R. v. Wilson
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Judge | Richard Wagner; Andromache Karakatsanis; Suzanne Côté; Malcolm Rowe; Sheilah Martin; Nicholas Kasirer; Mahmud Jamal; Michelle O’Bonsawin; Mary Moreau |
| Citation | 2025 SCC 32 |
| Docket Number | 40990 |
| Date | 24 October 2025 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
21 practice notes
-
R. v. Froehlich
...its grammatical and ordinary sense harmoniously with the scheme of the Act, its purpose, and the intention of Parliament (see R v Wilson, 2025 SCC 32 at para 32; Winters v Legal Services Society, 1999 CanLII 656 at para 47, [1999] 3 SCR 160 (SCC); and R v Carignan, 2025 SCC 43 at para 55). ......
-
R. v. Nguyen
...Municipalities, 2025 SCC 15; Piekut v. Canada (National Revenue), 2025 SCC 13; R. v. Alex, 2017 SCC 37, [2017] 1 S.C.R. 967; R. v. Wilson, 2025 SCC 32; Montréal (City) v. 2952-1366 Québec Inc., 2005 SCC 62, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 141; R. v. Rafilovich, 2019 SCC 51, [2019] 3 S.C.R. 838; Sun Indalex......
-
R. v. Singer
...32, [2007] 2 S.C.R. 725; R. v. Kang-Brown, 2008 SCC 18, [2008] 1 S.C.R. 456; R. v. Mann, 2004 SCC 52, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 59; R. v. Wilson, 2025 SCC 32; R. v. Tessling, 2004 SCC 67, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 432; R. v. Gomboc, 2010 SCC 55, [2010] 3 S.C.R. 211; R. v. Beaver, 2022 SCC 54, [2022] 3 S.C.R. 7......
-
Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v. Pavic
...structure of the statute: Pepa v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 SCC 21, at paras 107-114; Piekut, at para 44; R. v. Wilson, 2025 SCC 32, at para 131 (Jamal J., dissenting). Contextual factors outside the statute may also be considered: see Ontario (Attorney General) v Ontario (I......
Get Started for Free
21 cases
-
R. v. Froehlich
...its grammatical and ordinary sense harmoniously with the scheme of the Act, its purpose, and the intention of Parliament (see R v Wilson, 2025 SCC 32 at para 32; Winters v Legal Services Society, 1999 CanLII 656 at para 47, [1999] 3 SCR 160 (SCC); and R v Carignan, 2025 SCC 43 at para 55). ......
-
R. v. Nguyen
...Municipalities, 2025 SCC 15; Piekut v. Canada (National Revenue), 2025 SCC 13; R. v. Alex, 2017 SCC 37, [2017] 1 S.C.R. 967; R. v. Wilson, 2025 SCC 32; Montréal (City) v. 2952-1366 Québec Inc., 2005 SCC 62, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 141; R. v. Rafilovich, 2019 SCC 51, [2019] 3 S.C.R. 838; Sun Indalex......
-
R. v. Singer
...32, [2007] 2 S.C.R. 725; R. v. Kang-Brown, 2008 SCC 18, [2008] 1 S.C.R. 456; R. v. Mann, 2004 SCC 52, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 59; R. v. Wilson, 2025 SCC 32; R. v. Tessling, 2004 SCC 67, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 432; R. v. Gomboc, 2010 SCC 55, [2010] 3 S.C.R. 211; R. v. Beaver, 2022 SCC 54, [2022] 3 S.C.R. 7......
-
Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v. Pavic
...structure of the statute: Pepa v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 SCC 21, at paras 107-114; Piekut, at para 44; R. v. Wilson, 2025 SCC 32, at para 131 (Jamal J., dissenting). Contextual factors outside the statute may also be considered: see Ontario (Attorney General) v Ontario (I......
Get Started for Free
