R. v. White
| Jurisdiction | Nova Scotia |
| Court | Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada) |
| Judge | Beaton,Bourgeois,Bryson |
| Citation | 2022 NSCA 61 |
| Date | 19 October 2022 |
| Docket Number | CAC 505029 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
6 practice notes
-
R. v. Zacharias
...2010 BCCA 72, 251 C.C.C. (3d) 492; R. v. Kossick, 2017 SKPC 67, 392 C.R.R. (2d) 250, aff’d 2018 SKCA 55, 365 C.C.C. (3d) 186; R. v. White, 2022 NSCA 61, 419 C.C.C. (3d) 123; R. v. Loewen, 2018 SKCA 69, [2018] 12 W.W.R. 280; R. v. Reilly, 2021 SCC 38; R. v. Au‑Yeung, 2010 ONSC 2292, 209 C.R.......
-
R. v. Carvery
...of which are highly regulated - see paras. 59-66 in R. v. Singh, 2024 ONCA 66 albeit in distinguishable circumstances; and R. v. White, 2022 NSCA 61 at paras. 35-38 per Bryson iii - Even if there was a breach of Mr. Carvery’s s. 8 Charter rights, the evidence should not be excluded pursuant......
-
R. v. White
...and appropriate. [133] Notably, in the decision to overturn the trial judge’s conclusion to exclude evidence herein, 2022 NSCA 61, Justice Bryson had this to say: Conclusion [87] This is a serious case, involving guns and drugs. There were two count......
-
R. v. Lambert and Bailey
...[87] Voir Dire Decision, at para. 354. [88] Voir Dire Decision. [89] Voir Dire Decision. [90] Voir Dire Decision. [91] 2020 ONCA 246. [92] 2022 NSCA 61. [93] Adler, supra, at para. 39. [94] Voir Dire Decision, at para. 282. [95] 2017 BCCA 99; 2010 BCCA 72; 2019 BCCA 116; 2011 BCCA 280; and ......
Get Started for Free
6 cases
-
R. v. Zacharias
...2010 BCCA 72, 251 C.C.C. (3d) 492; R. v. Kossick, 2017 SKPC 67, 392 C.R.R. (2d) 250, aff’d 2018 SKCA 55, 365 C.C.C. (3d) 186; R. v. White, 2022 NSCA 61, 419 C.C.C. (3d) 123; R. v. Loewen, 2018 SKCA 69, [2018] 12 W.W.R. 280; R. v. Reilly, 2021 SCC 38; R. v. Au‑Yeung, 2010 ONSC 2292, 209 C.R.......
-
R. v. Carvery
...of which are highly regulated - see paras. 59-66 in R. v. Singh, 2024 ONCA 66 albeit in distinguishable circumstances; and R. v. White, 2022 NSCA 61 at paras. 35-38 per Bryson iii - Even if there was a breach of Mr. Carvery’s s. 8 Charter rights, the evidence should not be excluded pursuant......
-
R. v. White
...and appropriate. [133] Notably, in the decision to overturn the trial judge’s conclusion to exclude evidence herein, 2022 NSCA 61, Justice Bryson had this to say: Conclusion [87] This is a serious case, involving guns and drugs. There were two count......
-
R. v. Lambert and Bailey
...[87] Voir Dire Decision, at para. 354. [88] Voir Dire Decision. [89] Voir Dire Decision. [90] Voir Dire Decision. [91] 2020 ONCA 246. [92] 2022 NSCA 61. [93] Adler, supra, at para. 39. [94] Voir Dire Decision, at para. 282. [95] 2017 BCCA 99; 2010 BCCA 72; 2019 BCCA 116; 2011 BCCA 280; and ......
Get Started for Free
