Racy v. Leask et al.,
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Ker, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Citation | [2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 846 (SC),2011 BCSC 846,[2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 846 |
| Date | 28 June 2011 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 practice notes
-
Boyle v. Luc,
...and no negligence, then the burden of establishing negligence remains with the plaintiff: Singleton at paras. 2-3; Racy v. Leask, 2011 BCSC 846 at para. 81; Wright v. Mistry, 2017 BCSC 239 at para. [6] The Plaintiff testified......
-
Ziemer v. Wheeler et al.,
...are a substantial number of cases involving motor vehicle collisions with wildlife: see Pitts Enterprises ; Fajardo ; Racy v. Leask , 2011 BCSC 846; Giffen v. Quesnel (1995), 16 M.V.R. (3d) 252 (B.C.S.C.); Berk ; Skinner ; Schneider v. Steure, [1992] B.C.J. No. 491 (S.C.); Maksymetz v. Plam......
-
Dorsett v. Sahib,
...and no negligence, then the burden of establishing negligence remains with the plaintiff: Singleton at paras. 2-3; Racy v. Leask, 2011 BCSC 846 at para. 81; Wright v. Mistry, 2017 BCSC 239 at para. Agony of Collision [13] Counsel for Mr. Dorsett as a defendant in the Sahib Action argued tha......
-
Matthews v. Reed,
...There are a substantial number of cases involving motor vehicle collisions with wildlife: see Pitts Enterprises; Fajardo; Racy v. Leask, 2011 BCSC 846; Giffen v. Quesnel (1995), 16 M.V.R. (3d) 252 (B.C.S.C.); Berk; Skinner; Schneider v. Steure, [1992] B.C.J. No. 491 (S.C.); Maksymetz v......
4 cases
-
Boyle v. Luc,
...and no negligence, then the burden of establishing negligence remains with the plaintiff: Singleton at paras. 2-3; Racy v. Leask, 2011 BCSC 846 at para. 81; Wright v. Mistry, 2017 BCSC 239 at para. [6] The Plaintiff testified......
-
Ziemer v. Wheeler et al.,
...are a substantial number of cases involving motor vehicle collisions with wildlife: see Pitts Enterprises ; Fajardo ; Racy v. Leask , 2011 BCSC 846; Giffen v. Quesnel (1995), 16 M.V.R. (3d) 252 (B.C.S.C.); Berk ; Skinner ; Schneider v. Steure, [1992] B.C.J. No. 491 (S.C.); Maksymetz v. Plam......
-
Dorsett v. Sahib,
...and no negligence, then the burden of establishing negligence remains with the plaintiff: Singleton at paras. 2-3; Racy v. Leask, 2011 BCSC 846 at para. 81; Wright v. Mistry, 2017 BCSC 239 at para. Agony of Collision [13] Counsel for Mr. Dorsett as a defendant in the Sahib Action argued tha......
-
Matthews v. Reed,
...There are a substantial number of cases involving motor vehicle collisions with wildlife: see Pitts Enterprises; Fajardo; Racy v. Leask, 2011 BCSC 846; Giffen v. Quesnel (1995), 16 M.V.R. (3d) 252 (B.C.S.C.); Berk; Skinner; Schneider v. Steure, [1992] B.C.J. No. 491 (S.C.); Maksymetz v......