R. v. Violette (J.J.) et al., [2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 421 (SC)
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Judge | Romilly, J. |
| Citation | [2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 421 (SC),2009 BCSC 421,[2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 421 |
| Subject Matter | EVIDENCE,CIVIL RIGHTS,PRACTICE,CRIMINAL LAW |
| Date | 30 March 2009 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
R. v. Barton (B.), 2015 ABQB 159
...case. [24] There is no general exclusionary rule relating to the use of the tissue at trial. [25] A good starting point is R v Violette 2009 BCSC 421. There, the issue was the admissibility of evidence of grenade testing; a grenade had been exploded by Crown experts and was no longer availa......
-
R. v. Sonne (B.), [2012] O.T.C. Uned. 2126
...304. 24. 2005 BCPC 45, at para. 18. 25. 2009 NBPC 4. 26. R. v. K.D.S.A. , 2010 NBCA 24. 27. R.S.C. 1985, c. E-17. 28. C.R.C., c599. 29. 2009 BCSC 421. 30. R. v. Fleet , [1997] O.J. No. 5443 (Ont. C.A.) at para. 20. 31. [2009] S.C. J. No. 28. 32. [2001] 1 S.C.R. 45, at para. 56. 33. [2005] 2......
-
R. v. Haevischer, 2013 BCSC 367
...me that the photographs were not destroyed as a result of unacceptable negligence on the part of the police. [221] In R. v. Violette, 2009 BCSC 421, Romilly J. reviewed the Supreme Court of Canada authorities regarding what constitutes unacceptable negligence, including La, and offered the ......
-
R. v. Negasi (T.), [2015] A.R. TBEd. DE.143
...(R.) ( 1990 ) , 58 C.C.C. (3d) 334 at 347; R. v Kinkead , [1999] O.J. No.1498, R. v. Schaefler , 1993 CarswellOnt 3381, R. v Violette , 2009 BCSC 421; R. v. Ellard , 2005 BCSC 552; R. v. Effert , 2011ABCA 145, and R. v Arsoniadis , [2007] OJ No.1211). As one would expect, the outcomes discu......
4 cases
-
R. v. Barton (B.), 2015 ABQB 159
...case. [24] There is no general exclusionary rule relating to the use of the tissue at trial. [25] A good starting point is R v Violette 2009 BCSC 421. There, the issue was the admissibility of evidence of grenade testing; a grenade had been exploded by Crown experts and was no longer availa......
-
R. v. Sonne (B.), [2012] O.T.C. Uned. 2126
...304. 24. 2005 BCPC 45, at para. 18. 25. 2009 NBPC 4. 26. R. v. K.D.S.A. , 2010 NBCA 24. 27. R.S.C. 1985, c. E-17. 28. C.R.C., c599. 29. 2009 BCSC 421. 30. R. v. Fleet , [1997] O.J. No. 5443 (Ont. C.A.) at para. 20. 31. [2009] S.C. J. No. 28. 32. [2001] 1 S.C.R. 45, at para. 56. 33. [2005] 2......
-
R. v. Haevischer, 2013 BCSC 367
...me that the photographs were not destroyed as a result of unacceptable negligence on the part of the police. [221] In R. v. Violette, 2009 BCSC 421, Romilly J. reviewed the Supreme Court of Canada authorities regarding what constitutes unacceptable negligence, including La, and offered the ......
-
R. v. Negasi (T.), [2015] A.R. TBEd. DE.143
...(R.) ( 1990 ) , 58 C.C.C. (3d) 334 at 347; R. v Kinkead , [1999] O.J. No.1498, R. v. Schaefler , 1993 CarswellOnt 3381, R. v Violette , 2009 BCSC 421; R. v. Ellard , 2005 BCSC 552; R. v. Effert , 2011ABCA 145, and R. v Arsoniadis , [2007] OJ No.1211). As one would expect, the outcomes discu......