Richter v. Chemerinski et al., [2014] A.R. Uned. 349 (QB)

JudgeVeit, J.
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Subject MatterCONTEMPT,PRACTICE
Citation[2014] A.R. Uned. 349 (QB),[2014] A.R. Uned. 349,2014 ABQB 322
Date28 May 2014
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • BDM v MMM, 2020 ABQB 288
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 24, 2020
    ...a contempt finding. Veit J canvassed the requirement for clarity and singularity of interpretation thoroughly in Richter v Chemerinski, 2014 ABQB 322 [Richter]. At para 27, she concluded that “appeal courts have consistently held that, in order to ground an application for contempt, an orde......
  • Gray v Goguen,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 14, 2022
    ...Toes and enrolling them in a different daycare during his parenting time would amount to a breach of the Order: Richter v Chemerinski, 2014 ABQB 322. The Respondent maintains that he did not believe that a decision to remove the boys from Tiny Toes during his parenting time would have any i......
  • Star Energy Canada Inc. v Builders Energy Services Ltd,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • November 14, 2023
    ...to the doctrine and has been used to reapportion costs awards in the context of post-judgment payor bankruptcy: Richter v Chemerinski, 2014 ABQB 322 at para 4; Yassa v Parker, 2014 ABQB 305 at para 20 These decisions allow for the granting of a further costs award after a final judgment or ......
  • Saunders v Saunders, 2017 ABQB 163
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 8, 2017
    ...these circumstances. An order must be sufficiently clear, precise and unambiguous to ground a finding of contempt: Richter v Chemerinski 2014 ABQB 322. Consent Order was not specific as to which days and at what times Ms. Saunders was to have access. The Court cannot enforce an order for pa......
4 cases
  • BDM v MMM, 2020 ABQB 288
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 24, 2020
    ...a contempt finding. Veit J canvassed the requirement for clarity and singularity of interpretation thoroughly in Richter v Chemerinski, 2014 ABQB 322 [Richter]. At para 27, she concluded that “appeal courts have consistently held that, in order to ground an application for contempt, an orde......
  • Gray v Goguen,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 14, 2022
    ...Toes and enrolling them in a different daycare during his parenting time would amount to a breach of the Order: Richter v Chemerinski, 2014 ABQB 322. The Respondent maintains that he did not believe that a decision to remove the boys from Tiny Toes during his parenting time would have any i......
  • Star Energy Canada Inc. v Builders Energy Services Ltd,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • November 14, 2023
    ...to the doctrine and has been used to reapportion costs awards in the context of post-judgment payor bankruptcy: Richter v Chemerinski, 2014 ABQB 322 at para 4; Yassa v Parker, 2014 ABQB 305 at para 20 These decisions allow for the granting of a further costs award after a final judgment or ......
  • Saunders v Saunders, 2017 ABQB 163
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 8, 2017
    ...these circumstances. An order must be sufficiently clear, precise and unambiguous to ground a finding of contempt: Richter v Chemerinski 2014 ABQB 322. Consent Order was not specific as to which days and at what times Ms. Saunders was to have access. The Court cannot enforce an order for pa......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT