R. v. Zakos
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Judge | Feldman,MacPherson,Thorburn |
| Citation | 2022 ONCA 121 |
| Docket Number | C68429 |
| Date | 11 February 2022 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
7 practice notes
-
Stays of Proceedings
...diferent with websites and other 246 R v Olazo , 2012 BCCA 59 at para 25. 247 R v Ahmad , supra note 5 at para 64. See also R v Zakos , 2022 ONCA 121 at paras 45-50. 248 R v Barnes , supra note 230 at 463, Lamer CJ (emphasis in original). 249 Ibid at 460-463. Dissenting in Barnes , McLachli......
-
Table of Cases
...160 Yumnu, R v, 2012 SCC 73 ................................................... 104 Zakos, R v, 2022 ONCA 121 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114 Zarecky, R v, 2018 ONCJ 191 ................................................ ......
-
R v. Lymych
...on the one hand, or an opportunity to commit an offence, on the other (the investigation/opportunity approach). (See e.g. R v Zakos, 2022 ONCA 121; Imoro; and R v Townsend, [1997] OJ No 6516 (ONCJ (GD)).) In some child luring cases, the courts have looked at whether it was the police ......
-
R. v. Vieira
...objective facts, not on a mere hunch, even if grounded in an officer’s experience: R. v. Chehil, 2013 SCC 49, at para. 47; R. v. Zakos, 2022 ONCA 121, at paras. 36-37, 42. The requirement that an officer have reasonable suspicion is not only a statutory requirement, but also a constitutiona......
Get Started for Free
6 cases
-
R v. Lymych
...on the one hand, or an opportunity to commit an offence, on the other (the investigation/opportunity approach). (See e.g. R v Zakos, 2022 ONCA 121; Imoro; and R v Townsend, [1997] OJ No 6516 (ONCJ (GD)).) In some child luring cases, the courts have looked at whether it was the police ......
-
R. v. Vieira
...objective facts, not on a mere hunch, even if grounded in an officer’s experience: R. v. Chehil, 2013 SCC 49, at para. 47; R. v. Zakos, 2022 ONCA 121, at paras. 36-37, 42. The requirement that an officer have reasonable suspicion is not only a statutory requirement, but also a constitutiona......
-
R. v. Davy
...to a reasonable suspicion. She relies on the decisions of R. v. Vieira, 2024 ONCJ 55, R. v. Flight, 2014 ABCA 185, and R. v. Zakos, 2022 ONCA 121, as authority for this [16] I note that Vieira involved an impaired driving investigation wherein the police officer attended the scene of an acc......
-
R. v. Handley
...her training or experience to make otherwise equivocal information probative, despite this I believe she fell just short (R. v. Zakos, 2022 ONCA 121 at para. [25] I agree with the parties that Cst. McFarlane did have grounds to make a demand pursuant to s. 320.27(2); that is, (i) she was la......
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
Stays of Proceedings
...diferent with websites and other 246 R v Olazo , 2012 BCCA 59 at para 25. 247 R v Ahmad , supra note 5 at para 64. See also R v Zakos , 2022 ONCA 121 at paras 45-50. 248 R v Barnes , supra note 230 at 463, Lamer CJ (emphasis in original). 249 Ibid at 460-463. Dissenting in Barnes , McLachli......
-
Table of Cases
...160 Yumnu, R v, 2012 SCC 73 ................................................... 104 Zakos, R v, 2022 ONCA 121 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114 Zarecky, R v, 2018 ONCJ 191 ................................................ ......
