REARDON v. RODWAY, 2017 SKQB 324
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | MEGAW |
| Citation | 2017 SKQB 324 |
| Docket Number | FLD 208 of 2013 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
| Date | 27 October 2017 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
Cohabitational Relationships
...there is no registered domestic partnership, see MacPherson v Williams, 2019 NSSC 17. Broda v Morin, 2015 SKQB 240; Reardon v Rodway, 2017 SKQB 324. See also Stanford v Stanford, 2018 SKQB 221; Leonhardt v Shlahetka, 2019 SKQB See Dwyer v Bussey, 2017 NLCA 68. Ibid. Thew v Nichol, 2015 ABQB......
-
Cohabitational Relationships
...there is no registered domestic partnership, see MacPherson v Williams, 2019 NSSC 17. Broda v Morin, 2015 SKQB 240; Reardon v Rodway, 2017 SKQB 324. See also Stanford v Stanford, 2018 SKQB 221; Leonhardt v Shlahetka, 2019 SKQB Chapter 3: Cohabitational Relationships prescribed conditions, N......
-
Rodway v Reardon, 2019 SKCA 99
...Honourable Mr. Justice Whitmore In concurrence: The Honourable Madam Justice Schwann The Honourable Mr. Justice Leurer On Appeal From: 2017 SKQB 324, Regina Appeal January 9, 2019 Counsel: James Korpan, Q.C., for the Appellant Joanne Moser, Q.C., for the Respondent Whitmore J.A. I. Introduc......
-
A.W. v. N.P.,
...In Reardon v Rodway, 2017 SKQB 324 at para 102, Megaw J. noted that the treatment of debts in the division of family property, aside from the family home, is a matter within the trial judge’s discretion. He cited Russell v Russell (1999), 180 Sask R 196 (CA), in which Jackson J.A. st......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 cases
-
Rodway v Reardon, 2019 SKCA 99
...Honourable Mr. Justice Whitmore In concurrence: The Honourable Madam Justice Schwann The Honourable Mr. Justice Leurer On Appeal From: 2017 SKQB 324, Regina Appeal January 9, 2019 Counsel: James Korpan, Q.C., for the Appellant Joanne Moser, Q.C., for the Respondent Whitmore J.A. I. Introduc......
-
A.W. v. N.P.,
...In Reardon v Rodway, 2017 SKQB 324 at para 102, Megaw J. noted that the treatment of debts in the division of family property, aside from the family home, is a matter within the trial judge’s discretion. He cited Russell v Russell (1999), 180 Sask R 196 (CA), in which Jackson J.A. st......
-
ANDERSON v. ANDERSON, 2019 SKQB 35
...[194] It is also important to keep in mind the residual authority the FPA provides. As noted by Justice Megaw in Reardon v Rodway, 2017 SKQB 324: 92 In Burland v. Burland, 2016 SKQB 329, Smith J. relied on the following authorities to determine allowing an exemption would be unfair or [38] ......
2 books & journal articles
-
Cohabitational Relationships
...there is no registered domestic partnership, see MacPherson v Williams, 2019 NSSC 17. Broda v Morin, 2015 SKQB 240; Reardon v Rodway, 2017 SKQB 324. See also Stanford v Stanford, 2018 SKQB 221; Leonhardt v Shlahetka, 2019 SKQB See Dwyer v Bussey, 2017 NLCA 68. Ibid. Thew v Nichol, 2015 ABQB......
-
Cohabitational Relationships
...there is no registered domestic partnership, see MacPherson v Williams, 2019 NSSC 17. Broda v Morin, 2015 SKQB 240; Reardon v Rodway, 2017 SKQB 324. See also Stanford v Stanford, 2018 SKQB 221; Leonhardt v Shlahetka, 2019 SKQB Chapter 3: Cohabitational Relationships prescribed conditions, N......