Riley v. Ritsco, 2018 BCCA 366

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeThe Honourable Mr. Justice Frankel,The Honourable Mr. Justice Groberman,The Honourable Madam Justice Fenlon
Citation2018 BCCA 366
CourtCourt of Appeal (British Columbia)
Docket NumberCA44544
Date28 September 2018
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
160 practice notes
  • Aselstyne v. Stobbart,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • January 8, 2021
    ...or a non-pecuniary award: Kim v. Lin, 2018 BCCA 77 at para. 28. Categorizing such a loss is a discretionary decision. In Riley v. Ritsco, 2018 BCCA 366, the Court explained at para. [101] It is now well-established that where a plaintiff’s injuries lead to a requirement that they pay for ho......
  • Martin v. First Truck Centre Vancouver Inc., 2020 BCSC 240
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • February 24, 2020
    ...assessment of damages from pain and suffering, loss of amenities, and loss of enjoyment of life suffered by a plaintiff: Riley v. Ritsco, 2018 BCCA 366 at para. 102. [150] The plaintiff sought a separate award of $40,000 for loss of housekeeping capacity. I accept here that the plaintiff ha......
  • Firman v. Asadi, 2019 BCSC 270
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 1, 2019
    ...as part of the non-pecuniary loss or as a segregated pecuniary head of damage: Kim v. Lin, 2018 BCCA 77, at para. 33; Riley v. Ritsco, 2018 BCCA 366 [Riley] at para. 100. In Riley, Groberman J.A. [101] It is now well-established that where a plaintiff’s injuries lead to a requirement that t......
  • McMillan v. Lal, 2020 BCSC 847
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • June 8, 2020
    ...pecuniary head of damages: McTavish v. MacGillivray, 2000 BCCA 164 at para. 63; Kim v. Lin, 2018 BCCA 77 at para. 33; Riley v. Ritsco, 2018 BCCA 366 at para. 100. [70] The plaintiff seeks an award of $10,000 and a trust award of $10,000 for a total of $20,000. I accept that homemaking was a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
159 cases
  • Aselstyne v. Stobbart,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • January 8, 2021
    ...or a non-pecuniary award: Kim v. Lin, 2018 BCCA 77 at para. 28. Categorizing such a loss is a discretionary decision. In Riley v. Ritsco, 2018 BCCA 366, the Court explained at para. [101] It is now well-established that where a plaintiff’s injuries lead to a requirement that they pay for ho......
  • Martin v. First Truck Centre Vancouver Inc., 2020 BCSC 240
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • February 24, 2020
    ...assessment of damages from pain and suffering, loss of amenities, and loss of enjoyment of life suffered by a plaintiff: Riley v. Ritsco, 2018 BCCA 366 at para. 102. [150] The plaintiff sought a separate award of $40,000 for loss of housekeeping capacity. I accept here that the plaintiff ha......
  • Firman v. Asadi, 2019 BCSC 270
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 1, 2019
    ...as part of the non-pecuniary loss or as a segregated pecuniary head of damage: Kim v. Lin, 2018 BCCA 77, at para. 33; Riley v. Ritsco, 2018 BCCA 366 [Riley] at para. 100. In Riley, Groberman J.A. [101] It is now well-established that where a plaintiff’s injuries lead to a requirement that t......
  • McMillan v. Lal, 2020 BCSC 847
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • June 8, 2020
    ...pecuniary head of damages: McTavish v. MacGillivray, 2000 BCCA 164 at para. 63; Kim v. Lin, 2018 BCCA 77 at para. 33; Riley v. Ritsco, 2018 BCCA 366 at para. 100. [70] The plaintiff seeks an award of $10,000 and a trust award of $10,000 for a total of $20,000. I accept that homemaking was a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Should Loss Of Housekeeping Capacity Be A Separate Head Of Damage?
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • January 31, 2019
    ...provide some useful analysis of this issue. In the aforementioned Kim decision as well as in the further decision of Riley v. Ritsco, 2018 BCCA 366 [Riley], the Court of Appeal considered (a) when damages should be awarded for loss of housekeeping capacity and (b) whether that loss should b......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT