Reference re Broadcasting Regulatory Policy CRTC 2010-167 and Broadcasting Order CRTC 2010-168, [2012] 3 SCR 489

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeMcLachlin, Beverley; LeBel, Louis; Deschamps, Marie; Fish, Morris J.; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Rothstein, Marshall; Cromwell, Thomas Albert; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache
Citation[2012] 3 SCR 489,2012 SCC 68
Date13 December 2012
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Docket Number34231
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
41 practice notes
  • TELUS c. Canada (Procureur général),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 2, 2014
    ...9, [2008] 1 S.C.R. 190; Reference re Broadcasting Regulatory Policy CRTC 2010-167 and Broadcasting Order CRTC 2010-168, 2012 SCC 68, [2012] 3 S.C.R. 489; ATCO Gas and Pipelines Ltd. v. Alberta (Energy and Utilities Board), 2006 SCC 4, [2006] 1 S.C.R. 140; Vaziri v. Canada (Minister of Citiz......
  • ATCO Gas and Pipelines Ltd. et al. v. Alberta Utilities Commission, 2014 ABCA 397
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • May 9, 2014
    ...(Attorney General) v. Mowat, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 471; 422 N.R. 248; 2011 SCC 53, refd to. [para. 65]. Reference Re Broadcasting Act, [2012] 3 S.C.R. 489; 437 N.R. 124; 2012 SCC 68, refd to. [para. 65, footnote 25]. Toronto Hydro-Electric System Ltd. v. Ontario Energy Board (2008), 93 O.R.(3d) 3......
  • Bell Canada c. 7262591 Canada Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • October 1, 2018
    ...38.CASES CITEDCONSIDERED:Reference re Broadcasting Regulatory Policy CRTC 2010-167 and Broadcasting Order CRTC 2010-168, 2012 SCC 68, [2012] 3 S.C.R. 489; R. v. Henry, 2005 SCC 76, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 609; West Fraser Mills Ltd. v. British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal)......
  • West Fraser Mills Ltd. v. British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal), 2018 SCC 22
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • May 18, 2018
    ...Queen, [1958] S.C.R. 216; Reference re Broadcasting Regulatory Policy CRTC 2010‑167 and Broadcasting Order CRTC 2010‑168, 2012 SCC 68, [2012] 3 S.C.R. 489; Agraira v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2013 SCC 36, [2013] 2 S.C.R. 559; Delta Air Lines Inc. v. Lukács, 2018 SC......
  • Get Started for Free
37 cases
  • TELUS c. Canada (Procureur général),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 2, 2014
    ...9, [2008] 1 S.C.R. 190; Reference re Broadcasting Regulatory Policy CRTC 2010-167 and Broadcasting Order CRTC 2010-168, 2012 SCC 68, [2012] 3 S.C.R. 489; ATCO Gas and Pipelines Ltd. v. Alberta (Energy and Utilities Board), 2006 SCC 4, [2006] 1 S.C.R. 140; Vaziri v. Canada (Minister of Citiz......
  • ATCO Gas and Pipelines Ltd. et al. v. Alberta Utilities Commission, 2014 ABCA 397
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • May 9, 2014
    ...(Attorney General) v. Mowat, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 471; 422 N.R. 248; 2011 SCC 53, refd to. [para. 65]. Reference Re Broadcasting Act, [2012] 3 S.C.R. 489; 437 N.R. 124; 2012 SCC 68, refd to. [para. 65, footnote 25]. Toronto Hydro-Electric System Ltd. v. Ontario Energy Board (2008), 93 O.R.(3d) 3......
  • Bell Canada c. 7262591 Canada Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • October 1, 2018
    ...38.CASES CITEDCONSIDERED:Reference re Broadcasting Regulatory Policy CRTC 2010-167 and Broadcasting Order CRTC 2010-168, 2012 SCC 68, [2012] 3 S.C.R. 489; R. v. Henry, 2005 SCC 76, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 609; West Fraser Mills Ltd. v. British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal)......
  • West Fraser Mills Ltd. v. British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal), 2018 SCC 22
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • May 18, 2018
    ...Queen, [1958] S.C.R. 216; Reference re Broadcasting Regulatory Policy CRTC 2010‑167 and Broadcasting Order CRTC 2010‑168, 2012 SCC 68, [2012] 3 S.C.R. 489; Agraira v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2013 SCC 36, [2013] 2 S.C.R. 559; Delta Air Lines Inc. v. Lukács, 2018 SC......
  • Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
  • The Tiger In The Jungle: A Tribute To Neil Finkelstein
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • September 11, 2018
    ...independence from outside influence. Reference re Broadcasting Regulatory Policy CRTC 2010-167 and Broadcasting Order CRTC 2010-168, [2012] 3 SCR 489 Neil had an enormous impact on broadcasting and telecommunications law, particularly in the final decade of his career. As counsel for Cogeco......
  • Lobbying In Canada After R. v. Carson
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • March 29, 2018
    ...Court of Canada held in Reference re Broadcasting Regulatory Policy CRTC 2010-167 and Broadcasting Order CRTC 2010-168, 2012 SCC 68, [2012] 3 S.C.R. 489, at para. 37, "Parliament is presumed to intend 'harmony, coherence, and consistency between statutes dealing with the same subject matter......
2 books & journal articles
  • Intellectual Property in Canada's Federal Courts: An Empirical Review of Proceedings
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Federal Court of Appeal and the Federal Court. 50 Years of History
    • October 4, 2021
    ...property” tangentially, such as by way of example or as part of a list — resulted in six additional cases being found ([2018] 2 SCR 643; [2012] 3 SCR 489; [2012] 3 SCR 3; [2012] 1 SCR 23; [2003] 1 SCR 178; and [1999] 1 SCR 142). Finally, the same search was repeated using CanLII, resulting ......
  • Justifying true questions of jurisdiction.
    • Canada
    • Ottawa Law Review Vol. 46 No. 2, September 2015
    • September 22, 2015
    ...Ibid at paras 27-30. (158) Reference re Broadcasting Regulatory Policy CRTC 2010-167 and Broadcasting Order CRTC 2010-168, 2012 SCC 68, [2012] 3 SCR 489 (stating the CRTC is not empowered to create rules which prevail over legislative acts at para 78). Also, when a court's existing decision......