Restoule v. Canada (Attorney General),
Jurisdiction | Ontario |
Judge | Strathy C.J.O., Lauwers, Hourigan, Pardu and Brown JJ.A. |
Neutral Citation | 2021 ONCA 779 |
Citation | 2021 ONCA 779 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
Date | 05 November 2021 |
Docket Number | C66455 & C68595 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (August 28 – September 1)
...v. Emerson, [1891] A.C. 649 , Ngati Apa v. Attorney-General, [2003] NZCA 117 , 3 N.Z.L.R. 643 , Restoule v. Canada (Attorney General), 2021 ONCA 779, Manitoba Metis Federation Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2013 SCC 14 , Mikisew Cree First Nation v. Canada (Governor General in Counc......
-
Notes
...v Peguis Indian Band , [1990] 2 SCR 85 at 143. See also a recent airmation of this approach in Restoule v Canada (Attorney General) , 2021 ONCA 779 at paras 105f. 44 Ibid . Note, however, the dissent of Dickson CJ at 99. 45 (2004), 184 OAC 84 at 94 and RSO 1990, c C 38. 46 Declaration on th......
-
TSILHQOT'IN NATION AND INTERJURISDICTIONAL IMMUNITY: WHEN ARE JUDICIAL DECISIONS INVOLVING INDIGENOUS CLAIMS RETROACTIVE?
...[Peter Ballantyne]; Restoule v Canada (Attorney General), the Attorney General of Ontario and Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario, 2021 ONCA 779; Yahey, supra note (211) Supra note 1. (212) RSC 1985, c C-8. (213) See supra note 95 and accompanying text. (214) Hislop, supra note 1 at p......
-
Chippewas of Saugeen First Nation v. Town of South Bruce Peninsula et al.,
...c. I-5. [10] R. v. Sundown, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 393, at para. 24, citing R. v. Badger, [1996] 1 S.C.R. 771, at para. 41; Restoule v. Canada, 2021 ONCA 779, 466 D.L.R. (4th) 2, at paras. [11] [1999] 3 S.C.R. 456, at para. 78. See also Restoule at para. 388, quoting the trial judge at 2018 ONSC 7......
5 cases
-
Chippewas of Saugeen First Nation v. Town of South Bruce Peninsula et al.,
...c. I-5. [10] R. v. Sundown, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 393, at para. 24, citing R. v. Badger, [1996] 1 S.C.R. 771, at para. 41; Restoule v. Canada, 2021 ONCA 779, 466 D.L.R. (4th) 2, at paras. [11] [1999] 3 S.C.R. 456, at para. 78. See also Restoule at para. 388, quoting the trial judge at 2018 ONSC 7......
-
2023 ONCA 565,
...137 The principles governing the honour of the Crown were set out at some length by this court in Restoule v. Canada (Attorney General), 2021 ONCA 779, 466 D.L.R. (4th) 1 (“ Restoule (ONCA)”), leave to appeal granted, [2022] S.C.C.A. No. 5, and summed up at para. 241: The hono......
-
Chippewas of Nawash Unceded First Nation v Canada (Attorney General),
...137 The principles governing the honour of the Crown were set out at some length by this court in Restoule v. Canada (Attorney General), 2021 ONCA 779, 466 D.L.R. (4th) 1 (“ Restoule (ONCA)”), leave to appeal granted, [2022] S.C.C.A. No. 5, and summed up at para. 241: The hono......
-
2023 ONCA 543,
...Mitchell v. M.N.R., 2001 SCC 33, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 911, at para. 9, per McLachlin C.J. See also Restoule v. Canada (Attorney General), 2021 ONCA 779, 466 D.L.R. (4th) 1, at paras. 112–113. In what follows, this court's decision in Restoule is cited, sometimes paraphrased and somet......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (August 28 – September 1)
...v. Emerson, [1891] A.C. 649 , Ngati Apa v. Attorney-General, [2003] NZCA 117 , 3 N.Z.L.R. 643 , Restoule v. Canada (Attorney General), 2021 ONCA 779, Manitoba Metis Federation Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2013 SCC 14 , Mikisew Cree First Nation v. Canada (Governor General in Counc......
2 books & journal articles
-
Notes
...v Peguis Indian Band , [1990] 2 SCR 85 at 143. See also a recent airmation of this approach in Restoule v Canada (Attorney General) , 2021 ONCA 779 at paras 105f. 44 Ibid . Note, however, the dissent of Dickson CJ at 99. 45 (2004), 184 OAC 84 at 94 and RSO 1990, c C 38. 46 Declaration on th......
-
TSILHQOT'IN NATION AND INTERJURISDICTIONAL IMMUNITY: WHEN ARE JUDICIAL DECISIONS INVOLVING INDIGENOUS CLAIMS RETROACTIVE?
...[Peter Ballantyne]; Restoule v Canada (Attorney General), the Attorney General of Ontario and Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario, 2021 ONCA 779; Yahey, supra note (211) Supra note 1. (212) RSC 1985, c C-8. (213) See supra note 95 and accompanying text. (214) Hislop, supra note 1 at p......