R. v. Zora, 2020 SCC 14

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeWagner, Richard; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah; Kasirer, Nicholas
Citation2020 SCC 14
Docket Number38540
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Date18 June 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
176 practice notes
  • R. v. Chouhan, 2021 SCC 26
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • June 25, 2021
    ...v. R.E.M., 2008 SCC 51, [2008] 3 S.C.R. 3; R. v. Gladue, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 688; R. v. Golden, 2001 SCC 83, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 679; R. v. Zora, 2020 SCC 14; R. v. Myers, 2019 SCC 18, [2019] 2 S.C.R. 105; R. v. Oakes, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 103; R. v. King, 2019 ONSC 6386, 148 O.R. (3d) 618; Batson v. Ke......
  • R. v. Tayo Tompouba,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • May 3, 2024
    ...[1995] 4 S.C.R. 253; R. v. Bevan, [1993] 2 S.C.R. 599; R. v. Romeo, [1991] 1 S.C.R. 86; R. v. Morin, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 345; R. v. Zora, 2020 SCC 14, [2020] 2 S.C.R. 3; R. v. MacGillivray, [1995] 1 S.C.R. 890; R. v. Wolkins, 2005 NSCA 2, 229 N.S.R. (2d) 222; R. v. Lohrer, 2004 SCC 80, [2004] 3......
  • R v Tayo Tompouba,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • May 3, 2024
    ...[1995] 4 S.C.R. 253; R. v. Bevan, [1993] 2 S.C.R. 599; R. v. Romeo, [1991] 1 S.C.R. 86; R. v. Morin, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 345; R. v. Zora, 2020 SCC 14, [2020] 2 S.C.R. 3; R. v. MacGillivray, [1995] 1 S.C.R. 890; R. v. Wolkins, 2005 NSCA 2, 229 N.S.R. (2d) 222; R. v. Lohrer, 2004 SCC 80, [2004] 3......
  • R. v. Khill, 2021 SCC 37
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • October 14, 2021
    ...(3d) 61; R. v. Gunning, 2005 SCC 27, [2005] 1 S.C.R. 627; R. v. Szczerbaniwicz, 2010 SCC 15, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 455; R. v. Zora, 2020 SCC 14; Rizzo & Rizzo Shoes Ltd. (Re), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 27; R. v. Soltys (1980), 8 M.V.R. 59; Soerensen v. Sood (1994), 123 Sask. R. 72; State......
  • Get Started for Free
152 cases
  • R. v. Chouhan, 2021 SCC 26
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • June 25, 2021
    ...v. R.E.M., 2008 SCC 51, [2008] 3 S.C.R. 3; R. v. Gladue, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 688; R. v. Golden, 2001 SCC 83, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 679; R. v. Zora, 2020 SCC 14; R. v. Myers, 2019 SCC 18, [2019] 2 S.C.R. 105; R. v. Oakes, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 103; R. v. King, 2019 ONSC 6386, 148 O.R. (3d) 618; Batson v. Ke......
  • R. v. Khill, 2021 SCC 37
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • October 14, 2021
    ...(3d) 61; R. v. Gunning, 2005 SCC 27, [2005] 1 S.C.R. 627; R. v. Szczerbaniwicz, 2010 SCC 15, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 455; R. v. Zora, 2020 SCC 14; Rizzo & Rizzo Shoes Ltd. (Re), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 27; R. v. Soltys (1980), 8 M.V.R. 59; Soerensen v. Sood (1994), 123 Sask. R. 72; State......
  • R. v. Tayo Tompouba, 2024 SCC 16
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • May 3, 2024
    ...[1995] 4 S.C.R. 253; R. v. Bevan, [1993] 2 S.C.R. 599; R. v. Romeo, [1991] 1 S.C.R. 86; R. v. Morin, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 345; R. v. Zora, 2020 SCC 14, [2020] 2 S.C.R. 3; R. v. MacGillivray, [1995] 1 S.C.R. 890; R. v. Wolkins, 2005 NSCA 2, 229 N.S.R. (2d) 222; R. v. Lohrer, 2004 SCC 80, [2004] 3......
  • R v Tayo Tompouba,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • May 3, 2024
    ...[1995] 4 S.C.R. 253; R. v. Bevan, [1993] 2 S.C.R. 599; R. v. Romeo, [1991] 1 S.C.R. 86; R. v. Morin, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 345; R. v. Zora, 2020 SCC 14, [2020] 2 S.C.R. 3; R. v. MacGillivray, [1995] 1 S.C.R. 890; R. v. Wolkins, 2005 NSCA 2, 229 N.S.R. (2d) 222; R. v. Lohrer, 2004 SCC 80, [2004] 3......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 12 ' 16, 2023)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • June 20, 2023
    ...SCC 32, Loyola High School v. Quebec (Attorney General) 2015 SCC 12,R.v. Oakes [1986] 1 S.C.R. 103, R. v. Singh 2018 ONSC 5336,R.v. Zora 2020 SCC 14, R.v. Antic 2017 SCC 27, R. v. Lippé [1991] 2 S.C.R. 11, Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov 2019 SCC 65, Ruffo v. Con......
24 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Impaired Driving and Other Criminal Code Driving Offences, 2nd Edition
    • May 2, 2023
    ...240 Zarinchang, R v , 2010 ONCA 286 .............................................. 443 Zora, R v , 2020 SCC 14 .................................................... 90, 165 Zoravkovic, R v , 1998 CanLII 3202, 112 OAC 119 (CA) ............................. 283 Zylinski, R v , 2009 ABPC 226 ........
  • Notes
    • Canada
    • Understanding Canada Drafting, Interpreting, and Applying Legislation Part Two. Interpreting and Applying Legislation
    • August 22, 2023
    ..., [2007] 2 SCR 292 at para 53. 68 Ibid. 69 Kazemi v Islamic Republic of Iran , above note 50 at para 63. 70 See, for example, R v Zora , 2020 SCC 14 applying the presumption that subjective intent is required to convict for serious ofences. 71 See Pong Marketing and Promotions Inc v Ontario......
  • Fail or Refuse Screening Demand: Section 320.15(1)
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Impaired Driving and Other Criminal Code Driving Offences, 2nd Edition
    • May 2, 2023
    ...said by Frankel J of the British Columbia Court of Appeal, in R v Goleski , to have been a codification of the common law.55 49 R v Zora , 2020 SCC 14 at para 37. 50 R v Goleski , 2015 SCC 6 . 51 Regina v Lee’s Poultry Ltd , 1985 CanLII 166, 43 CR (3d) 289 (Ont CA) ; R v Goleski , 2014 BCCA......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Criminal Law. Eighth edition
    • September 1, 2022
    ...505 R v Zlatic, [1993] 2 SCR 29, 79 CCC (3d) 466, [1993] SCJ No 43 ..............519, 522 R v Zora, 2020 SCC 14 ....................51, 169, 197, 200, 201, 216, 222, 225, 227, 248, 575, 578, 590 R v Zundel, [1992] 2 SCR 731, 75 CCC (3d) 449, 16 CR (4th) 1 ......................... 70 Re BC ......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT