R v Vander Leeuw, 2021 ABCA 61
| Jurisdiction | Alberta |
| Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Frans Slatter,The Honourable Madam Justice Frederica Schutz,The Honourable Madam Justice Elizabeth Hughes |
| Docket Number | 1903-0273-A |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Date | 17 February 2021 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
R v PO,
...Court and provide this written Judgment to Counsel afterwards. [13] This approach was endorsed by our Court of Appeal in R v Vander Leeuw, 2021 ABCA 61 [Vander Leeuw]. In Vander Leeuw the Trial Judge (Lema, J) read brief reasons for his decision into the record and then filed full written r......
-
R v CD,
...applicant is entitled to point out any differences between the oral and written reasons and argue their significance: R. v Vander Leeuw, 2021 ABCA 61 at para. [14] The written reasons for decision contain considerable obiter discussion of the constitutionality of the mandatory minimum sente......
-
R v CD,
...finalized, but due to the length read only a summary, followed by immediate release of the longer version: e.g. R. v Vander Leeuw, 2021 ABCA 61 at para. 9. (c) The trial judge may announce his or her decision, but then correct that decis......
3 cases
-
R v PO,
...Court and provide this written Judgment to Counsel afterwards. [13] This approach was endorsed by our Court of Appeal in R v Vander Leeuw, 2021 ABCA 61 [Vander Leeuw]. In Vander Leeuw the Trial Judge (Lema, J) read brief reasons for his decision into the record and then filed full written r......
-
R v CD,
...applicant is entitled to point out any differences between the oral and written reasons and argue their significance: R. v Vander Leeuw, 2021 ABCA 61 at para. [14] The written reasons for decision contain considerable obiter discussion of the constitutionality of the mandatory minimum sente......
-
R v CD,
...finalized, but due to the length read only a summary, followed by immediate release of the longer version: e.g. R. v Vander Leeuw, 2021 ABCA 61 at para. 9. (c) The trial judge may announce his or her decision, but then correct that decis......