Rau et al. v. Edmonton (City) et al., 2015 ABCA 5
| Judge | Veldhuis, J.A. |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Subject Matter | LAND REGULATION,PRACTICE,ADMINISTRATIVE LAW |
| Citation | 2015 ABCA 5,[2015] A.R. Uned. 2 (CA),[2015] A.R. Uned. 2 |
| Date | 07 January 2015 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
Sellors v. Greenview No. 16 (Municipal District) et al., 2016 ABCA 312
...v. Parkland (County) , 2015 ABCA 231 at paras 2-5. [15] Questions of law include interpretation of Bylaws: Rau v Edmonton (City) , 2015 ABCA 5 at para 13. Nonetheless, some deference is due to an SDAB about specific issues of fact which are the underpinnings of the interpretation for applic......
-
IMD v RAD, 2019 ABQB 963
...and arguments by lay witnesses, and such evidence is given little weight: [citing AHRC v Blue Cross and] Rau v Edmonton (City), 2015 ABCA 5 (CanLII) at para 19. [emphasis [97] While many decisions note that extraneous material can ......
-
Spady v Spady Estate,
...opinion are not permitted and have little to no value: Hovsepian v Westfair Foods Ltd, 2003 ABQB 641 at para 49; Rau v Edmonton (City), 2015 ABCA 5 at para 19; Ubah v Canadian Natural Resources Limited, 2020 ABQB 547 at paras [58] ......
-
PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc v Perpetual Energy Inc,
...based on the evidence, are for the court to decide. Those matters are not properly addressed in an affidavit: Rau v Edmonton (City), 2015 ABCA 5 at para 19; Hovsepian v Westfair Foods Ltd, 2003 ABQB 641 at para 49. In particular, the affiants for the Intervenors purport to opine on issues o......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
Sellors v. Greenview No. 16 (Municipal District) et al., 2016 ABCA 312
...v. Parkland (County) , 2015 ABCA 231 at paras 2-5. [15] Questions of law include interpretation of Bylaws: Rau v Edmonton (City) , 2015 ABCA 5 at para 13. Nonetheless, some deference is due to an SDAB about specific issues of fact which are the underpinnings of the interpretation for applic......
-
IMD v RAD, 2019 ABQB 963
...and arguments by lay witnesses, and such evidence is given little weight: [citing AHRC v Blue Cross and] Rau v Edmonton (City), 2015 ABCA 5 (CanLII) at para 19. [emphasis [97] While many decisions note that extraneous material can ......
-
Spady v Spady Estate,
...opinion are not permitted and have little to no value: Hovsepian v Westfair Foods Ltd, 2003 ABQB 641 at para 49; Rau v Edmonton (City), 2015 ABCA 5 at para 19; Ubah v Canadian Natural Resources Limited, 2020 ABQB 547 at paras [58] ......
-
PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc v Perpetual Energy Inc,
...based on the evidence, are for the court to decide. Those matters are not properly addressed in an affidavit: Rau v Edmonton (City), 2015 ABCA 5 at para 19; Hovsepian v Westfair Foods Ltd, 2003 ABQB 641 at para 49. In particular, the affiants for the Intervenors purport to opine on issues o......
Request a trial to view additional results