Riley v. Ritsco, 2018 BCCA 366
Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Frankel,The Honourable Mr. Justice Groberman,The Honourable Madam Justice Fenlon |
Citation | 2018 BCCA 366 |
Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
Docket Number | CA44544 |
Date | 28 September 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
160 practice notes
-
Aselstyne v. Stobbart,
...or a non-pecuniary award: Kim v. Lin, 2018 BCCA 77 at para. 28. Categorizing such a loss is a discretionary decision. In Riley v. Ritsco, 2018 BCCA 366, the Court explained at para. [101] It is now well-established that where a plaintiff’s injuries lead to a requirement that they pay for ho......
-
Martin v. First Truck Centre Vancouver Inc., 2020 BCSC 240
...assessment of damages from pain and suffering, loss of amenities, and loss of enjoyment of life suffered by a plaintiff: Riley v. Ritsco, 2018 BCCA 366 at para. 102. [150] The plaintiff sought a separate award of $40,000 for loss of housekeeping capacity. I accept here that the plaintiff ha......
-
Firman v. Asadi, 2019 BCSC 270
...as part of the non-pecuniary loss or as a segregated pecuniary head of damage: Kim v. Lin, 2018 BCCA 77, at para. 33; Riley v. Ritsco, 2018 BCCA 366 [Riley] at para. 100. In Riley, Groberman J.A. [101] It is now well-established that where a plaintiff’s injuries lead to a requirement that t......
-
McMillan v. Lal, 2020 BCSC 847
...pecuniary head of damages: McTavish v. MacGillivray, 2000 BCCA 164 at para. 63; Kim v. Lin, 2018 BCCA 77 at para. 33; Riley v. Ritsco, 2018 BCCA 366 at para. 100. [70] The plaintiff seeks an award of $10,000 and a trust award of $10,000 for a total of $20,000. I accept that homemaking was a......
Request a trial to view additional results
159 cases
-
Aselstyne v. Stobbart,
...or a non-pecuniary award: Kim v. Lin, 2018 BCCA 77 at para. 28. Categorizing such a loss is a discretionary decision. In Riley v. Ritsco, 2018 BCCA 366, the Court explained at para. [101] It is now well-established that where a plaintiff’s injuries lead to a requirement that they pay for ho......
-
Martin v. First Truck Centre Vancouver Inc., 2020 BCSC 240
...assessment of damages from pain and suffering, loss of amenities, and loss of enjoyment of life suffered by a plaintiff: Riley v. Ritsco, 2018 BCCA 366 at para. 102. [150] The plaintiff sought a separate award of $40,000 for loss of housekeeping capacity. I accept here that the plaintiff ha......
-
Firman v. Asadi, 2019 BCSC 270
...as part of the non-pecuniary loss or as a segregated pecuniary head of damage: Kim v. Lin, 2018 BCCA 77, at para. 33; Riley v. Ritsco, 2018 BCCA 366 [Riley] at para. 100. In Riley, Groberman J.A. [101] It is now well-established that where a plaintiff’s injuries lead to a requirement that t......
-
McMillan v. Lal, 2020 BCSC 847
...pecuniary head of damages: McTavish v. MacGillivray, 2000 BCCA 164 at para. 63; Kim v. Lin, 2018 BCCA 77 at para. 33; Riley v. Ritsco, 2018 BCCA 366 at para. 100. [70] The plaintiff seeks an award of $10,000 and a trust award of $10,000 for a total of $20,000. I accept that homemaking was a......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Should Loss Of Housekeeping Capacity Be A Separate Head Of Damage?
...provide some useful analysis of this issue. In the aforementioned Kim decision as well as in the further decision of Riley v. Ritsco, 2018 BCCA 366 [Riley], the Court of Appeal considered (a) when damages should be awarded for loss of housekeeping capacity and (b) whether that loss should b......