Richmont Mines Inc. v. Teck Resources Limited, 2018 BCCA 452
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Bauman,D. Smith,Bennett |
| Citation | 2018 BCCA 452 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Date | 30 November 2018 |
| Docket Number | CA45246 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
16 practice notes
-
Escape 101 Ventures Inc. v. March of Dimes Canada,
...standard of review in order to advance the aims of commercial arbitration: Richmont Mines Inc. v. Teck Resources Limited, 2018 BCCA 452 at para. 15, citing Teal Cedar Products Ltd. v. British Columbia, 2017 SCC 32 at para. 1; Sattva at paras. 102–106; Ecoasis Resort and Gol......
-
The Supreme Court Of Canada Declines To Clean Up Confusion On The Standard Of Review Of Arbitral Decisions
...of these decisions, arbitral appeals became arguably more difficult to mount: see e.g. Richmont Mines Inc. v. Teck Resources Limited, 2018 BCCA 452. Vavilov Was Interpreted as Revisiting this Question Whatever confidence in the new legal tests related to appeals from arbitral awards was ach......
-
Kingsgate Property Ltd. v. Vancouver School District No. 39,
...the substantive issue of the correctness of the arbitrator’s decision: Richmont Mines Inc. v. Teck Resources Limited, 2018 BCCA 452 at See also Spirit Bay Developments Limited Partnership v. Scala Developments Consultants Ltd., 2022 BCCA 407 at para. 22 (noting th......
-
2023 BCSC 560,
...to consider the substantive issue of the correctness of the arbitrator's decision: Richmont Mines Inc. v. Teck Resources Limited, 2018 BCCA 452 at para. 61. See also Spirit Bay Developments Limited Partnership v. Scala Developments Consultants Ltd., 2022 BCCA 407 at para. 22 (noting th......
Request a trial to view additional results
14 cases
-
Escape 101 Ventures Inc. v. March of Dimes Canada,
...standard of review in order to advance the aims of commercial arbitration: Richmont Mines Inc. v. Teck Resources Limited, 2018 BCCA 452 at para. 15, citing Teal Cedar Products Ltd. v. British Columbia, 2017 SCC 32 at para. 1; Sattva at paras. 102–106; Ecoasis Resort and Gol......
-
Kingsgate Property Ltd. v. Vancouver School District No. 39,
...the substantive issue of the correctness of the arbitrator’s decision: Richmont Mines Inc. v. Teck Resources Limited, 2018 BCCA 452 at See also Spirit Bay Developments Limited Partnership v. Scala Developments Consultants Ltd., 2022 BCCA 407 at para. 22 (noting th......
-
2023 BCSC 560,
...to consider the substantive issue of the correctness of the arbitrator's decision: Richmont Mines Inc. v. Teck Resources Limited, 2018 BCCA 452 at para. 61. See also Spirit Bay Developments Limited Partnership v. Scala Developments Consultants Ltd., 2022 BCCA 407 at para. 22 (noting th......
-
MSI Methylation Sciences, Inc. v. Quark Venture Inc., 2019 BCCA 448
...of appellate review of commercial arbitration awards to extricable questions of law”: Richmont Mines Inc. v. Teck Resources Limited, 2018 BCCA 452 at para. 15. The result is that “only a very small window for appellate review of arbitral decisions remains”: Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Dr......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
-
The Supreme Court Of Canada Declines To Clean Up Confusion On The Standard Of Review Of Arbitral Decisions
...of these decisions, arbitral appeals became arguably more difficult to mount: see e.g. Richmont Mines Inc. v. Teck Resources Limited, 2018 BCCA 452. Vavilov Was Interpreted as Revisiting this Question Whatever confidence in the new legal tests related to appeals from arbitral awards was ach......
-
Here One Minute, Gone The Next: BC Court Of Appeal Overturns Chambers Judge's Decision To Grant Leave To Appeal An Arbitral Award In Richmont Mines Inc. v. Teck Resources Limited
...arbitration context, in order to preserve the efficiency and finality of the process as an alternative to litigation.xiii Footnotes [i] 2018 BCCA 452 [Richmont v. [ii] RSBC 1996, c 55, s 31 [the Act]. [iii] SO 1991, c 17, s 45(1). [iv] 2014 SCC 53 [Sattva]. [v] 2017 SCC 32 [Teal]. [vi] Satt......