Reiss v. Torys LLP
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Judge | Nishikawa J. |
| Citation | 2018 ONSC 5893 |
| Date | 04 October 2018 |
| Docket Number | CV-14-00516842 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
2 practice notes
-
Noori v Chagpar & Associates
...to each of the relevant factors set out in Cohen v. Kealy & Blaney as deemed appropriate in the circumstances: Reiss v. Torys LLP, 2018 ONSC 5893 at paras. 15, 35 In this case, the Assessment officer considered and weighed each of the nine Cohen v. Kealy & Blaney factors and set out......
-
Freedman v Khormalou
...The Assessment Officer was entitled to determine how much weight he gave to various parts of the evidence: Reiss v. Torys LLP, 2018 ONSC 5893, at para. Alleged Improper Conclusions Regarding Factor 6: Degree of Skill and Competence and Factor 7: Results Achieved 61 Mr. Freedman submits that......
2 cases
-
Noori v Chagpar & Associates
...to each of the relevant factors set out in Cohen v. Kealy & Blaney as deemed appropriate in the circumstances: Reiss v. Torys LLP, 2018 ONSC 5893 at paras. 15, 35 In this case, the Assessment officer considered and weighed each of the nine Cohen v. Kealy & Blaney factors and set out......
-
Freedman v Khormalou
...The Assessment Officer was entitled to determine how much weight he gave to various parts of the evidence: Reiss v. Torys LLP, 2018 ONSC 5893, at para. Alleged Improper Conclusions Regarding Factor 6: Degree of Skill and Competence and Factor 7: Results Achieved 61 Mr. Freedman submits that......