R. v. W.H., [2013] N.R. TBEd. AP.014
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | McLachlin, C.J.C., LeBel, Fish, Rothstein, Cromwell, Moldaver and Karakatsanis, JJ. |
| Subject Matter | CIVIL RIGHTS,CRIMINAL LAW |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Date | 19 April 2013 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
234 practice notes
-
R. v. Calnen, 2019 SCC 6
...2009 SCC 4, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 104; R. v. Daley, 2007 SCC 53, [2007] 3 S.C.R. 523; R. v. Mack, 2014 SCC 58, [2014] 3 S.C.R. 3; R. v. W.H., 2013 SCC 22, [2013] 2 S.C.R. 180; R. v. Yebes, [1987] 2 S.C.R. 168; R. v. Biniaris, 2000 SCC 15, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 381; R. v. Lifchus, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 320; H......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (May 25 ' 29, 2020)
...W.(R.), [1992] 2 S.C.R. 122, Kienapple v. The Queen, [1975] 1 S.C.R. 729, R. v. Howe (2005), 192 C.C.C. (3d) 480 (Ont. C.A.), R. v. W.H., 2013 SCC 22, R. v. Burke, [1996] 1 S.C.R. 474, R. v. R.P., 2012 SCC 22, R. v. Tillekaratna (1998), 124 C.C.C. (3d) 549 (Ont. C.A.), R. v. Pittiman, 2006 ......
-
Mental Disorder 2023 Criminal Code of Canada Annotations (Part XX.1)
...respects, the psychiatrist’s evidence was qualified and, without an account of the events from the accused, speculative.56 R. v. H.(W.), 2013 SCC 22 — The Supreme Court of Canada explains in this case and Molodowic that judicial experience demonstrates there is a real danger that psychiatr......
-
Appeals
..., [1987] 2 SCR 168 at para 16 [ Yebes ], reaffirmed in Biniaris , above note 18, and R v Beaudry , 2007 SCC 5 [ Beaudry ]. 32 R v WH , 2013 SCC 22. 33 Biniaris , above note 18 at para 36. See also Yebes , above note 31 at para 25: “While the Court of Appeal must not merely substitute its vi......
Request a trial to view additional results
220 cases
-
R. v. Calnen, 2019 SCC 6
...2009 SCC 4, [2009] 1 S.C.R. 104; R. v. Daley, 2007 SCC 53, [2007] 3 S.C.R. 523; R. v. Mack, 2014 SCC 58, [2014] 3 S.C.R. 3; R. v. W.H., 2013 SCC 22, [2013] 2 S.C.R. 180; R. v. Yebes, [1987] 2 S.C.R. 168; R. v. Biniaris, 2000 SCC 15, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 381; R. v. Lifchus, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 320; H......
-
R. v. Fatunmbi (O.O.), (2014) 306 Man.R.(2d) 158 (CA)
...(C.A.), refd to. [para. 72]. R. v. G.W.R. (2011), 268 Man.R.(2d) 204; 520 W.A.C. 204; 2011 MBCA 62, refd to. [para. 72]. R. v. W.H., [2013] 2 S.C.R. 180; 442 N.R. 200; 335 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 1; 1040 A.P.R. 1; 297 C.C.C.(3d) 4; 2013 SCC 22, refd to. [para. R. v. McDonnell (T.E.), [1997] 1 ......
-
R. v. A.A., 2015 ONCA 558
...5, refd to. [para. 139]. R. v. A.G., [2000] 1 S.C.R. 439; 252 N.R. 272; 132 O.A.C. 1; 2000 SCC 17, refd to. [para. 142]. R. v. W.H., [2013] 2 S.C.R. 180; 442 N.R. 200; 335 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 1; 1040 A.P.R. 1; 2013 SCC 22, refd to. [para. R. v. R.W., [1992] 2 S.C.R. 122; 137 N.R. 214; 54 O......
-
R v Sandoval-Barillas, 2017 ABCA 154
...judicial fact-finding applied to the evidence precludes the conclusion reached by the jury” (emphasis of “any” is in original): R v H(W), 2013 SCC 22 at paras 2, 26 to 28, [2013] 2 SCR 180.[37] Circumstantial evidence can narrow down the alternatives sufficiently to support even otherwise u......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (May 25 ' 29, 2020)
...W.(R.), [1992] 2 S.C.R. 122, Kienapple v. The Queen, [1975] 1 S.C.R. 729, R. v. Howe (2005), 192 C.C.C. (3d) 480 (Ont. C.A.), R. v. W.H., 2013 SCC 22, R. v. Burke, [1996] 1 S.C.R. 474, R. v. R.P., 2012 SCC 22, R. v. Tillekaratna (1998), 124 C.C.C. (3d) 549 (Ont. C.A.), R. v. Pittiman, 2006 ......
-
Blaney's Appeals: Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (January 1 4, 2019)
...[1982] 1 SCR 811, R v Baltovich (2004), 73 OR (3d) 481 (CA), R v Yebes, [1987] 2 SCR 168, R v Biniaris, [2000] 1 SCR 381, R v W.H, 2013 SCC 22, R v Robinson, 2017 ONCA 645, R v Villaroman, 2016 SCC 33, Criminal Code, RSC 1985, c C-46, s The content of this article is intended to provide a g......
11 books & journal articles
-
Mental Disorder 2023 Criminal Code of Canada Annotations (Part XX.1)
...respects, the psychiatrist’s evidence was qualified and, without an account of the events from the accused, speculative.56 R. v. H.(W.), 2013 SCC 22 — The Supreme Court of Canada explains in this case and Molodowic that judicial experience demonstrates there is a real danger that psychiatr......
-
Appeals
..., [1987] 2 SCR 168 at para 16 [ Yebes ], reaffirmed in Biniaris , above note 18, and R v Beaudry , 2007 SCC 5 [ Beaudry ]. 32 R v WH , 2013 SCC 22. 33 Biniaris , above note 18 at para 36. See also Yebes , above note 31 at para 25: “While the Court of Appeal must not merely substitute its vi......
-
Digest: R v Nahnybida, 2018 SKCA 72
...341 CCC (3d) 21 R v Suter, 2018 SCC 34, 70 Alta LR (6th) 1 R v Usher, 2011 BCCA 271 R v Van Essen, 2010 SKPC 134, 360 Sask R 90 R v W.H., 2013 SCC 22, [2013] 2 SCR 180, 359 DLR (4th) 442, 442 NR 200, 335 Nfld & PEIR 1, 297 CCC (3d) 4 R v Wang, 2010 ONCA 435, 256 CCC (3d) 225 R v White, ......
-
Table of cases
...Judge), [1983] 2 SCR 284, 7 CCC (3d) 507, [1983] SCJ No 74 .................................................................31 R v WH, 2013 SCC 22 ......................................................................................... 569 R v Whipple, 2016 ABCA 232, 39 Alta LR (6th) 1, [2......
Request a trial to view additional results