Randhawa v. Canada (Transport), 2017 FC 556
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Case Date | June 07, 2017 |
| Jurisdiction | Canada (Federal) |
| Citations | 2017 FC 556 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
Canadian Maritime Workers Council v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 177
...508 of the Security Regulations; Reference at para 24; Forget v Canada (Transport), 2017 FC 620 at para 13 [Forget]; Randhawa v Canada, 2017 FC 556 at para 22 [Randhawa]; Neale v Canada (Attorney General), 2016 FC 655 at para 8 [Neale (FC)], affirmed in Neale v Canada (Attorney General), 20......
-
Lum v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 797
...his position that he did not pose a risk to public safety because of his association with Subjects A and B (Randhawa v Canada (Transport), 2017 FC 556 at para 42 [Randhawa]). However, his response provided little detail, and the Director General cannot be faulted for not responding to infor......
-
Jackson v. Canada (Attorney General),
...for any concerns regarding the applicant’s suitability to be granted a security clearance” (Randhawa v Canada (Transport), 2017 FC 556 at para 42, citing Wu v Canada (Attorney General), 2016 FC 722 at para 46). The decision is not justified, however, because of the problematic......
-
Varn v. Canada (Attorney General), 2017 FC 1132
...interests of the individual affected and public safety, the interests of the public take precedence (see Randhawa v Canada (Transport), 2017 FC 556 at para 18; Thep-Outhainthany v Canada (Attorney General), 2013 FC 59 at para 17; Salmon at para [49] The Applicant submits that there are many......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
Canadian Maritime Workers Council v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 177
...508 of the Security Regulations; Reference at para 24; Forget v Canada (Transport), 2017 FC 620 at para 13 [Forget]; Randhawa v Canada, 2017 FC 556 at para 22 [Randhawa]; Neale v Canada (Attorney General), 2016 FC 655 at para 8 [Neale (FC)], affirmed in Neale v Canada (Attorney General), 20......
-
Lum v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 797
...his position that he did not pose a risk to public safety because of his association with Subjects A and B (Randhawa v Canada (Transport), 2017 FC 556 at para 42 [Randhawa]). However, his response provided little detail, and the Director General cannot be faulted for not responding to infor......
-
Jackson v. Canada (Attorney General),
...for any concerns regarding the applicant’s suitability to be granted a security clearance” (Randhawa v Canada (Transport), 2017 FC 556 at para 42, citing Wu v Canada (Attorney General), 2016 FC 722 at para 46). The decision is not justified, however, because of the problematic......
-
Varn v. Canada (Attorney General), 2017 FC 1132
...interests of the individual affected and public safety, the interests of the public take precedence (see Randhawa v Canada (Transport), 2017 FC 556 at para 18; Thep-Outhainthany v Canada (Attorney General), 2013 FC 59 at para 17; Salmon at para [49] The Applicant submits that there are many......
Request a trial to view additional results