R v Wolff,
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | Whitmore, Leurer and Kalmakoff JJ.A. |
| Citation | 2019 SKCA 103 |
| Docket Number | CACR3176 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Date | 16 October 2019 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
55 practice notes
-
R v Stevenson,
...criminal lifestyle, past dishonesty, or interest in the outcome of the trial, cannot be trusted to tell the truth” ( R v Wolff, 2019 SKCA 103 at para 57, 380 CCC (3d) 223 [ Wolff], citing Khela at para 32 In a judge-alone trial this means when the Crown's case relies on the testimony of a w......
-
R v Olynik,
...of the accused is the only reasonable inference that may be drawn must be made on an examination of the evidence as a whole ( R v Wolff, 2019 SKCA 103 at para 76, 380 CCC (3d) 223). Read in their entirety and in context, the trial judge's reasons amply demonstrate that he recognized that he......
-
R v Whitehawk,
...to “carefully examine [that] evidence for confirmation before relying on it” ( Stevenson at para 32; see also Omer at para 22; R v Wolff, 2019 SKCA 103 at para 61, 380 CCC (3d) 144 The mere mention of evidence that is capable of being confirmatory – or the identification of a bare appearanc......
-
R v Kishayinew,
...is a finding of fact that attracts significant deference by a reviewing court: Patrick at para 57, Schaff at para 44, and R v Wolff, 2019 SKCA 103 at para 40 [Wolff]. [58] When a verdict is challenged on the basis of unreasonableness, an appellate court may, to a limited extent, examine, co......
Get Started for Free
55 cases
-
R v Stevenson,
...criminal lifestyle, past dishonesty, or interest in the outcome of the trial, cannot be trusted to tell the truth” ( R v Wolff, 2019 SKCA 103 at para 57, 380 CCC (3d) 223 [ Wolff], citing Khela at para 32 In a judge-alone trial this means when the Crown's case relies on the testimony of a w......
-
R v Olynik,
...of the accused is the only reasonable inference that may be drawn must be made on an examination of the evidence as a whole ( R v Wolff, 2019 SKCA 103 at para 76, 380 CCC (3d) 223). Read in their entirety and in context, the trial judge's reasons amply demonstrate that he recognized that he......
-
R v Whitehawk,
...to “carefully examine [that] evidence for confirmation before relying on it” ( Stevenson at para 32; see also Omer at para 22; R v Wolff, 2019 SKCA 103 at para 61, 380 CCC (3d) 144 The mere mention of evidence that is capable of being confirmatory – or the identification of a bare appearanc......
-
R v Kishayinew,
...is a finding of fact that attracts significant deference by a reviewing court: Patrick at para 57, Schaff at para 44, and R v Wolff, 2019 SKCA 103 at para 40 [Wolff]. [58] When a verdict is challenged on the basis of unreasonableness, an appellate court may, to a limited extent, examine, co......
Get Started for Free