R. v. Varennes

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Neutral Citation2025 SCC 22
Citation2025 SCC 22
Docket Number40662
Date11 July 2025

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
10 practice notes
  • R. v. Wilson
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • October 24, 2025
    ...R. v. Anderson, 2014 SCC 41, [2014] 2 S.C.R. 167; Krieger v. Law Society of Alberta, 2002 SCC 65, [2002] 3 S.C.R. 372; R. v. Varennes, 2025 SCC 22; ATCO Gas and Pipelines Ltd. v. Alberta (Energy and Utilities Board), 2006 SCC 4, [2006] 1 S.C.R. 140; R. v. Khill, 2021 SCC 37, [2021] 2 S.C.R.......
  • McCormack v. Evans
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • November 13, 2025
    ...Nixon, 2011 SCC 34, [2011] 2 S.C.R. 566, at para. 20; R. v. Anderson, 2014 SCC 41, [2014] 2 S.C.R. 167, at para. 40; and R. v. Varennes, 2025 SCC 22, 449 C.C.C. (3d) 427, at para. 48. This discretion allows for decisions to be made in the public interest, based, not only on legal principles......
  • R. v. Martinez
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • March 27, 2026
    ...intervene to prevent any abuse of process, even if doing so interferes with a decision of core prosecutorial discretion: R v Varennes, 2025 SCC 22 at paras 52-55. This may occur even in the absence of any perceived state misconduct: Varennes at para 54. Per Babos, “[r]epeatedly prosecuting ......
  • R. v. Burke
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • September 8, 2025
    ...for an abuse of process: R. v. Beare, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 387, at p. 411; Krieger, at para. 46; Anderson, at para. 40; R. v. Varennes, 2025 SCC 22, 504 D.L.R. (4th) 583, at para. 45. No abuse of process application was brought; no evidentiary foundation was offered to displace the presumption o......
  • Get Started for Free
5 cases
  • McCormack v. Evans
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • November 13, 2025
    ...Nixon, 2011 SCC 34, [2011] 2 S.C.R. 566, at para. 20; R. v. Anderson, 2014 SCC 41, [2014] 2 S.C.R. 167, at para. 40; and R. v. Varennes, 2025 SCC 22, 449 C.C.C. (3d) 427, at para. 48. This discretion allows for decisions to be made in the public interest, based, not only on legal principles......
  • R. v. Martinez
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • March 27, 2026
    ...intervene to prevent any abuse of process, even if doing so interferes with a decision of core prosecutorial discretion: R v Varennes, 2025 SCC 22 at paras 52-55. This may occur even in the absence of any perceived state misconduct: Varennes at para 54. Per Babos, “[r]epeatedly prosecuting ......
  • R. v. Burke
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • September 8, 2025
    ...for an abuse of process: R. v. Beare, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 387, at p. 411; Krieger, at para. 46; Anderson, at para. 40; R. v. Varennes, 2025 SCC 22, 504 D.L.R. (4th) 583, at para. 45. No abuse of process application was brought; no evidentiary foundation was offered to displace the presumption o......
  • R. v. Knoll
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • March 6, 2026
    ...SCR 863 at 958-59 (SCC); R v Meltzer, 1989 CanLII 68, [1989] 1 SCR 1764 at 1773 (SCC); R v Awashish, 2018 SCC 45 at para 10; R v Varennes, 2025 SCC 22 at para 32; R v T.S., 1993 CanLII 9134, 109 Sask R 96 at paras 12-15; (CA)  R v Yates, 2023 SKCA 47 at para 40; R v Verma, 2016 BCCA 30......
  • Get Started for Free