Reference re Code of Civil Procedure (Que.), art. 35,

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeWagner, Richard; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Côté, Suzanne; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah
Neutral Citation2021 SCC 27
Citation2021 SCC 27
Date30 June 2021
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Docket Number38837
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 practice notes
  • Judicially Licensed Unconstitutionality.
    • Canada
    • University of British Columbia Law Review Vol. 55 No. 2, November 2022
    • 1 Noviembre 2022
    ...being Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (UK), 1982, c 11 [Charter]. (14) 2020 SCC 38 [Ontario v G]. (15) See ibid at paras 84-99. (16) 2021 SCC 27. (17) See e.g. David Dyzenhaus, "Schmitt V Dicey: Are States of Emergency Inside or Outside the Legal Order?" (2006) 27 Cardozo L Rev (18) See e......
  • British Columbia (Attorney General) v Le,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 17 Mayo 2023
    ...legislation, endorsing the statement of Chief Justice Wagner, dissenting in part, in Reference re Code of Civil Procedure (Que.), Art. 35, 2021 SCC 27, to the effect that courts should not interfere with the ability of the provinces and territories to “experiment with new forms of ac......
  • Poorkid Investments Inc. v Ontario (Solicitor General),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 15 Marzo 2023
    ...as supporting a “strong constitutional base for national unity”. In Reference re Code of Civil Procedure (Que.), art. 35, 2021 SCC 27, 459 D.L.R. (4th) 555 (“ Quebec Reference”), the Supreme Court emphasized that the judicature provisions, along with s. 92(14), w......
  • 2023 ONCA 172,
    • Canada
    • 1 Enero 2023
    ...as supporting a “strong constitutional base for national unity”. In Reference re Code of Civil Procedure (Que.), art. 35, 2021 SCC 27, 459 D.L.R. (4th) 555 (“ Quebec Reference”), the Supreme Court emphasized that the judicature provisions, along with s. 92(14), w......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 cases
  • British Columbia (Attorney General) v Le,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 17 Mayo 2023
    ...legislation, endorsing the statement of Chief Justice Wagner, dissenting in part, in Reference re Code of Civil Procedure (Que.), Art. 35, 2021 SCC 27, to the effect that courts should not interfere with the ability of the provinces and territories to “experiment with new forms of ac......
  • 2023 ONCA 172,
    • Canada
    • 1 Enero 2023
    ...as supporting a “strong constitutional base for national unity”. In Reference re Code of Civil Procedure (Que.), art. 35, 2021 SCC 27, 459 D.L.R. (4th) 555 (“ Quebec Reference”), the Supreme Court emphasized that the judicature provisions, along with s. 92(14), w......
  • Poorkid Investments Inc. v Ontario (Solicitor General),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 15 Marzo 2023
    ...as supporting a “strong constitutional base for national unity”. In Reference re Code of Civil Procedure (Que.), art. 35, 2021 SCC 27, 459 D.L.R. (4th) 555 (“ Quebec Reference”), the Supreme Court emphasized that the judicature provisions, along with s. 92(14), w......
1 firm's commentaries
  • Changes Made To Québec's Code Of Civil Procedure By Bill 8
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 12 Abril 2023
    ...members of the Barreau du Québec. Footnotes 1. https://www.assnat.qc.ca/en/travaux-parlementaires/projets-loi/projet-loi-8-43-1.html 2. 2021 SCC 27 3. 4. See in this regard section 7 of Bill 8 and new articles 535.1 to 535.15 C.C.P. Read the original article on GowlingWLG.com. The content o......
1 books & journal articles
  • Judicially Licensed Unconstitutionality.
    • Canada
    • University of British Columbia Law Review Vol. 55 No. 2, November 2022
    • 1 Noviembre 2022
    ...being Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (UK), 1982, c 11 [Charter]. (14) 2020 SCC 38 [Ontario v G]. (15) See ibid at paras 84-99. (16) 2021 SCC 27. (17) See e.g. David Dyzenhaus, "Schmitt V Dicey: Are States of Emergency Inside or Outside the Legal Order?" (2006) 27 Cardozo L Rev (18) See e......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT