at para. 36; R. v. J.A.T., 2012 ONCA 177, 290 O.A.C. 130, at paras. 97-100; and R. v. A.V., 2020 ONCA 58, at para. 20. On the other hand, the trial judge purports to engage the narrative as circumstantial evidence exception discussed in Khan. The trial jud......
  • R. v. Hayes,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 25 Agosto 2022
    ...in the bedroom and then on her bed. Although the location of the alleged sexual assault can be considered a minor detail (see R. v. A.V., 2020 ONCA 58), in this case, it is important as the location of the kissing/touching as suggested by the mother lines up with J.H.’s evidence. [18......
3 cases
  • R. v. M., 2020 ONSC 3636
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 15 Junio 2020
    ...47; R. v. G.J.S., 2020 ONSC 7251 at paras. 46-51; R. v. Zou, 2017 ONCA 90; R. v. Mackenzie, 2015 ONCA 93 at paras. 10-11; R. v. A.V., 2020 ONCA 58 at paras. 19-20; R. v. D.K., 2020 ONCA at para. 46 By contrast, in this case, there is nothing in the trial judge’s reasons to suggest that he i......
  • R. v. D.K., 2020 ONCA 79
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 3 Febrero 2020
    ...use of the utterance: see Dinardo, at para. 36; R. v. J.A.T., 2012 ONCA 177, 290 O.A.C. 130, at paras. 97-100; and R. v. A.V., 2020 ONCA 58, at para. 20. On the other hand, the trial judge purports to engage the narrative as circumstantial evidence exception discussed in Khan. The trial jud......
  • R. v. Hayes,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 25 Agosto 2022
    ...in the bedroom and then on her bed. Although the location of the alleged sexual assault can be considered a minor detail (see R. v. A.V., 2020 ONCA 58), in this case, it is important as the location of the kissing/touching as suggested by the mother lines up with J.H.’s evidence. [18......
1 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (January 27 – January 31, 2020)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 7 Abril 2020
    ...Freedoms, s. 10(b), 24(2), R. v. G.T.D., 2018 SCC 7, R. v. Plaha (2004), 188 C.C.C. (3d) 289 (ONCA), R. v. Grant, 2009 SCC 32 R. v. A.V., 2020 ONCA 58 (Publication Ban) Keywords: Criminal Law, Sexual Interference, Sexual Exploitation, Sexual Assault, Evidence, Admissibility, Prior Consisten......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT