R v Weldekidan, 2019 MBCA 109
Jurisdiction | Manitoba |
Judge | Madam Justice Barbara M. Hamilton,Madam Justice Jennifer A. Pfuetzner,Madam Justice Karen I. Simonsen |
Citation | 2019 MBCA 109 |
Date | 24 October 2019 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Manitoba) |
Docket Number | AR18-30-09080 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
Hearsay
...presence or absence of 118 Khelawon , above note 4 at para 92. 119 Couture , above note 55 at para 92. 120 See, e.g., R v Weldekidan , 2019 MBCA 109 [ Weldekidan ]. 121 Bradshaw , above note 90 at para 29. 122 Starr , above note 7. THE LAW OF EVIDENCE 172 adequate substitutes for testing th......
-
Table of cases
...R v Watkins (2003), 181 CCC (3d) 78 (Ont CA) .................................................88 R v Weldekidan, 2019 MBCA 109 ...............................................................171, 172 R v Wells, [1998] 2 SCR 517 ......................................................................
-
Dobrowolski v Dobrowolski,
...is a question of mixed fact and law to be reviewed on a standard of palpable and overriding error. See, for example, R v Weldekidan, 2019 MBCA 109 (at paras It is well established that the admissibility of evidence, including hearsay evidence, raises a question of law: see, for example, Fan......
-
R. v. Sivakumar,
...determining the comparative reliability of his trial testimony and the out-of-court statement: see Devine, at para. 28; R. v. Weldekidan, 2019 MBCA 109, 381 C.C.C. (3d) 540, at para. 60. Having seen Mr. Mathuvan’s evidence so far, I will say that the jury will undoubtedly find this t......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 cases
-
Dobrowolski v Dobrowolski,
...is a question of mixed fact and law to be reviewed on a standard of palpable and overriding error. See, for example, R v Weldekidan, 2019 MBCA 109 (at paras It is well established that the admissibility of evidence, including hearsay evidence, raises a question of law: see, for example, Fan......
-
R. v. Sivakumar,
...determining the comparative reliability of his trial testimony and the out-of-court statement: see Devine, at para. 28; R. v. Weldekidan, 2019 MBCA 109, 381 C.C.C. (3d) 540, at para. 60. Having seen Mr. Mathuvan’s evidence so far, I will say that the jury will undoubtedly find this t......
-
R. v. Weldekidan,
...(CanLII); · R. v. Hall, 2018 MBCA 122 (CanLII); · R. v. Weldekidan, 2019 MBCA 109 [34] Bradshaw has established that there are three ways to consider the threshold admissibility of a statemen......
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...R v Watkins (2003), 181 CCC (3d) 78 (Ont CA) .................................................88 R v Weldekidan, 2019 MBCA 109 ...............................................................171, 172 R v Wells, [1998] 2 SCR 517 ......................................................................
-
Hearsay
...presence or absence of 118 Khelawon , above note 4 at para 92. 119 Couture , above note 55 at para 92. 120 See, e.g., R v Weldekidan , 2019 MBCA 109 [ Weldekidan ]. 121 Bradshaw , above note 90 at para 29. 122 Starr , above note 7. THE LAW OF EVIDENCE 172 adequate substitutes for testing th......