R. v. Wilson

JurisdictionOntario
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
JudgeBenotto, Brown and Paciocco JJ.A.
Citation2020 ONCA 3
Docket NumberC64711
Date06 January 2020

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
17 practice notes
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 16 – March 20, 2020)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • April 1, 2020
    ...Coke Principle, Youth Criminal Justice Act, S.C. 2002, s. 72(1), R. v. Adan, 2019 ONCA 709, R. v. M.W., 2017 ONCA 22, R. v. Wilson, 2020 ONCA 3, R. v. Kinnear (2005), 199 O.A.C. 323 (ONCA) Romania v. Boros, 2020 ONCA 216 Keywords: Criminal Law, Extradition, Extradition Act, s. 15, 29(1)(a),......
  • R v Mavros
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • April 29, 2022
    ...principle is inapplicable to dangerous offender and long-term offender hearings: R v Hexamer, 2019 BCCA 285, paras 171, 174; R v Wilson, 2020 ONCA 3, para 64, 384 CCC (3d) 355. Subsequent convictions “are of utmost relevance in dangerous offender sentencing in establishing patterns o......
  • R. v. Wiseman
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador (Canada)
    • November 10, 2022
    ...Appearing on behalf of the Accused   Authorities Cited:   CASES CONSIDERED:  R. v. Oland, 2015 NBQB 242; R. v. Wilson, 2020 ONCA 3; R. v. Fries, 2017 MBCA 58; R. v. Barker, 2021 NSPC 59; R. v. Rhab, 1985 CarswellOnt 1619, 21 C.C.C. (3d) 97 (Ont. H.C.J.); R. v. Klassen, [1976]......
  • R. v. Jama et al.
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • July 8, 2021
    ...principle” suggests that he should be treated as a first offender.  That principle was explained in R. v. Wilson, 2020 ONCA 3, 384 C.C.C. (3d) 355, at para. 61: “Lord Coke's principle” makes sense. A repeat offender who has already been sentenced for offending......
  • Get Started for Free
22 cases
  • R. v. Archambault
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • November 1, 2024
    ...trigger the dangerous offender proceeding, its determination goes well beyond the originating offence: R. v. Wilson, [2020] O.J. No. 30, 2020 ONCA 3, 384 C.C.C. (3d) 355, at para. As s. 535 makes clear, it is the seriousness of the offence that dictates the entitlement to a preliminary inqu......
  • R. v. Wisdom
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • July 18, 2024
    ...principle” holds that “subsequent convictions cannot be relied upon to aggravate the sentence imposed for a prior offence”: R. v. Wilson, 2020 ONCA 3, 384 C.C.C. (3d) 355, at para. 60; see also R. v. Skolnick, [1982] 2 S.C.R. 47. Put otherwise, even if offence #1 occurred before the offence......
  • R v Mavros
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • April 29, 2022
    ...principle is inapplicable to dangerous offender and long-term offender hearings: R v Hexamer, 2019 BCCA 285, paras 171, 174; R v Wilson, 2020 ONCA 3, para 64, 384 CCC (3d) 355. Subsequent convictions “are of utmost relevance in dangerous offender sentencing in establishing patterns o......
  • R. v. Jama et al.
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • July 8, 2021
    ...known as “Lord Coke’s principle” suggests that he should be treated as a first offender. That principle was explained in R. v. Wilson, 2020 ONCA 3, 384 C.C.C. (3d) 355, at para. 61: “Lord Coke's principle” makes sense. A repeat offender who has already been sentenced for offending may requi......
  • Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 16 – March 20, 2020)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • April 1, 2020
    ...Coke Principle, Youth Criminal Justice Act, S.C. 2002, s. 72(1), R. v. Adan, 2019 ONCA 709, R. v. M.W., 2017 ONCA 22, R. v. Wilson, 2020 ONCA 3, R. v. Kinnear (2005), 199 O.A.C. 323 (ONCA) Romania v. Boros, 2020 ONCA 216 Keywords: Criminal Law, Extradition, Extradition Act, s. 15, 29(1)(a),......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (January 6 – January 10, 2020)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • January 14, 2020
    ...Keywords: Criminal Law, Child Pornography, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, s 7, 10(b), and 24(2), R v Grant, 2009 SCC 32 R v W, 2020 ONCA 3 (Publication Ban) Keywords: Criminal Law, Sexual Assault, Kidnapping, Uttering Death Threats, Lord Coke's Principle R v M, 2020 ONCA 6 Keyword......