R. v. Vickers, 2020 ONCA 275
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Watt, Fairburn and Zarnett JJ.A. |
| Docket Number | C54928 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Date | 30 April 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (April 27 ' May 1)
...819, R. v. Araya, 2015 SCC 11, R. v. Omitiran, 2020 ONCA 261, R. v. Kazman, 2020 ONCA 251, R. v. Paramsothy, 2020 ONSC 2314 R. v. V., 2020 ONCA 275 Keywords: Criminal Law, First Degree Murder, Fresh Evidence, Youth Criminal Justice Act, S.C. 2002, c. 1, Palmer v. The Queen, [1981] S.C.R. 75......
-
COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (July 3- July 7, 2023)
...415, Matthew Brady Self Storage Corporation v. InStorage Limited Partnership, 2014 ONCA 858, R. v. Khelawon, 2006 SCC 57, R. v. Vickers, 2020 ONCA 275, R. v. F.(W.J.), [1999] 3 S.C.R. 569, Guest Tek Interactive Entertainment Ltd. v. Nomadix, Inc., 2020 FC 860, R. v. Belem, 2017 ONSC 2213, B......
-
R v Lachance,
...this witness, including by offering testimonial aids. She emphasized the following statement in the per curiam decision in R v Vickers, 2020 ONCA 275: The necessity requirement cannot be met simply because C.B. would not answer questions at the preliminary inquiry. He was not subpoenaed for......
-
R v Lachance,
...this witness, including by offering testimonial aids. She emphasized the following statement in the per curiam decision in R v Vickers, 2020 ONCA 275: The necessity requirement cannot be met simply because C.B. would not answer questions at the preliminary inquiry. He was not subpoenaed for......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
-
R v Lachance,
...this witness, including by offering testimonial aids. She emphasized the following statement in the per curiam decision in R v Vickers, 2020 ONCA 275: The necessity requirement cannot be met simply because C.B. would not answer questions at the preliminary inquiry. He was not subpoenaed for......
-
R v Lachance,
...this witness, including by offering testimonial aids. She emphasized the following statement in the per curiam decision in R v Vickers, 2020 ONCA 275: The necessity requirement cannot be met simply because C.B. would not answer questions at the preliminary inquiry. He was not subpoenaed for......
-
R. v. McMorris,
...208 C.C.C. (3d) 43 (Ont. C.A.), leave to appeal refused, [2006] S.C.C.A. No. 232, at para. 51, and more recently in R. v. Vickers, 2020 ONCA 275, at para. 58, threshold reliability is a substitute for the cross-examination of the declarant, not the narrator. Charron J. endorsed the Humaid a......
-
R. v. Olagbaiye,
...Of note the defence did not dispute the authenticity of the audio recordings as being between A.M. and the defendant. [27] R. v. Vickers, 2020 ONCA 275, at para. [28] See R. v. J.M. 2010 ONCA 117, at para. 54. [29] Ibid at para. 54. [30] Bradshaw at para. 24. [31] R. v. Wray, [1970] 4 CCC 1......
2 firm's commentaries
-
COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (July 3- July 7, 2023)
...415, Matthew Brady Self Storage Corporation v. InStorage Limited Partnership, 2014 ONCA 858, R. v. Khelawon, 2006 SCC 57, R. v. Vickers, 2020 ONCA 275, R. v. F.(W.J.), [1999] 3 S.C.R. 569, Guest Tek Interactive Entertainment Ltd. v. Nomadix, Inc., 2020 FC 860, R. v. Belem, 2017 ONSC 2213, B......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (April 27 ' May 1)
...819, R. v. Araya, 2015 SCC 11, R. v. Omitiran, 2020 ONCA 261, R. v. Kazman, 2020 ONCA 251, R. v. Paramsothy, 2020 ONSC 2314 R. v. V., 2020 ONCA 275 Keywords: Criminal Law, First Degree Murder, Fresh Evidence, Youth Criminal Justice Act, S.C. 2002, c. 1, Palmer v. The Queen, [1981] S.C.R. 75......