R v. Van Huigenbos

JurisdictionAlberta
CourtCourt of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
JudgeYamauchi
Citation2025 ABKB 14
Docket Number220874028Q1
Date10 January 2025

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 practice notes
  • R. v. Van Huigenbos
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • March 9, 2026
    ...Decision by The Honourable Justice K.D. Yamauchi Filed on the 29th day of November, 2024 and the 10th day of January, 2025 (2024 ABKB 714, 2025 ABKB 14, Docket: Memorandum of Judgment _______________________________________________________     The Court:   Introduction [1]&nb......
  • R. v. Barber
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada)
    • October 7, 2025
    ...Transmountain Pipeline, Pig Farm, logging protests, and the Coutts Blockade. [126]    In R. v. Van Huigenbos and Jansen, 2025 ABKB 14 (Yamauchi, J.), the accused were convicted of mischief by a jury for their participation in the Coutts Border Crossing Blockade which occurred......
  • R. v. King
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • February 19, 2025
    ...Border Crossing blockade’ cases, which are very recent and highly relevant, in the court’s view. In R. v. Van Huigenbos and Janzen, 2025 ABKB 14 (Yamauchi J.) the accused were convicted of mischief by a jury for their participation in the Coutts border crossing blockade. They were convicted......
3 cases
  • R. v. Van Huigenbos
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • March 9, 2026
    ...Decision by The Honourable Justice K.D. Yamauchi Filed on the 29th day of November, 2024 and the 10th day of January, 2025 (2024 ABKB 714, 2025 ABKB 14, Docket: Memorandum of Judgment _______________________________________________________     The Court:   Introduction [1]&nb......
  • R. v. Barber
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada)
    • October 7, 2025
    ...Transmountain Pipeline, Pig Farm, logging protests, and the Coutts Blockade. [126]    In R. v. Van Huigenbos and Jansen, 2025 ABKB 14 (Yamauchi, J.), the accused were convicted of mischief by a jury for their participation in the Coutts Border Crossing Blockade which occurred......
  • R. v. King
    • Canada
    • Ontario Superior Court of Justice
    • February 19, 2025
    ...Border Crossing blockade’ cases, which are very recent and highly relevant, in the court’s view. In R. v. Van Huigenbos and Janzen, 2025 ABKB 14 (Yamauchi J.) the accused were convicted of mischief by a jury for their participation in the Coutts border crossing blockade. They were convicted......