R. v. VanEindhoven (A.), 2006 NUCJ 12
| Judge | Kilpatrick, J. |
| Court | Nunavut Court of Justice (Canada) |
| Case Date | April 04, 2006 |
| Jurisdiction | Nunavut |
| Citations | 2006 NUCJ 12;[2006] Nunavut Cases 12 (CJ) |
R. v. VanEindhoven (A.), [2006] Nunavut Cases 12 (CJ)
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [2006] Nunavut Cases TBEd. JN.119
Her Majesty the Queen (prosecutor) v. Adrian VanEindhoven (accused)
(18-04-57-1; 2006 NUCJ 12)
Indexed As: R. v. VanEindhoven (A.)
Nunavut Court of Justice
Iqaluit
Kilpatrick, J.
June 13, 2006.
Summary:
This headnote contains no summary.
Editor's Note: Certain names in the following case have been initialized or the case otherwise edited to prevent the disclosure of identities where required by law, publication ban, Maritime Law Book's editorial policy or otherwise.
Criminal Law - Topic 5342
Evidence and witnesses - Confessions and voluntary statements - Cross-examination on - See paragraphs 102 to 156.
Criminal Law - Topic 5355
Evidence and witnesses - Confessions and voluntary statements - Whether statement was made freely and voluntarily - See paragraphs 4 to 101.
Evidence - Topic 1670
Hearsay rule - Hearsay rule exceptions and exclusions - Statements of physical sensation and mental condition - Statements by victim - See paragraphs 157 to 187.
Counsel:
Christine Gagnon and Faiyaz Alibhai, for the prosecutor;
Tom Boyd, for the accused.
This case was heard at Rankin Inlet, Nunavut, on March 27 to April 4, 2006, by Kilpatrick, J., of the Nunavut Court of Justice, who released the following judgment on June 13, 2006.
Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
R. v. Jeffrey (M.K.), [2007] Nunavut Cases (CJ) 6
...or "confessions rule" as it is sometimes called." [15] I adopt the comments of Kilpatrick J. at paragraphs 4-13 of R. v. VanEindhoven, 2006 NUCJ 12, [2006] Nu.J. No. 13, on the purpose of the confessions rule. C. Admissibility of Hearsay Evidence [16] As noted in R. v. Evans, [1993] 3 S.C.R......
-
R. v. Kayaitok (B.), 2013 NUCJ 2
...to the questions from the police. He had an operating mind. A.iv.1 Voir Dire # 1 [29] As noted by Kilpatrick J. in R v VanEindhoven, 2006 NUCJ 12, [2006] Nu J No 13 [VanEindhoven], the absence of a police caution does not determine whether an accused's statement was voluntary. The pres......
-
R. v. Partridge (J.), 2007 NUCJ 13
...came to fear this particular police officer. III. ANALYSIS A. The Issue of Continued Questioning [8] In the case of R. v. VanEindhoven, 2006 NUCJ 12, the Court discussed the significance of continued police questioning after a suspect has indicated a desire to remain silent: "[85] The repea......
-
R. v. J.A., [2008] Nunavut Cases Uned. 8 (CJ)
...expressly adopts the limitations associated with the use of context evidence as set out by this Court in the case of R. v. VanEindhoven, 2006 NUCJ 12, 70 W.C.B. ( 2d ) 982 at paragraphs 132-139. The Court also accepts that the range of evidence available as "context" is much broad......
-
R. v. Jeffrey (M.K.), [2007] Nunavut Cases (CJ) 6
...or "confessions rule" as it is sometimes called." [15] I adopt the comments of Kilpatrick J. at paragraphs 4-13 of R. v. VanEindhoven, 2006 NUCJ 12, [2006] Nu.J. No. 13, on the purpose of the confessions rule. C. Admissibility of Hearsay Evidence [16] As noted in R. v. Evans, [1993] 3 S.C.R......
-
R. v. Kayaitok (B.), 2013 NUCJ 2
...to the questions from the police. He had an operating mind. A.iv.1 Voir Dire # 1 [29] As noted by Kilpatrick J. in R v VanEindhoven, 2006 NUCJ 12, [2006] Nu J No 13 [VanEindhoven], the absence of a police caution does not determine whether an accused's statement was voluntary. The pres......
-
R. v. Partridge (J.), 2007 NUCJ 13
...came to fear this particular police officer. III. ANALYSIS A. The Issue of Continued Questioning [8] In the case of R. v. VanEindhoven, 2006 NUCJ 12, the Court discussed the significance of continued police questioning after a suspect has indicated a desire to remain silent: "[85] The repea......
-
R. v. J.A., [2008] Nunavut Cases Uned. 8 (CJ)
...expressly adopts the limitations associated with the use of context evidence as set out by this Court in the case of R. v. VanEindhoven, 2006 NUCJ 12, 70 W.C.B. ( 2d ) 982 at paragraphs 132-139. The Court also accepts that the range of evidence available as "context" is much broad......