Rajan v. Hudon
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Judge | Pearlman, J. |
| Citation | [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1678,[2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1678 (SC),2014 BCSC 1678 |
| Date | 04 September 2014 |
| Subject Matter | TORTS,DAMAGES,DAMAGE AWARDS |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
19 practice notes
-
Siu v. Regehr
...may still be divisible where the evidence permits such a division: Scoates v. Dermott, 2012 BCSC 485 at paras. 164–169; Rajan v Hudon, 2014 BCSC 1678; Lakatos v. Lakatos, 2017 BCSC (See also Bradley, paras. 19-20) [118] The parties are in agreement that I should treat the injuries suffered ......
-
Ham v. Dhaliwal
...may still be divisible where the evidence permits such a division: Scoates v. Dermott, 2012 BCSC 485 at paras. 164–169; Rajan v. Hudon, 2014 BCSC 1678 at para. 156; Lakatos v. Lakatos, 2017 BCSC 1990 at para. 214. For example, as was the case in Scoates, while a subsequent accident that agg......
-
Maingot v. Wankowicz
...may still be divisible where the evidence permits such a division: Scoates v. Dermott, 2012 BCSC 485 at paras. 164–169; Rajan v. Hudon, 2014 BCSC 1678; Lakatos v. Lakatos, 2017 BCSC 1990. For example, a subsequent accident that aggravates an injury from an earlier accident may be physically......
-
Lidder v Pearce
...may still be divisible where the evidence permits such a division: Scoates v. Dermott, 2012 BCSC 485 at paras. 164–169; Rajan v Hudon, 2014 BCSC 1678; Lakatos v. Lakatos, 2017 BCSC 1990. [Emphasis added by the Court of Appeal.] [90] In my view, the final proposition in this passage must be ......
Get Started for Free
19 cases
-
Coulombe v. Morris
...each defendant only being responsible for the damage they individually caused: Athey; Khudabux v. McClary, 2018 BCCA 234; Rajan v. Hudon, 2014 BCSC 1678; Kallstrom v. Yip, 2016 BCSC 829; Windsor v. Cawley, 2020 BCSC 678; Neufeldt v. Marcellus, 2020 BCSC 427; Conarroe v. Tallack, 2020 BCSC 6......
-
Siu v. Regehr
...may still be divisible where the evidence permits such a division: Scoates v. Dermott, 2012 BCSC 485 at paras. 164–169; Rajan v Hudon, 2014 BCSC 1678; Lakatos v. Lakatos, 2017 BCSC (See also Bradley, paras. 19-20) [118] The parties are in agreement that I should treat the injuries suffered ......
-
Maingot v. Wankowicz
...may still be divisible where the evidence permits such a division: Scoates v. Dermott, 2012 BCSC 485 at paras. 164–169; Rajan v. Hudon, 2014 BCSC 1678; Lakatos v. Lakatos, 2017 BCSC 1990. For example, a subsequent accident that aggravates an injury from an earlier accident may be physically......
-
Ham v. Dhaliwal
...may still be divisible where the evidence permits such a division: Scoates v. Dermott, 2012 BCSC 485 at paras. 164–169; Rajan v. Hudon, 2014 BCSC 1678 at para. 156; Lakatos v. Lakatos, 2017 BCSC 1990 at para. 214. For example, as was the case in Scoates, while a subsequent accident that agg......
Get Started for Free
