Reference re Code of Civil Procedure (Que.), art. 35, 2021 SCC 27
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | Wagner, Richard; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Côté, Suzanne; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 SCC 27 |
| Citation | 2021 SCC 27 |
| Date | 30 June 2021 |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Docket Number | 38837 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 practice notes
-
Judicially Licensed Unconstitutionality.
...being Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (UK), 1982, c 11 [Charter]. (14) 2020 SCC 38 [Ontario v G]. (15) See ibid at paras 84-99. (16) 2021 SCC 27. (17) See e.g. David Dyzenhaus, "Schmitt V Dicey: Are States of Emergency Inside or Outside the Legal Order?" (2006) 27 Cardozo L Rev (18) See e......
-
British Columbia (Attorney General) v Le,
...legislation, endorsing the statement of Chief Justice Wagner, dissenting in part, in Reference re Code of Civil Procedure (Que.), Art. 35, 2021 SCC 27, to the effect that courts should not interfere with the ability of the provinces and territories to “experiment with new forms of ac......
-
Watch v. Canada (Attorney General), 2024 FCA 158
...55; British Columbia v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd., 2005 SCC 49 at paras. 58-59; Reference re Code of Civil Procedure (Que), art 35, 2021 SCC 27 at paras. 50-51). And, in a constitutional democracy like ours, it means both that Parliament and the legislatures are constrained by the distri......
-
Ontario Place Protectors v HMK in Right of Ontario,
...Act, [1981] 1 S.C.R. 714; MacMillan Bloedel Ltd. v. Simpson, [1995] 4 S.C.R. 725; Reference re Code of Civil Procedure (Que.), art. 35, 2021 SCC 27, [2021] 2 S.C.R. 26 Legislation that denies access to justice has met a similar fate: Trial Lawyers Assn. of British Columbia v. British Columb......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
-
British Columbia (Attorney General) v Le,
...legislation, endorsing the statement of Chief Justice Wagner, dissenting in part, in Reference re Code of Civil Procedure (Que.), Art. 35, 2021 SCC 27, to the effect that courts should not interfere with the ability of the provinces and territories to “experiment with new forms of ac......
-
Watch v. Canada (Attorney General), 2024 FCA 158
...55; British Columbia v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd., 2005 SCC 49 at paras. 58-59; Reference re Code of Civil Procedure (Que), art 35, 2021 SCC 27 at paras. 50-51). And, in a constitutional democracy like ours, it means both that Parliament and the legislatures are constrained by the distri......
-
Ontario Place Protectors v HMK in Right of Ontario,
...Act, [1981] 1 S.C.R. 714; MacMillan Bloedel Ltd. v. Simpson, [1995] 4 S.C.R. 725; Reference re Code of Civil Procedure (Que.), art. 35, 2021 SCC 27, [2021] 2 S.C.R. 26 Legislation that denies access to justice has met a similar fate: Trial Lawyers Assn. of British Columbia v. British Columb......
-
Lesenko v Wild Rose Ready Mix Ltd,
...– absent constitutional amendment. Côté and Martin JJ, writing for the majority in Reference re Code of Civil Procedure (Que.), art. 35, 2021 SCC 27 (the “ Quebec Reference”) at para 53, endorsed La Forest J's statement in dissent in Scowby v Glendinning, [1986] 2 SCR 226 at 250 that “judic......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Changes Made To Québec's Code Of Civil Procedure By Bill 8
...members of the Barreau du Québec. Footnotes 1. https://www.assnat.qc.ca/en/travaux-parlementaires/projets-loi/projet-loi-8-43-1.html 2. 2021 SCC 27 3. 4. See in this regard section 7 of Bill 8 and new articles 535.1 to 535.15 C.C.P. Read the original article on GowlingWLG.com. The content o......
1 books & journal articles
-
Judicially Licensed Unconstitutionality.
...being Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (UK), 1982, c 11 [Charter]. (14) 2020 SCC 38 [Ontario v G]. (15) See ibid at paras 84-99. (16) 2021 SCC 27. (17) See e.g. David Dyzenhaus, "Schmitt V Dicey: Are States of Emergency Inside or Outside the Legal Order?" (2006) 27 Cardozo L Rev (18) See e......