Ingram v Alberta (Chief Medical Officer of Health),

JudgeHonourable Madam Justice Anne L. Kirker
Neutral Citation2020 ABQB 806
Docket Number2001 14300
Citation2020 ABQB 806
Date08 January 2021
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • Gateway Bible Baptist Church et al. v. Manitoba et al.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • 21 Octubre 2021
    ...International Celebration Church v. Ontario (Attorney General), 2020 ONSC 8027; Ingram v. Alberta (Chief Medical Officer of Health), 2020 ABQB 806). Rational Connection Between the Infringing Measures and the Objectives [296]   In order to demonstrate a rational connection, a gove......
  • Naoum v. Canada (Attorney General), 2022 FC 1463
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 27 Octubre 2022
    ...challenging provincial measures: Taylor v Newfoundland and Labrador, 2020 NLSC 125, Ingram v Alberta (Chief Medical Officer of Health), 2020 ABQB 806, Beaudoin v British Columbia, 2021 BCSC 512, Lachance c Procureur général du Québec, 2021 QCCS 4721, Murray et al v Attorney G......
2 cases
  • Gateway Bible Baptist Church et al. v. Manitoba et al.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • 21 Octubre 2021
    ...International Celebration Church v. Ontario (Attorney General), 2020 ONSC 8027; Ingram v. Alberta (Chief Medical Officer of Health), 2020 ABQB 806). Rational Connection Between the Infringing Measures and the Objectives [296]   In order to demonstrate a rational connection, a gove......
  • Naoum v. Canada (Attorney General), 2022 FC 1463
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 27 Octubre 2022
    ...challenging provincial measures: Taylor v Newfoundland and Labrador, 2020 NLSC 125, Ingram v Alberta (Chief Medical Officer of Health), 2020 ABQB 806, Beaudoin v British Columbia, 2021 BCSC 512, Lachance c Procureur général du Québec, 2021 QCCS 4721, Murray et al v Attorney G......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT