R v Zolmer, 2019 ABCA 93

JudgeThe Honourable Mr. Justice Jack Watson; The Honourable Madam Justice Frederica Schutz; The Honourable Madam Justice Michelle Crighton
CourtCourt of Appeal (Alberta)
Case DateMarch 13, 2019
JurisdictionAlberta
Citations2019 ABCA 93
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
16 practice notes
  • R v Chapman, 2020 SKCA 11
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 4 Febrero 2020
    ...had been committed. See also Todd; R v Maxim, 2018 SKCA 57, 416 CRR (2d) 165 [Maxim]; R v Danielson, 2017 ABCA 422; and R v Zolmer, 2019 ABCA 93, 373 CCC (3d) 162, for other examples of cases in which officers based reasonable suspicion on information similar to that which the officers had ......
  • R v Moyles, 2019 SKCA 72
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 30 Julio 2019
    ...R v Campbell, 2018 NSCA 42 at para 17, 362 CCC (3d) 104; R v McGuffie, 2016 ONCA 365 at para 64, 336 CCC (3d) 486 [McGuffie]; R v Zolmer, 2019 ABCA 93 at para 27, 373 CCC (3d) 162; R v Knoblauch, 2018 SKCA 15 at paras 49 and 51, [2018] 3 WWR 443. [59] Justice Cromwell described the applicab......
  • R v Steadman,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 6 Octubre 2021
    ...level of deference owed on issues of fact is well established: see eg R v Côté, 2011 SCC 46 at paras 44, 51, [2011] 3 SCR 215; R v Zolmer, 2019 ABCA 93 at para 27, 373 CCC (3d) 162; R v Richard, 2013 MBCA 105 at para 48, 304 CCC (3d) 383. By comparison, the question of whether or not the fa......
  • R v Lewis, 2019 ABCA 311
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 26 Agosto 2019
    ...‘apparent error as to the applicable principles or rules of law’: R v Law, 2002 SCC 10 at para 32, [2002] 1 SCR 227.” See also R v Zolmer, 2019 ABCA 93 at paras 27 to 29, 373 CCC (3d) 162. [6] In our view, the decision of this trial judge did not add to or subtract from the relevant legal t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
15 cases
  • R v Chapman, 2020 SKCA 11
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 4 Febrero 2020
    ...had been committed. See also Todd; R v Maxim, 2018 SKCA 57, 416 CRR (2d) 165 [Maxim]; R v Danielson, 2017 ABCA 422; and R v Zolmer, 2019 ABCA 93, 373 CCC (3d) 162, for other examples of cases in which officers based reasonable suspicion on information similar to that which the officers had ......
  • R v Moyles, 2019 SKCA 72
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 30 Julio 2019
    ...R v Campbell, 2018 NSCA 42 at para 17, 362 CCC (3d) 104; R v McGuffie, 2016 ONCA 365 at para 64, 336 CCC (3d) 486 [McGuffie]; R v Zolmer, 2019 ABCA 93 at para 27, 373 CCC (3d) 162; R v Knoblauch, 2018 SKCA 15 at paras 49 and 51, [2018] 3 WWR 443. [59] Justice Cromwell described the applicab......
  • R v Steadman,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 6 Octubre 2021
    ...level of deference owed on issues of fact is well established: see eg R v Côté, 2011 SCC 46 at paras 44, 51, [2011] 3 SCR 215; R v Zolmer, 2019 ABCA 93 at para 27, 373 CCC (3d) 162; R v Richard, 2013 MBCA 105 at para 48, 304 CCC (3d) 383. By comparison, the question of whether or not the fa......
  • R v Vaillancourt, 2019 ABCA 317
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 3 Septiembre 2019
    ...evidence absent clear and determinative error: R v Côté, 2011 SCC 46 at paras 51-52; R v MacMillan, 2013 ONCA 109 at para 43; R v Zolmer, 2019 ABCA 93 at para 86; Koczab at paras 12-15. Nor is deference to findings of fact, including good faith, lessened simply because the s. 8 Charter appl......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT