R v Watson, 2018 ABQB 832

JudgeHonourable Mr. Justice S.N. Mandziuk
Citation2018 ABQB 832
Date02 October 2018
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Docket Number170003552S1
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 practice notes
  • R. v. BASQUE,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (New Brunswick)
    • 10 November 2021
    ...In 2018, judges of the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta took different views on the issue. In R. v. Watson, 2018 ABQB 832, [2018] A.J. No. 1168 (QL), the judge concluded credit could be given against the minimum period, while in R. v. Sohal, 2018 ABQB 845, [2018] A.J. No. 1194 (QL),......
  • R. v. Froese, 2020 MBQB 11
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • 20 January 2020
    ...The appellant urged the court to accept the reasoning in a conflicting Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench decision of R. v. Watson, 2018 ABQB 832, 78 Alta. L.R. (6th) 199 (“Watson”), which was then on appeal to the Alberta Court of Appeal. In the Watson decision, the court had found that the ad......
  • R v Watson, 2018 ABCA 404
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 3 December 2018
    ...be used to supplant the clear wording of the Criminal Code in cases involving s. 259(1) driving prohibitions”) & The Queen v. Watson, 2018 ABQB 832, ¶ 36 (“In my view, the driving suspension created by s. 88.1 of the Traffic Safety Act is for all intents and purposes tantamount to the r......
  • Wednesday: What’s Hot on CanLII
    • Canada
    • Slaw Canada’s Online Legal Magazine
    • 10 October 2018
    ...and we give you a small sense of what the cases are about. For this last week: 1. R v Watson, 2018 ABQB 832 [37] Further, in my view, the automatic one year suspension to which Mr. Watson has been subject should be subtracted from the mandatory minimum prohibition that would otherwise be im......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
  • R. v. BASQUE,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (New Brunswick)
    • 10 November 2021
    ...In 2018, judges of the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta took different views on the issue. In R. v. Watson, 2018 ABQB 832, [2018] A.J. No. 1168 (QL), the judge concluded credit could be given against the minimum period, while in R. v. Sohal, 2018 ABQB 845, [2018] A.J. No. 1194 (QL),......
  • R. v. Froese, 2020 MBQB 11
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • 20 January 2020
    ...The appellant urged the court to accept the reasoning in a conflicting Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench decision of R. v. Watson, 2018 ABQB 832, 78 Alta. L.R. (6th) 199 (“Watson”), which was then on appeal to the Alberta Court of Appeal. In the Watson decision, the court had found that the ad......
  • R v Watson, 2018 ABCA 404
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 3 December 2018
    ...be used to supplant the clear wording of the Criminal Code in cases involving s. 259(1) driving prohibitions”) & The Queen v. Watson, 2018 ABQB 832, ¶ 36 (“In my view, the driving suspension created by s. 88.1 of the Traffic Safety Act is for all intents and purposes tantamount to the r......
  • R v Sohal, 2018 ABQB 845
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 9 October 2018
    ...be taken into account and in fact subtracted from the mandatory minimum prescribed under the Criminal Code. [6] Last week in R v Watson, 2018 ABQB 832, my colleague Mandziuk J. upheld the trial judge decision who gave credit for an administrative suspension under s. 88.1 of the TSA, as it r......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT