R. v. Wookey (A.)

JurisdictionOntario
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
JudgeGillese, Watt and Tulloch, JJ.A.
Citation(2016), 351 O.A.C. 14 (CA),2016 ONCA 611
Date04 February 2016

R. v. Wookey (A.) (2016), 351 O.A.C. 14 (CA)

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2016] O.A.C. TBEd. AU.004

Her Majesty the Queen (respondent) v. Adam Wookey (appellant)

(C58019; 2016 ONCA 611)

Indexed As: R. v. Wookey (A.)

Ontario Court of Appeal

Gillese, Watt and Tulloch, JJ.A.

August 5, 2016.

Summary:

The accused was convicted of offences under the Food and Drugs Act (FDA) relating to 1-Benzyl-Piperazine (BZP), a substance similar to an amphetamine. The accused appealed. At issue was whether the general definition of "drug" under the FDA applied to substances that were intended for recreational use, as opposed to medicinal or therapeutic uses.

The Ontario Court of Appeal held that BZP fell under the general definition of "drug" in the FDA. The court also concluded that this was not an appropriate case for this court to exercise its discretion to hear a constitutional challenge not raised at trial. Further, the court concluded that the accused's conviction for advertising BZP as a preventative for addiction was supported by the evidence and not based on an unreasonable verdict. Accordingly, the appeal was dismissed.

Civil Rights - Topic 8584

Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms - Practice - Time for raising Charter issues - See paragraphs 53 to 62.

Food and Drug Control - Topic 1002

Drugs - General - What constitute - See paragraphs 10 to 52.

Food and Drug Control - Topic 1268

Drugs - Offences - Selling food or drug advertised to general public as treatment - See paragraphs 63 to 69.

Practice - Topic 9012

Appeals - Restrictions on argument on appeal - Issues or points not previously raised - See paragraphs 53 to 62.

Counsel:

Joseph S. Wilkinson, for the appellant;

Kevin Wilson, for the respondent.

This appeal was heard on February 4, 2016, before Gillese, Watt and Tulloch, JJ.A., of the Ontario Court of Appeal. The following decision was delivered for the court by Tulloch, J.A., on August 5, 2016.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
14 practice notes
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (February 17 ' 21)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • February 26, 2025
    ...Pleadings, Class Proceedings Act, 1992, S.O. 1992, c. 6, s. 5(1), Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 24, s. 449, R. v. Wookey, 2016 ONCA 611, Ruth Sullivan, Sullivan on the Construction of Statutes, 6th ed. (Markham, Ont.: LexisNexis Canada 2014) Furney v. Downie, 2025 ONCA 132 Keywords: To......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Regulation of Drugs in Canada. The Food and Drugs act and Related Intellectual Property Regimes - 2024 Part II
    • December 22, 2023
    ...118 R v Wetmore, [1983] 2 SCR 284 ................................................................ 3–4, 10 R v Wookey, 2016 ONCA 611 ..............................................................................5 Reference re Assisted Human Reproduction Act, 2010 SCC 61, [2010] 3 SCR 457 ........
  • R. v. Downes
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • March 10, 2023
    ...3; Bell ExpressVu Limited Partnership v. Rex, 2002 SCC 42, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 559; MacKay v. Manitoba, [1989] 2 S.C.R. 357; R. v. Wookey, 2016 ONCA 611, 363 C.R.R. (2d) 177. Statutes and Regulations Cited Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms , ss. 1 , 7 . Criminal Code , R.S.C. 1985, c. C‑4......
  • R. v. Walsh
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • January 22, 2021
    ...2002 SCC 42, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 559, at para. 26. [60] The starting point is to determine the ordinary meaning of the text: R. v. Wookey, 2016 ONCA 611, 531 O.A.C. 13, at para. 24. At para. 25 of Wookey, quoting from Ruth Sullivan, Sullivan on the Construction of Statutes, 6th ed. (Markham, On......
  • Get Started for Free
8 cases
  • R. v. Downes
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • March 10, 2023
    ...3; Bell ExpressVu Limited Partnership v. Rex, 2002 SCC 42, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 559; MacKay v. Manitoba, [1989] 2 S.C.R. 357; R. v. Wookey, 2016 ONCA 611, 363 C.R.R. (2d) 177. Statutes and Regulations Cited Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms , ss. 1 , 7 . Criminal Code&#......
  • R. v. Baltzer
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • August 8, 2018
    ...169. See also R. v. Rutledge, 2017 ONCA 635, 387 C.R.R. (2d) 78, at para. 15; R. v. Zvolensky, 2017 ONCA 475, at para. 4; R. v. Wookey, 2016 ONCA 611, 363 C.R.R. (2d) 177, at paras. 56-57; R. v. Reid, 2016 ONCA 524, 132 O.R. (3d) 26, 338 C.C.C. (3d) 47, at para. 39; and Guindon v. R., 2015 ......
  • Reflection Productions v. Ontario Media Dev. Corp.
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • January 12, 2022
    ...43, 2002 SCC 42, at para. 26. The starting point is to determine the ordinary meaning of the text: R. v. Wookey, [2016] O.J. No. 4158, 2016 ONCA 611, 351 O.A.C. 14, at para. 24. At para. 25 of Wookey, quoting from Ruth Sullivan, Sullivan on the Construction of Statutes, 6th ed. (Markham, On......
  • R. v. Walsh
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • January 22, 2021
    ...2002 SCC 42, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 559, at para. 26. [60] The starting point is to determine the ordinary meaning of the text: R. v. Wookey, 2016 ONCA 611, 531 O.A.C. 13, at para. 24. At para. 25 of Wookey, quoting from Ruth Sullivan, Sullivan on the Construction of Statutes, 6th ed. (Markham, On......
  • Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (February 17 ' 21)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • February 26, 2025
    ...Pleadings, Class Proceedings Act, 1992, S.O. 1992, c. 6, s. 5(1), Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 24, s. 449, R. v. Wookey, 2016 ONCA 611, Ruth Sullivan, Sullivan on the Construction of Statutes, 6th ed. (Markham, Ont.: LexisNexis Canada 2014) Furney v. Downie, 2025 ONCA 132 Keywords: To......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (August 2-5, 2016)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • August 12, 2016
    ...Provincial Offences Act, Section 131, Public Lands Act, Section 28, Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act, Section 10(1)(a) R v. Wookey, 2016 ONCA 611 [Gillese, Watt and Tulloch JJ.A.] Counsel: J.S. Wilkinson, for the appellant Wilson, for the respondent Keywords: Criminal Law, Food and Drugs ......
2 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Regulation of Drugs in Canada. The Food and Drugs act and Related Intellectual Property Regimes - 2024 Part II
    • December 22, 2023
    ...118 R v Wetmore, [1983] 2 SCR 284 ................................................................ 3–4, 10 R v Wookey, 2016 ONCA 611 ..............................................................................5 Reference re Assisted Human Reproduction Act, 2010 SCC 61, [2010] 3 SCR 457 ........
  • Introduction
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Regulation of Drugs in Canada. The Food and Drugs act and Related Intellectual Property Regimes - 2024 Part I
    • December 22, 2023
    ...v Minister of Health , an unreported decision of the Federal Court in File No T-1501-13 (24 October 2014). 6 CRC, c 870. 7 R v Wookey , 2016 ONCA 611. 8 2012 FC 1465 at para 38. In this case, the Federal Court dismissed an application for judicial review brought by Zen Cigarettes challengin......