Rasmussen v. Rasmussen, [2009] Northwest Terr. Cases Uned. 46 (SC)

JurisdictionNorthwest Territories
JudgeSchuler, J.
CourtSupreme Court of Northwest Territories (Canada)
Subject MatterFAMILY LAW
Citation[2009] Northwest Terr. Cases Uned. 46 (SC),2009 NWTSC 46,[2009] Northwest Terr. Cases Uned. 46
Date15 July 2009
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • Heron v. Fabien, [2012] Northwest Terr. Cases Uned. 72 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Northwest Territories (Canada)
    • 26 Septiembre 2012
    ...been a change in circumstances which would justify a variation, rescission or suspension of the earlier order: Rasmussen v. Rasmussen , 2009 NWTSC 46 , at para. 16; Westergreen v. Westergreen , 2011 NWTSC 52. [11] The information that Mr. Fabien has provided includes his tax return summarie......
  • Squires v. Jordan-Paul, 2013 NWTSC 89
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Northwest Territories (Canada)
    • 25 Noviembre 2013
    ...Squires is required to provide evidence to demonstrate that he was unable to meet his child support obligations: Rasmussen v. Rasmussen, 2009 NWTSC 46 at para. 16. He has not demonstrated that he was unable to earn an income which would allow him to meet his child support obligations. There......
2 cases
  • Heron v. Fabien, [2012] Northwest Terr. Cases Uned. 72 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Northwest Territories (Canada)
    • 26 Septiembre 2012
    ...been a change in circumstances which would justify a variation, rescission or suspension of the earlier order: Rasmussen v. Rasmussen , 2009 NWTSC 46 , at para. 16; Westergreen v. Westergreen , 2011 NWTSC 52. [11] The information that Mr. Fabien has provided includes his tax return summarie......
  • Squires v. Jordan-Paul, 2013 NWTSC 89
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Northwest Territories (Canada)
    • 25 Noviembre 2013
    ...Squires is required to provide evidence to demonstrate that he was unable to meet his child support obligations: Rasmussen v. Rasmussen, 2009 NWTSC 46 at para. 16. He has not demonstrated that he was unable to earn an income which would allow him to meet his child support obligations. There......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT