Rausch v. Pickering (City), [2012] O.A.C. Uned. 821 (DC)

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeAston, Murray and Harvison Young, JJ.
Citation[2012] O.A.C. Uned. 821 (DC),[2012] O.A.C. Uned. 821,2012 ONSC 4688
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
Subject MatterMUNICIPAL LAW,TORTS,PRACTICE
Date22 August 2012
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • Sources of Authority: Municipal Planning Statutes
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Land-use Planning
    • June 23, 2017
    ...statutory injunction would be refused only in exceptional circumstances. 267 In Montréal (Ville) c Auberge des Glycines inc (Auberge 261 2012 ONSC 4688. 262 See, for example, Tuteckyj v Winnipeg (City ), 2012 MBCA 100. 263 See, for example, Portovest Inc v Prince Albert (City) , 2012 SKQB 9......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Land-use Planning
    • June 23, 2017
    ...160 Rassier v Houim, 488 NW2d 635 (ND 1992) .................................................... 160 Rausch v Pickering (City), 2012 ONSC 4688 ..................................................... 352 Reference re Certain Titles to Land in Ontario, [1973] 2 OR 613, 35 DLR (3d) 10, [1973] OJ......
2 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Land-use Planning
    • June 23, 2017
    ...160 Rassier v Houim, 488 NW2d 635 (ND 1992) .................................................... 160 Rausch v Pickering (City), 2012 ONSC 4688 ..................................................... 352 Reference re Certain Titles to Land in Ontario, [1973] 2 OR 613, 35 DLR (3d) 10, [1973] OJ......
  • Sources of Authority: Municipal Planning Statutes
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Land-use Planning
    • June 23, 2017
    ...statutory injunction would be refused only in exceptional circumstances. 267 In Montréal (Ville) c Auberge des Glycines inc (Auberge 261 2012 ONSC 4688. 262 See, for example, Tuteckyj v Winnipeg (City ), 2012 MBCA 100. 263 See, for example, Portovest Inc v Prince Albert (City) , 2012 SKQB 9......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT