R. v. Wilson, 2025 SCC 32
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | Wagner, Richard; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Côté, Suzanne; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah; Kasirer, Nicholas; Jamal, Mahmud; O’Bonsawin, Michelle; Moreau, Mary |
| Docket Number | 40990 |
| Date | 24 October 2025 |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2025 SCC 32 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 practice notes
-
R v Wilson,
...Canadian Drug Policy Coalition, Association des intervenants en dépendance du Québec and Harm Reduction Nurses Association Interveners 2025 SCC 32 Present: Wagner C.J. and Karakatsanis, Côté, Rowe, Martin, Kasirer, Jamal, O'Bonsawin and Moreau JJ. DOCKET: 40990 SUPREME COURT OF CANADA Const......
-
Louis Dreyfus Company Canada ULC v. Canada National Railway Company,
...to take into account the legislative provisions would be to overlook the purpose and context of the Act (Rizzo at para 21, R v Wilson, 2025 SCC 32, at para 129). The Act is primordial in the Court’s exercise of its duties under section 116(5) in the context of this [282] Fifth, Mr. Das hims......
-
The Canadian Transit Company v Canada (Attorney General),
...Canada Factum, para. 3. 26 Kosicki v. Toronto (City), 2025 SCC 28, 507 D.L.R. (4th) 1, at para. 28. 27 Piekut, at para. 44;, R. v. Wilson, 2025 SCC 32, at para. 132, per Jamal J. (dissenting); Bell ExpressVu Limited Partnership v. Rex, 2002 SCC 42, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 559, at para. 27; Pepa, at......
4 cases
-
R v Wilson
...Canadian Drug Policy Coalition, Association des intervenants en dépendance du Québec and Harm Reduction Nurses Association Interveners 2025 SCC 32 Present: Wagner C.J. and Karakatsanis, Côté, Rowe, Martin, Kasirer, Jamal, O'Bonsawin and Moreau JJ. DOCKET: 40990 SUPREME COURT OF CANADA Const......
-
Louis Dreyfus Company Canada ULC v. Canada National Railway Company
...to take into account the legislative provisions would be to overlook the purpose and context of the Act (Rizzo at para 21, R v Wilson, 2025 SCC 32, at para 129). The Act is primordial in the Court’s exercise of its duties under section 116(5) in the context of this [282] Fifth, Mr. Das hims......
-
The Canadian Transit Company v Canada (Attorney General)
...Canada Factum, para. 3. 26 Kosicki v. Toronto (City), 2025 SCC 28, 507 D.L.R. (4th) 1, at para. 28. 27 Piekut, at para. 44;, R. v. Wilson, 2025 SCC 32, at para. 132, per Jamal J. (dissenting); Bell ExpressVu Limited Partnership v. Rex, 2002 SCC 42, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 559, at para. 27; Pepa, at......
-
R v Aiman Khiar
...expeditiously. 19 This section protects the underrepresented and self-represented. 20 Counsel referred to the recent case of R. v. Wilson, 2025 SCC 32, 507 D.L.R. (4th) 573, where the Supreme Court of Canada dealt with the statutory interpretation of the immunity provisions under s. 4.1(2) ......