O'Reilly v. O'Reilly

JurisdictionAlberta
CourtCourt of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Citation2025 ABKB 103
Docket Number4801-182292
Date24 February 2025

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 practice notes
  • Kostic v AIG Insurance Company of Canada
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 22, 2026
    ...re-provide the same non-compliant Fiat Requests. [26] I summarized the principles related to nunc pro tunc relief in O'Reilly v O'Reilly, 2025 ABKB 103 at paras 106–108. Para 108 sets out non-exhaustive factors courts should consider. [27] In this case, nunc pro tunc relief is not granted. ......
  • O'Reilly v. O'Reilly
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 22, 2025
    ...Introduction [1]           In O’Reilly v O’Reilly, 2025 ABKB 103 (Reasons)[1][2], at para 217, I directed that if the parties were unable to agree on costs they could contact my office and I would set a process to settle costs of the Hearing......
  • McCulloch v. McCulloch
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 11, 2025
    ...obligation of the Petitioner’s estate and shall be a first charge upon his estate. [para 8] [emphasis added] [56] In O’Reilly v O’Reilly, 2025 ABKB 103, Marion J. drew the same conclusions as above on the state of Alberta As per Stalzer [v Stalzer, 2018 ABQB 191 (Read J.)] at para 45: “... ......
3 cases
  • Kostic v AIG Insurance Company of Canada
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 22, 2026
    ...re-provide the same non-compliant Fiat Requests. [26] I summarized the principles related to nunc pro tunc relief in O'Reilly v O'Reilly, 2025 ABKB 103 at paras 106–108. Para 108 sets out non-exhaustive factors courts should consider. [27] In this case, nunc pro tunc relief is not granted. ......
  • O'Reilly v. O'Reilly
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 22, 2025
    ...Introduction [1]           In O’Reilly v O’Reilly, 2025 ABKB 103 (Reasons)[1][2], at para 217, I directed that if the parties were unable to agree on costs they could contact my office and I would set a process to settle costs of the Hearing......
  • McCulloch v. McCulloch
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 11, 2025
    ...obligation of the Petitioner’s estate and shall be a first charge upon his estate. [para 8] [emphasis added] [56] In O’Reilly v O’Reilly, 2025 ABKB 103, Marion J. drew the same conclusions as above on the state of Alberta As per Stalzer [v Stalzer, 2018 ABQB 191 (Read J.)] at para 45: “... ......