Reid v. Reid
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Judge | The Honourable Madam Justice Newbury,The Honourable Mr. Justice Groberman,The Honourable Mr. Justice Willcock |
| Citation | 2017 BCCA 73 |
| Date | 16 February 2017 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
55 practice notes
-
Determination of income; disclosure of income
...s 17(1), as amended by SOR/2000-337, s 4; Steeves v English, [2004] AJ No 632 (CA); Harras v Lhotka, 2016 BCCA 246; Reid v Reid, 2017 BCCA 73; Stewart v Stewart, [2004] MJ No 272 (QB); Trevors v Jenkins, 2011 NBCA 61 (averaging income over four years); Sobczak v Evraire, 2013 ONSC 1249; Ste......
-
Determination of Income; Disclosure of Income
...s 17(1), as amended by SOR/2000-337, s 4; Steeves v English, [2004] AJ No 632 (CA); Harras v Lhotka, 2016 BCCA 246 ; Reid v Reid, 2017 BCCA 73; Stewart v [2004] MJ No 272 (QB); Trevors v Jenkins, 2011 NBCA 61 (averaging income over four years); Sobczak v Evraire, 2013 ONSC 1249 ; Stelte......
-
Low- and high-income earners; annual income over $150,000
...unreasonable, may, in a high income situation be 41 [2000] BCJ No 1693 (CA); see also Hathaway v Hathaway, 2014 BCCA 310; Reid v Reid, 2017 BCCA 73; Rémillard v Rémillard, 2014 MBCA 101; MDA v MS, [2008] NBJ No 498 (QB); Mercer v Rosenau, 2013 NLCA 64; REG v TJG, 2011 SKQB 269, especially p......
-
Effect of order or agreement or other arrangement that benefits child; consent orders
...45. 4 Richardson v Richardson, [1987] 1 SCR 857; Willick v Willick, [1994] 3 SCR 670; Wildeman v Wildeman, 2014 ABQB 732; Reid v Reid, 2017 BCCA 73; Aquilini v Aquilini, 2019 BCSC 1146; v MEL v PRH, 2018 NBQB 224; Picco v Picco, [2000] NJ No 64 (UFC); Kroupa v Stoneham, 2011 ONSC 5824; Fran......
Get Started for Free
25 cases
-
Grover v. Ecerova
...Substantial compliance in this context means “no significant departure” from the equities/objectives of the law (See: Reid v. Reid 2017 BCCA 73 at para. 57). But, because one part (or term) of an agreement is not in substantial compliance with the law does not mean that the entire agreement......
-
A.J.S.A. v K.L.W.
...or to find that some years are more reliably indicative of the amounts available to that spouse to pay support obligations: Reid v. Reid, 2017 BCCA 73 at para. 122, citing Harras v. Lhotka, 2016 BCCA 246 at para. 21. While this discretion is broad, “it is not to be exercised arbitrarily”: R......
-
Briggs v. Kasdorf
...provisions in separation agreements are not subject to the same level of deference that spousal support provisions enjoy: Reid v. Reid, 2017 BCCA 73, at paras. 87-88, citing Kopp v. Kopp, 2012 BCCA 140, and Kaler v. Kaler, 2013 BCCA [40] As noted, the claimant's notice of family claim refer......
-
M.A.J. v M.E.J.
...or to find that some years are more reliably indicative of the amounts available to that spouse to pay support obligations: Reid v. Reid, 2017 BCCA 73 at para. 122, citing Harras v. Lhotka, 2016 BCCA 246 at para. 21. While this discretion is broad, “it is not to be exercised arbitrarily”: R......
Get Started for Free
27 books & journal articles
-
Determination of income; disclosure of income
...s 17(1), as amended by SOR/2000-337, s 4; Steeves v English, [2004] AJ No 632 (CA); Harras v Lhotka, 2016 BCCA 246; Reid v Reid, 2017 BCCA 73; Stewart v Stewart, [2004] MJ No 272 (QB); Trevors v Jenkins, 2011 NBCA 61 (averaging income over four years); Sobczak v Evraire, 2013 ONSC 1249; Ste......
-
Determination of Income; Disclosure of Income
...s 17(1), as amended by SOR/2000-337, s 4; Steeves v English, [2004] AJ No 632 (CA); Harras v Lhotka, 2016 BCCA 246 ; Reid v Reid, 2017 BCCA 73; Stewart v [2004] MJ No 272 (QB); Trevors v Jenkins, 2011 NBCA 61 (averaging income over four years); Sobczak v Evraire, 2013 ONSC 1249 ; Stelte......
-
Low- and high-income earners; annual income over $150,000
...unreasonable, may, in a high income situation be 41 [2000] BCJ No 1693 (CA); see also Hathaway v Hathaway, 2014 BCCA 310; Reid v Reid, 2017 BCCA 73; Rémillard v Rémillard, 2014 MBCA 101; MDA v MS, [2008] NBJ No 498 (QB); Mercer v Rosenau, 2013 NLCA 64; REG v TJG, 2011 SKQB 269, especially p......
-
Effect of order or agreement or other arrangement that benefits child; consent orders
...45. 4 Richardson v Richardson, [1987] 1 SCR 857; Willick v Willick, [1994] 3 SCR 670; Wildeman v Wildeman, 2014 ABQB 732; Reid v Reid, 2017 BCCA 73; Aquilini v Aquilini, 2019 BCSC 1146; v MEL v PRH, 2018 NBQB 224; Picco v Picco, [2000] NJ No 64 (UFC); Kroupa v Stoneham, 2011 ONSC 5824; Fran......
Get Started for Free
