Red v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Citation2018 FC 1271
Date17 December 2018

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 practice notes
  • Garcia v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • February 11, 2021
    ...on the evidence and facts of the case. [41] In this regard, I believe the approach taken in Red v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1271, another case involving an affidavit of desistance as part of a withdrawal of charges in the Philippines, is instructive. At paragraph 28 of t......
  • Cruz v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • March 31, 2020
    ...analysis as between the acts of Estafa in the Philippines and s 332(1) of the Criminal Code (Red v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1271 (“Red”)). He submits that the Migration Officer’s entire analysis was based on the written admission from the Applicant’s wife but it contain......
  • Urdas v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 30, 2019
    ...latter. This distinguishes the present factual matrix with that which existed in Red v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1271, at paras 26-28, where the complainant filed an Affidavit of Desistance after becoming aware of a “misaccounting and a misapprehension of th......
3 cases
  • Garcia v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • February 11, 2021
    ...on the evidence and facts of the case. [41] In this regard, I believe the approach taken in Red v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1271, another case involving an affidavit of desistance as part of a withdrawal of charges in the Philippines, is instructive. At paragraph 28 of t......
  • Cruz v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • March 31, 2020
    ...analysis as between the acts of Estafa in the Philippines and s 332(1) of the Criminal Code (Red v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1271 (“Red”)). He submits that the Migration Officer’s entire analysis was based on the written admission from the Applicant’s wife but it contain......
  • Urdas v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 30, 2019
    ...latter. This distinguishes the present factual matrix with that which existed in Red v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1271, at paras 26-28, where the complainant filed an Affidavit of Desistance after becoming aware of a “misaccounting and a misapprehension of th......