Ricketts v. Veerisingnam

JurisdictionOntario
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
Neutral Citation2025 ONSC 841
Citation2025 ONSC 841
Docket NumberDC-24-1508; DC-24-1653-00JR
Date19 June 2025

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
5 practice notes
  • Products Unlimited, Inc. v. Five Seasons Comfort Limited
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 14, 2026
    ...recently adopted this approach, applying Palmer to new evidence in an appeal from an administrative tribunal: Ricketts v Veerisingnam, 2025 ONSC 841 (Div Ct) at para 34. However, I conclude the Palmer test should not be directly applied to appeals under section 56 of the Trademarks Act, for......
  • Huang v. Landlord and Tenant Board et al.
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • February 24, 2026
    ...Jonker at para. 42. [15]        The majority of the Divisional Court in Ricketts v. Veerisingnam, 2025 ONSC 841, set out at paras. 20-24 the applicable standard of review on a judicial review application of this nature: [20]      &......
  • Kiani et al v. Rivera et al.
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • November 13, 2025
    ...A complaint of ineffective representation at the Landlord and Tenant Board was also raised in Ricketts v. Veerisingnam, 2025 ONSC 841.  I agree with the views expressed by Corbett J. at paras. [4]               I would find th......
  • Ricketts v. Veerisingnam
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • July 21, 2025
    ...Divisional Court, in a split decision, dismissed Ms. Ricketts’ application for judicial review and her appeal, with reasons reported at 2025 ONSC 841. The dissent took the position that the result before the LTB might well have been tainted by the ineffective assistance of Ms. Ricketts’ cou......
  • Get Started for Free
5 cases
  • Products Unlimited, Inc. v. Five Seasons Comfort Limited
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 14, 2026
    ...recently adopted this approach, applying Palmer to new evidence in an appeal from an administrative tribunal: Ricketts v Veerisingnam, 2025 ONSC 841 (Div Ct) at para 34. However, I conclude the Palmer test should not be directly applied to appeals under section 56 of the Trademarks Act, for......
  • Huang v. Landlord and Tenant Board et al.
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • February 24, 2026
    ...Jonker at para. 42. [15]        The majority of the Divisional Court in Ricketts v. Veerisingnam, 2025 ONSC 841, set out at paras. 20-24 the applicable standard of review on a judicial review application of this nature: [20]      &......
  • Kiani et al v. Rivera et al.
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • November 13, 2025
    ...A complaint of ineffective representation at the Landlord and Tenant Board was also raised in Ricketts v. Veerisingnam, 2025 ONSC 841.  I agree with the views expressed by Corbett J. at paras. [4]               I would find th......
  • Ricketts v. Veerisingnam
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • July 21, 2025
    ...Divisional Court, in a split decision, dismissed Ms. Ricketts’ application for judicial review and her appeal, with reasons reported at 2025 ONSC 841. The dissent took the position that the result before the LTB might well have been tainted by the ineffective assistance of Ms. Ricketts’ cou......
  • Get Started for Free